Categories
Whatever

The PSC Election and Missing Chatham County Ballots

I like to vote absentee ballot when I can. Georgia has no-excuse absentee voting, which means you don’t have a doctor’s permission slip or special circumstances to vote absentee.

In past elections, absentee ballots kept us from having to stand in long lines, and also helped keep those lines from being even longer. During COVID, they helped keep us from getting sick.

Frankly, I don’t understand why all states don’t have a mail-in only election systems, since doing so increases voter participation and decreases election day kerfuffles. Unfortunately, though, there seems to be politicians who prefer that people not vote and do everything they can to make it more difficult. Such is life.

Normally, voting by absentee ballot in Georgia has been problem free for us. During COVID, we could even use dropoff boxes for our ballots, which made the process simpler and avoided USPS delays. But this year, both the Chatham county Board of Registrars and seemingly the USPS have let the folks in our county down.

The absentee ballot process was already compromised this year by Secretary of State Raffensperger’s decision that rather than submitting an absentee ballot request just once if you’re elderly or military, we had to submit requests for each election since this year’s election is a ‘special’ one. This caused confusion and likely led to some folks not getting an absentee ballot when they expected to get one.

In addition, the absentee ballot system we can access through the Georgia My Voter web site is supposed to reflect when absentee ballot requests are accepted. However, Chatham county registrar personnel did NOT update the database when the request was accepted. No, instead, they postdated the updates on the same day the absentee ballots were supposedly mailed: October 14th.

I had to email to see if our ballot requests were accepted. Another voter, Randy Ritchie, noted in a comment to the Board of Registrar’s Facebook page:

People, go sign in to your voter portal, look at the notifications. Look at the backdated entries of dates ballots received, then the entry that ballots went out Oct 14th. Yet when I called them on the 13th, they first said no record ballots were requested. Then they found my email of August 20th during that approximately one hour phone call.

And about that mailing date of October 14th…

By law, absentee ballots in this state could be mailed October 7th for this November’s election. The Secretary of State’s website did note that some counties could mail them later, but this begs the question: why?

Why wait an extra week? Especially when there have been changes, particularly in rural voting areas, in how the USPS does handle mail that could result in mail delays. The issues were known in plenty of time to update ballot forms. The turnout, including requests for absentee ballots, is light for this election.

So why wait an extra week?

That extra week could have come in handy in Chatham county when you consider a large block of absentee ballots has gone missing.

The weekend after the absentee ballots were supposedly mailed, I posted in the New Savannah Town Square Facebook page that I hadn’t received mine yet. I updated again, several times, the following week when each day brought another USPS Informed Delivery email with no ballot listed. Others commented on the posts that they or their adult children at school have not received their ballots.

We also contacted the voter registration office, and were assured that replacement ballots would be issued.

Finally, the news media picked up on the missing ballots the end of last week. In the news we heard that the vendor in North Carolina (North Carolina?) had printed out the ballots and dropped them off at the post office on the 15th.

From The Current, we found out that a block of 533 of these ballots supposedly mailed the 15th of October might be missing.

On Oct. 15, a batch of 533 absentee ballots processed by the vendor were transferred to a post office and logged into its system, according to Sabrina German, the office’s supervisor, as well as a statement issued by the registrar’s office on Friday.

 

Of the 999 applications for mail-in ballots accepted in Chatham County, only six had been returned by late Friday.

As of last Friday, only six ballots of 999 requested have been received,. Only six ballots eleven days before the election. Six ballots with an unknown number of missing ballots that Chatham County supposedly had reissued, thought the exact number of ballots actually missing is completely unknown. We currently don’t know if all missing ballots were reissued since they don’t know what happened to any of them.

The registration office then made a promise to the news organizations last week that those of us with missing ballots would receive them by today, Monday, the 27th.

Nope. Nada. Zip.  Today’s USPS Informed delivery shows I’m getting a piece of junk mail, and that’s it.

Well, thank goodness the junk mail is getting through.

At this point in time, even if we receive the ballots tomorrow (and frankly, this is a big if), we can no longer trust that we can turn them around quickly enough for them to arrive by November 4th (the USPS recommends allowing at least five days to ensure your letter is delivered in time). Since the Georgia state legislature won’t allow ballots to be counted that arrive late even when properly dated by the post office, this could mean our votes won’t be counted.

And this is a big deal in more ways than one.

This special election is for two members of the Public Services Commission. Currently all members of the commission are Republican. In addition, all members have demonstrated a remarkably friendly relationship with Georgia Power, to the point of allowing Georgia Power to increase our electrical rates six times since 2023.

Six times, in two years.

This year, the positions of two incumbents, Tim Echols and Fitz Johnson, are up for re-election and they’ve been challenged by Democrats Alicia Johnson and Peter Hubbard, respectively.

The PSC election is a highly contentious one, with Republicans and Georgia Power wanting to keep the incumbents while people of all political parties wanting a change. It is particularly contentious for two reasons: Georgia Power wants to those keep friendly PSC members, and generally, rate payers, don’t; and the race is seen as a possible sign of how well the 2026 midterm elections will go, with Republicans and Democrats both wanting to use the election as a Sign of What Will Come.

At the same time, since this is an off-year election, turnout is low. When you have low turnout and a contentious election you have the recipe for legal challenges regardless of the result. For instance, if a race is close, let’s say within a few hundred votes, and several hundred ballots may have gone missing in Chatham county…well, you can see where this heading. And a simple recount won’t fix the problem: whoever loses in this race could challenge the entire election, and who knows where this could lead. Potentially, we could be looking at a redo of the election, or even an invalidation and possibly having to hold the election of these two positions over until next year.

That extra week the Chatham county Board of Registrars decided we didn’t need could have been used to fix this problem and still allow enough time for people to return their ballots. Now?

It’s a crap shoot.

More importantly, the election, itself, has been compromised. And in today’s political environment, any hint of a compromised election is enough to bring out the hordes. As it is, what’s happening in Chatham county is already being used to target no-excuse absentee voting for the entire state. As noted in The Current:

Election races decided by hundreds, even scores, of votes mean, among other things, that the missing absentee ballots could form the basis of a legal challenge to the vote. As of Friday, 6,645 out of Chatham County’s 231,196 registered voters — or 2.8% — had cast ballots in early in-person voting, according to the registrar’s office website.

 

More broadly, it adds momentum to calls for curbs in mail-in voting.

So what can we do?

If you haven’t received your absentee ballot yet, and you can vote in person, do so. Early voting is still happening until the 31st. Or you can vote on election day. You can also drop your ballot off at the voter registration office on Eisenhower, or at the dropbox locations at:

  • Voter Registration Office (1117 Eisenhower Dr, Suite E)
  • Mosquito Control Board (65 Billy B. Hair Drive)
  • Islands Library (50 Johnny Mercer Blvd.)

If you can’t vote in person or visit the dropbox locations directly, then get that ballot in the mail as fast as you can. Hopefully, we can still get the ballots processed in time. Knock on wood.

To ensure the ballots are properly handled by the mail, they can be dropped off at the post office. And you don’t have to do this yourself: you can have a friend or relative drop the ballots off for you. It’s against Georgia law for people to drop absentee ballots off at dropboxes for anyone not in their household, but not for them to drop the ballots off at the post office (showing how absolutely idiotic the dropbox law is).

Whatever you have to do, please do it.

As for the Chatham county voter registration,  the office supervisor, Sabrina German, noted to the media last week:

“I am glad that we caught it in enough time that we were able to send out a second ballot and that the voters will still have the same chance to actually vote in this particular election.”

Well, Ms. German, the ballot is still, seemingly, in the mail. And no, you didn’t catch any of this in time. As Mr. Richie noted in his comment to the Board of Registrar’s Facebook post:

I’ve been given more than one excuse as to why we didn’t get our absentee ballots. I’ve spoken to the Board of assessors supervisor, then the manager. They have one job, failed. Two disabled seniors, and I’m too sick right now to try and go vote in early voting.

Categories
Government Legal, Laws, and Regs Whatever

Lawyers, next time, talk to the techs

I’m following several lawsuits related to recent Trump/DOGE antics. Among them is a lawsuit by the Alliance for Retired Americans related to DOGE access to Treasury fiscal systems.

First of all, none of the DOGE techies who have been mentioned at Wired have the expertise to even understand the Treasury systems, much less modify them without hopelessly breaking them. Most of the DOGE people are script kiddies, not folks who have worked with large enterprise systems—especially systems likely to have been written in Java.

Secondly, most of these people have no training in working with larger enterprise systems. Working with Teslas and space ships does not equip you to create the massive systems in place at Treasury and likely many other government systems. Heck, there’s no indication any of them even know how to use project management systems such as Git, if this screenshot of a X-witter post is any indication.

Tweet bragging about one of the DOGE developers being able to rewrite code accidentally deleted. A good coder would never be put into this position.
Rookie Mistake 1: no backups

To stop the costly destruction that could be catastrophic for so many people in this country, lawyers for several groups filed a lawsuit against Treasury, demanding that DOGE be stopped from potentially damaging these essential systems. They also asked for a Temporary Restraining order to take effect while the case is litigated.

During a hearing yesterday,  the judge and both sides agreed to a proposed order to ‘maintain the status quo’ of the systems by only allowing limited read-only access to DOGE ‘special employees’. However, they agreed to let Treasury employees unfettered access to the systems.

Any person who is an employee (but not a Special Government Employee) of the Department of the Treasury and who has a need for the record or system of recordsin the performance of their duties;

Employees like Thomas Shedd, who was brought in by DOGE. Employees like Shedd who is an employee solely because of DOGE coercion.

Employees like Shedd who can now rummage about these systems without any hindrance, doing whatever he wants to these systems.

Legal folk: you don’t like techies like me to write about or dabble with the law because we’re not experts. At the same time, you don’t bring in tech experts likebe me to ensure you’re not making a terrible mistake with the legal agreements you make. And this was a hell of a bad agreement.

You should have phrased the order to only include employees who were employed in the Treasury before January 1, 2025. Now, DOGE could tell Bessant to ‘hire’ any number of DOGE people who will  have free reign over these system, and they won’t violate this court order.

In fact, Bessant can go to Congress or write letters to Congressional members stating that the DOGE special employees have read-only access, while DOGE-affiliated techs have unrestricted access to everything.

Bad call. Really bad call. Lawyers, next time, talk to the techs.

Also published at Substack

 

Categories
Political Whatever

Unity Trump meets Chaos Trump and the results aren’t pretty

I don’t listen to speeches I read the transcripts. The transcripts cut through the optics to the substance, and the substance is all I care about.

After Trump’s RNC speech, I went looking for the transcript and found one at a local NBC affiliate. The only problem is, what I was reading in that transcript didn’t match what people were talking about. What the NBC affiliate had posted was the press-release speech that was posted to the teleprompter…not the actual speech with Trump riffs. A whole lot of Trump riffs.

I found the actual speech at the NY Times and copied it. I then  decided to post it here, and note the differences between the two. The question then is: highlight the prepared or highlight the riffs?

The riffs won. And if you want to really know what we’ll get with Trump as President, I’d pay attention to the bold bits.

Categories
Immigration Legal, Laws, and Regs Whatever

US vs Abbott US Response

And in my current favorite legal case, US vs Abbott, the federal government has responded to the reply Texas filed against the demand for a preliminary injunction.

This damn case is such a no brainer. The majority of the buoys are in Mexican territory and must be removed. Mexico has asked the federal government to remove them. This has become a real point of contention between the countries, and causing real harm. End of story.
As for the ‘navigable’ crap, as the filing notes, though portions of the Rio Grande may not be navigable now, they can be made to be navigable. And that’s the true definition of ‘navigable’ according to the laws of our land, though we know that Thomas wants to undermine this understanding.

In addition, there’s all sorts of foreign treaties between us and Mexico related to the river.

Lastly, as the federal government notes, an ‘invasion’ is not individuals seeking to immigrant. An ‘invasion’ according to Congress and US laws is an organized armed attack. And the US government is tasked with protecting the US border, also end of story.

Unless this judge is the worst in the country, and I don’t have reason to believe he is, the damn buoys will finally be removed.

And guess what, kiddos: We’re going to have to pay for it.

Court Document

Categories
Media Political Whatever

Republicans are crazy and the media loves it

Today, more than a dozen publications were featuring a Herschel Walker event in Richmond Hill. He didn’t take his shoes off and start sucking his toes, so, for the most part, the media coverage is positive.

In the meantime, you can’t find one single story on Senator Warnock. Not on him, specifically. You can find several about him and Walker, both. But not about him. I had to go to his campaign web site to find out he’s currently in Atlanta.

That the media can impact the election with this grossly uneven coverage doesn’t matter, because to them, it’s all about eyeballs and clicks. Attention. It’s all about attention. And what generates attention?

Republicans and their never-ending show of crazies: the crazier, the better.

All Walker has to do is show up and he gets attention. Why? Because of the idiotic things he’s said in the past. My particular favorite was the one about bad air from China coming over here, and our good air going over there. I’m less fond of his demand that women obey him when it comes to our healthcare choices—particularly since his philosophy seems to be do what I say, not what I do.

Sure, you say. It’s good to expose idiocy in a Senatorial candidate. Except now, Walker’s minders have him sticking to the script and following the party line. So when he gets media attention now, the news folks can’t help but comment on the fact that Walker showed up, and he acted normal.

The same applies to JD Vance. To Mehmet Oz. To Boebert. To…well, you get the point.

And when the Republican candidates do the crazy, well, that’s OK, too. The media’s right there, except they aren’t. The Republicans do the crazy at audience-friendly pep rallies. And they do the crazy on friendly media shows, like Tucker Carlson’s, where there’s no real questions; never any pushback. In environments where the rest of the media might say, “Well, hold on now…,” the crazy gets put away.

So in rallies, Walker is against any form of abortion, no matter what. But in the studio or the debate, well, he’s no such thing. Whatever the GOP decides here is OK by him. And too many (not all, but too many) in the media just let it all slide…because after all, they’re fair and balanced. Right?

When the media chooses to go along with the Republican ploy—giving attention to the crazies and then normalizing their behavior when they behave—we all lose. We lose fairness in media coverage. We lose fairness in truth in reporting. And with so many Republicans being election deniers, we risk losing our democracy.

But hey, look what I did. I only talked about Walker. My bad. But since we’re talking about Walker and giving Walker attention, I think I’ll let Pastor Jamal Bryant have the last word on Herschel Walker.