Categories
Government Healthcare The Democratic Difference Whatever

Democrats: what exactly are you angry about?

People are angry because 8 Democratic Senators voted with Republicans to pass a continuing resolution and re-open the government. The measure now goes to the House where, if Johnson remembers where he left the key to open the doors, it’s likely to pass.

Democrats are furious with the Democrats who joined with the Republicans. Oh, not the Republicans for not negotiating with us. Not with Johnson for keeping the House shut down.

No, all the anger is directed at Senate Democrats, because they did not keep up the fight.

I can understand. I was pretty disappointed myself. I really wanted to see us push back on the harm Trump has been doing to the country; to show he’s not the boss of all of us. And I wanted us to help the millions of people who are about to lose their no longer affordable healthcare.

We ended up shutting the government down for 40 days and seemingly have nothing to show for it. Wow, Senate Democrats…you suck.

Except there’s a part of me that knows we had only two choices at this point: We could continue the government shut down until Trump gets his way, and the Senate Republicans kill the filibuster; or we could vote for the CR, without the healthcare subsidies. There are no other options.

We knew these were the only options when Schumer made his offer of a deal last week: that Democrats would drop all other demands in exchange for getting the healthcare subsidies. This was a good deal for Republicans. After all, a whole lot of Republican voters are now facing higher insurance costs, and the subsidies have overwhelming support with both Republicans and Democrats. The Republicans could also claim that they got Democrats to drop all other demands and re-opened the government.

But they didn’t take the deal. They not only didn’t take the deal, their faux outrage and instant rejection told us there was no deal Democrats could offer that Republicans would take. They wanted complete capitulation and they were willing to keep the government shut down as long as it took to get the Democrats to give up. To them, the greater harm was bipartisanship.

People keep talking about how Congressional Democrats don’t seem to understand how things have changed with Trump, and they have to change what they do to fight him. But we, on the outside of Congress looking in, also need to understand that things have changed. There’s a new math in play.

You have, on one side of an equation, us. On the other side, you have a group of people who only care about one thing: holding power. They don’t care about anything else.

They don’t care that we can’t afford healthcare. They don’t care if hungry people get fed. They don’t care if planes fly on time. They certainly don’t care that the federal government continues to function.

Once upon a time, they may have cared about these things, or a minimum, cared about the optics of voters not getting fed, not having healthcare, being able to safely travel, and have a functioning government. But people voted for Trump and he promised none of this, and this sent a message to today’s Republicans: the only thing that matters is holding power and the way to hold power is by pleasing Trump, and the best way to please Trump is hurting Democrats.

How to hurt Democrats? Well, basically, you hurt the people of this country: the more vulnerable the people, the better.

Nothing else matters.

So, wise and wonderful pundits who have been nammering for two days about the awful Democratic senators, how exactly do you negotiate successfully with a people who see no harm coming from doing nothing? No, let me rephrase the question: How exactly can you fight people like this without also harming the people of this country?

When you have a President and party in control that don’t give a damn about anything else but themselves, everything that we thought we knew about responsible governance goes out the door.

House Democrats can easily fight Republicans just by not voting for anything the Republicans want to pass, because we can be fairly confident that whatever they want won’t be any good. House Democrats can always dance on the side of angels.

Senate Democrats, though, are hindered by this thing called a filibuster, which requires 60 votes to pass anything in the Senate. It’s an outdated, outmoded idea that invariably harms the Democrats, and frankly, the people of this country, more than it constrains the Republicans. We should have dumped it when we had a chance, but didn’t.

But, we still have the filibuster. And because we do, Senate Democrats have basically two choices from now on: either a small subset throws themselves on the sword and votes to continue funding the government and keeping it functioning; or they all go for broke—do nothing for potentially several months, until Trump bullies Senate Republicans into dropping the filibuster to end the shutdown.

Either choice has consequences. Funding the government means people will lose healthcare. But not funding the government until the Republicans decide to blow up the filibuster means people still don’t have affordable healthcare, but we also have a badly broken government from being nonfunctioning for so long, and a severely harmed vulnerable population. And Senate Republicans can finally do the things they’ve wanted to do but couldn’t because of the filibuster:

  • Make it difficult to vote
  • Make life hell for the trans community
  • Kill or maim the Affordable Care Act
  • Starve SNAP, and diminish Medicaid even more
  • Attack vaccines, prohibit abortions nationally, and kill birth control
  • Cut taxes even more for the wealthy
  • Destroy most government functionality, particularly the components that regulate commerce and industries
  • Undermine academic freedom
  • Expand the military and federal police organizations
  • Push up the age in which a person can access Social Security and Medicare

Well, the list goes on. All you have to do is listen to the Trump administration folks and Congressional Republicans on Sunday talk shows to see the world they want to create. Or re-read the Project 2025 manifesto.

I used to think that Republicans had enough survival instincts to know that doing all of this will ultimately result in them losing power, but…people voted for Trump a second time. We no longer live in a rational universe.

As much as I think the filibuster harms Democratic goals, thank goodness we have it now.

Once the Republicans turned down the Schumer proposal, we knew there was nothing we could offer that the Republicans wanted. Their entire purpose now is to please Trump, because they see this as the way of holding onto power. And Trump has no problems inflicting maximum harm on the country to get his way, and his way is total domination of Democrats and complete subjugation of the country.

Other than being annoyed because nasty journalists keep asking him questions about it, Trump could care less that the country is shut down. It doesn’t stop him from building monuments to himself. It doesn’t stop his migrant pogrom. It certainly doesn’t stop him funding what he wants to fund, regardless of what Congress does.

It might be satisfying to keep the government shut down because it gives us the illusion we hold Congressional power, but we really don’t. Not unless we’re willing to sacrifice people who need food, who need to be paid, who are under threat of losing cars and homes, because of the shutdown.

The power we do have is our resistance, but never to the point of harming people who don’t deserve to be harmed. But, we can resist much in Congress without harming folks, and we should. We can resist much in the streets, and we will. We can resist when we vote, and we must.

Most importantly, we can remember exactly who it is we are resisting, and never let the pundits tell us otherwise.

When voters see their healthcare double at the end of the year, it won’t be because of a choice eight Democrats made, but because this is the choice 52 Republicans made. When people get their SNAP benefits, federal workers get their jobs back and get paid, and the country is functioning again, it won’t be because 52 Republicans voted, but because eight Democrats did.

Categories
Whatever

The PSC Election and Missing Chatham County Ballots

I like to vote absentee ballot when I can. Georgia has no-excuse absentee voting, which means you don’t have a doctor’s permission slip or special circumstances to vote absentee.

In past elections, absentee ballots kept us from having to stand in long lines, and also helped keep those lines from being even longer. During COVID, they helped keep us from getting sick.

Frankly, I don’t understand why all states don’t have a mail-in only election systems, since doing so increases voter participation and decreases election day kerfuffles. Unfortunately, though, there seems to be politicians who prefer that people not vote and do everything they can to make it more difficult. Such is life.

Normally, voting by absentee ballot in Georgia has been problem free for us. During COVID, we could even use dropoff boxes for our ballots, which made the process simpler and avoided USPS delays. But this year, both the Chatham county Board of Registrars and seemingly the USPS have let the folks in our county down.

The absentee ballot process was already compromised this year by Secretary of State Raffensperger’s decision that rather than submitting an absentee ballot request just once if you’re elderly or military, we had to submit requests for each election since this year’s election is a ‘special’ one. This caused confusion and likely led to some folks not getting an absentee ballot when they expected to get one.

In addition, the absentee ballot system we can access through the Georgia My Voter web site is supposed to reflect when absentee ballot requests are accepted. However, Chatham county registrar personnel did NOT update the database when the request was accepted. No, instead, they postdated the updates on the same day the absentee ballots were supposedly mailed: October 14th.

I had to email to see if our ballot requests were accepted. Another voter, Randy Ritchie, noted in a comment to the Board of Registrar’s Facebook page:

People, go sign in to your voter portal, look at the notifications. Look at the backdated entries of dates ballots received, then the entry that ballots went out Oct 14th. Yet when I called them on the 13th, they first said no record ballots were requested. Then they found my email of August 20th during that approximately one hour phone call.

And about that mailing date of October 14th…

By law, absentee ballots in this state could be mailed October 7th for this November’s election. The Secretary of State’s website did note that some counties could mail them later, but this begs the question: why?

Why wait an extra week? Especially when there have been changes, particularly in rural voting areas, in how the USPS does handle mail that could result in mail delays. The issues were known in plenty of time to update ballot forms. The turnout, including requests for absentee ballots, is light for this election.

So why wait an extra week?

That extra week could have come in handy in Chatham county when you consider a large block of absentee ballots has gone missing.

The weekend after the absentee ballots were supposedly mailed, I posted in the New Savannah Town Square Facebook page that I hadn’t received mine yet. I updated again, several times, the following week when each day brought another USPS Informed Delivery email with no ballot listed. Others commented on the posts that they or their adult children at school have not received their ballots.

We also contacted the voter registration office, and were assured that replacement ballots would be issued.

Finally, the news media picked up on the missing ballots the end of last week. In the news we heard that the vendor in North Carolina (North Carolina?) had printed out the ballots and dropped them off at the post office on the 15th.

From The Current, we found out that a block of 533 of these ballots supposedly mailed the 15th of October might be missing.

On Oct. 15, a batch of 533 absentee ballots processed by the vendor were transferred to a post office and logged into its system, according to Sabrina German, the office’s supervisor, as well as a statement issued by the registrar’s office on Friday.

 

Of the 999 applications for mail-in ballots accepted in Chatham County, only six had been returned by late Friday.

As of last Friday, only six ballots of 999 requested have been received,. Only six ballots eleven days before the election. Six ballots with an unknown number of missing ballots that Chatham County supposedly had reissued, thought the exact number of ballots actually missing is completely unknown. We currently don’t know if all missing ballots were reissued since they don’t know what happened to any of them.

The registration office then made a promise to the news organizations last week that those of us with missing ballots would receive them by today, Monday, the 27th.

Nope. Nada. Zip.  Today’s USPS Informed delivery shows I’m getting a piece of junk mail, and that’s it.

Well, thank goodness the junk mail is getting through.

At this point in time, even if we receive the ballots tomorrow (and frankly, this is a big if), we can no longer trust that we can turn them around quickly enough for them to arrive by November 4th (the USPS recommends allowing at least five days to ensure your letter is delivered in time). Since the Georgia state legislature won’t allow ballots to be counted that arrive late even when properly dated by the post office, this could mean our votes won’t be counted.

And this is a big deal in more ways than one.

This special election is for two members of the Public Services Commission. Currently all members of the commission are Republican. In addition, all members have demonstrated a remarkably friendly relationship with Georgia Power, to the point of allowing Georgia Power to increase our electrical rates six times since 2023.

Six times, in two years.

This year, the positions of two incumbents, Tim Echols and Fitz Johnson, are up for re-election and they’ve been challenged by Democrats Alicia Johnson and Peter Hubbard, respectively.

The PSC election is a highly contentious one, with Republicans and Georgia Power wanting to keep the incumbents while people of all political parties wanting a change. It is particularly contentious for two reasons: Georgia Power wants to those keep friendly PSC members, and generally, rate payers, don’t; and the race is seen as a possible sign of how well the 2026 midterm elections will go, with Republicans and Democrats both wanting to use the election as a Sign of What Will Come.

At the same time, since this is an off-year election, turnout is low. When you have low turnout and a contentious election you have the recipe for legal challenges regardless of the result. For instance, if a race is close, let’s say within a few hundred votes, and several hundred ballots may have gone missing in Chatham county…well, you can see where this heading. And a simple recount won’t fix the problem: whoever loses in this race could challenge the entire election, and who knows where this could lead. Potentially, we could be looking at a redo of the election, or even an invalidation and possibly having to hold the election of these two positions over until next year.

That extra week the Chatham county Board of Registrars decided we didn’t need could have been used to fix this problem and still allow enough time for people to return their ballots. Now?

It’s a crap shoot.

More importantly, the election, itself, has been compromised. And in today’s political environment, any hint of a compromised election is enough to bring out the hordes. As it is, what’s happening in Chatham county is already being used to target no-excuse absentee voting for the entire state. As noted in The Current:

Election races decided by hundreds, even scores, of votes mean, among other things, that the missing absentee ballots could form the basis of a legal challenge to the vote. As of Friday, 6,645 out of Chatham County’s 231,196 registered voters — or 2.8% — had cast ballots in early in-person voting, according to the registrar’s office website.

 

More broadly, it adds momentum to calls for curbs in mail-in voting.

So what can we do?

If you haven’t received your absentee ballot yet, and you can vote in person, do so. Early voting is still happening until the 31st. Or you can vote on election day. You can also drop your ballot off at the voter registration office on Eisenhower, or at the dropbox locations at:

  • Voter Registration Office (1117 Eisenhower Dr, Suite E)
  • Mosquito Control Board (65 Billy B. Hair Drive)
  • Islands Library (50 Johnny Mercer Blvd.)

If you can’t vote in person or visit the dropbox locations directly, then get that ballot in the mail as fast as you can. Hopefully, we can still get the ballots processed in time. Knock on wood.

To ensure the ballots are properly handled by the mail, they can be dropped off at the post office. And you don’t have to do this yourself: you can have a friend or relative drop the ballots off for you. It’s against Georgia law for people to drop absentee ballots off at dropboxes for anyone not in their household, but not for them to drop the ballots off at the post office (showing how absolutely idiotic the dropbox law is).

Whatever you have to do, please do it.

As for the Chatham county voter registration,  the office supervisor, Sabrina German, noted to the media last week:

“I am glad that we caught it in enough time that we were able to send out a second ballot and that the voters will still have the same chance to actually vote in this particular election.”

Well, Ms. German, the ballot is still, seemingly, in the mail. And no, you didn’t catch any of this in time. As Mr. Richie noted in his comment to the Board of Registrar’s Facebook post:

I’ve been given more than one excuse as to why we didn’t get our absentee ballots. I’ve spoken to the Board of assessors supervisor, then the manager. They have one job, failed. Two disabled seniors, and I’m too sick right now to try and go vote in early voting.

Categories
Government Legal, Laws, and Regs Whatever

Lawyers, next time, talk to the techs

I’m following several lawsuits related to recent Trump/DOGE antics. Among them is a lawsuit by the Alliance for Retired Americans related to DOGE access to Treasury fiscal systems.

First of all, none of the DOGE techies who have been mentioned at Wired have the expertise to even understand the Treasury systems, much less modify them without hopelessly breaking them. Most of the DOGE people are script kiddies, not folks who have worked with large enterprise systems—especially systems likely to have been written in Java.

Secondly, most of these people have no training in working with larger enterprise systems. Working with Teslas and space ships does not equip you to create the massive systems in place at Treasury and likely many other government systems. Heck, there’s no indication any of them even know how to use project management systems such as Git, if this screenshot of a X-witter post is any indication.

Tweet bragging about one of the DOGE developers being able to rewrite code accidentally deleted. A good coder would never be put into this position.
Rookie Mistake 1: no backups

To stop the costly destruction that could be catastrophic for so many people in this country, lawyers for several groups filed a lawsuit against Treasury, demanding that DOGE be stopped from potentially damaging these essential systems. They also asked for a Temporary Restraining order to take effect while the case is litigated.

During a hearing yesterday,  the judge and both sides agreed to a proposed order to ‘maintain the status quo’ of the systems by only allowing limited read-only access to DOGE ‘special employees’. However, they agreed to let Treasury employees unfettered access to the systems.

Any person who is an employee (but not a Special Government Employee) of the Department of the Treasury and who has a need for the record or system of recordsin the performance of their duties;

Employees like Thomas Shedd, who was brought in by DOGE. Employees like Shedd who is an employee solely because of DOGE coercion.

Employees like Shedd who can now rummage about these systems without any hindrance, doing whatever he wants to these systems.

Legal folk: you don’t like techies like me to write about or dabble with the law because we’re not experts. At the same time, you don’t bring in tech experts likebe me to ensure you’re not making a terrible mistake with the legal agreements you make. And this was a hell of a bad agreement.

You should have phrased the order to only include employees who were employed in the Treasury before January 1, 2025. Now, DOGE could tell Bessant to ‘hire’ any number of DOGE people who will  have free reign over these system, and they won’t violate this court order.

In fact, Bessant can go to Congress or write letters to Congressional members stating that the DOGE special employees have read-only access, while DOGE-affiliated techs have unrestricted access to everything.

Bad call. Really bad call. Lawyers, next time, talk to the techs.

Also published at Substack

 

Categories
Political Whatever

Unity Trump meets Chaos Trump and the results aren’t pretty

I don’t listen to speeches I read the transcripts. The transcripts cut through the optics to the substance, and the substance is all I care about.

After Trump’s RNC speech, I went looking for the transcript and found one at a local NBC affiliate. The only problem is, what I was reading in that transcript didn’t match what people were talking about. What the NBC affiliate had posted was the press-release speech that was posted to the teleprompter…not the actual speech with Trump riffs. A whole lot of Trump riffs.

I found the actual speech at the NY Times and copied it. I then  decided to post it here, and note the differences between the two. The question then is: highlight the prepared or highlight the riffs?

The riffs won. And if you want to really know what we’ll get with Trump as President, I’d pay attention to the bold bits.

Categories
Immigration Legal, Laws, and Regs Whatever

US vs Abbott US Response

And in my current favorite legal case, US vs Abbott, the federal government has responded to the reply Texas filed against the demand for a preliminary injunction.

This damn case is such a no brainer. The majority of the buoys are in Mexican territory and must be removed. Mexico has asked the federal government to remove them. This has become a real point of contention between the countries, and causing real harm. End of story.
As for the ‘navigable’ crap, as the filing notes, though portions of the Rio Grande may not be navigable now, they can be made to be navigable. And that’s the true definition of ‘navigable’ according to the laws of our land, though we know that Thomas wants to undermine this understanding.

In addition, there’s all sorts of foreign treaties between us and Mexico related to the river.

Lastly, as the federal government notes, an ‘invasion’ is not individuals seeking to immigrant. An ‘invasion’ according to Congress and US laws is an organized armed attack. And the US government is tasked with protecting the US border, also end of story.

Unless this judge is the worst in the country, and I don’t have reason to believe he is, the damn buoys will finally be removed.

And guess what, kiddos: We’re going to have to pay for it.

Court Document