Categories
Just Shelley

Birds squabble that’s what they do

The little girl ran into the small room that served as her mother’s home office. Her mother was typing away at the computer, intent on the screen, but that didn’t stop the girl from running up and grabbing hold of her mother’s hand.

“Mama! Mama! Come quick! Something’s wrong with the birds!” the girl cried out, tugging at her mother’s hand, trying to pull her towards the door.

The woman resisted at first, as she had work that needed doing. “Honey, there’s nothing wrong with the birds. The birds are fine.” But the little girl wouldn’t listen and kept tugging at her mother’s hand, calling out the same thing again and again, about “something wrong with the birds.”

The woman, by now bit alarmed by her daughter’s croes, allowed herself to be pulled to her feet, down the hallway, and to the front door.

“Look, Mama! Look at the birds!”

Looking out, the woman noticed that something must have pulled a bag of moldy bread from a garbage can somewhere and left most of the bread in the middle of the road in front of their house. Birds from all over had flocked to this unexpected feast, each trying to get its share.

There were tiny house finches, and morning doves, and an occasional flash of blue from the jays. There were also some chickadees and sparrows in the mix, and some pigeons of course, and in the midst of the flock that aggressor of the scavenger, a couple of seagulls had made their way to the feast.

All the birds were squabbling at each other in a deafening cacophony of sound. No wonder the little girl was alarmed—hearing this raucous noise and seeing the birds fighting among themselves. Rather than be concerned, though, the woman chuckled at the picture: at the seagulls threatening the smaller birds with their large, dangerous beaks but while their backs were turned the finches sneacked in and grabbed pieces, some half again as large as the tiny birds. The smaller birds’ greed was swiftly punished because much of what they stole was stolen in turn by the chickadees and the jays once the bread was safely away from the gulls. In the midst of all this, the morning doves and sparrows quietly pecked away at the crumbs scattered about from all the tugging and jostling.

The woman put her hand on her daughter’s head, and said, “Baby, there’s nothing wrong with the birds. They’re just fighting over some bread in the street.”

At that moment, one of the gulls pecked at a small finch, which managed to duck away from the bigger bird. The little girl pulled back a bit, imagining what would happen if the smaller bird had been hit.

“Mama, are you sure this is normal? What if that bigger bird hurt the little one?”

“Yes, I’m sure. If you’ll look real close, you’ll see that none of the birds are hurting any of the other birds. It’s just a lot of sound and fury is all. Birds do this when they flock around a bit of food.”

“They do?”

“Sure, it’s normal.”

“Shouldn’t we go out and stop them, though? Before someone gets hurt? If they’re fighting over food, I can give them my toast. If I told them I had some toast to share, would they stop squabbling?”

The woman was touched by her daughter’s offer. Kneeling down, she looked into her daughter’s face, into her trusting, young eyes. The woman was filled with a sudden fierce protectiveness. She hoped her daughter would never loose the ability to feel concerned for others when she grew up—even squabbling birds. To never lose the wonder of everyday events. Speaking softly she said, “Honey, if you threw out your toast, the birds would just squabble over it, too. Since you and I can’t speak bird, we have no way of telling them there’s plenty of food for them all.”

She brushed a strand of hair out of her daughter’s face, the same strand that persisted in escaping from the band holding her hair back. “No best to just let the birds be. They’ll eat the bread and once it’s gone, they’ll go their separate ways, no harm done to any of them.”

“Birds squabble, that’s all. That’s what they do.”

Categories
RDF Writing

Book review finished

Recovered from the Wayback Machine.

The public book review period is over.

I wanted to thank all the people who were kind enough to provide comments and feedback about the book. I received more feedback than originally anticipated, overwhelmingly so at times. This does demonstrate the interest in the community.

This wasn’t an easy book to write, not the least of which is re-writing some sections more than once due to changes in the RDF specifications and technologies – moving targets at the best of times.

I hope that the book reflects the different views of RDF within the community, and is comprehensive, as well as living up to its title, “Practical RDF”. We will see.

Thank you again.

Categories
RDF Writing

Mardi Gras Blues

I had hoped to attend the Captain Morgan Mardi Gras parade, but this flu seems to be quite partial to my body, and has decided to take an extended vacation among my various crevices. Right now, I believe it’s paying a protracted visit to my lungs and throat. However, I have high hopes of making it to the traditional Mardi Gras parade Tuesday night, flu or not.

I am determined to pick up one strand of genuine Mardi Gras beads. Just one. Hopefully I won’t have to flash a breast to achieve it.

The enforced stay at home has been productive from a book stand point. I’m finishing up the first round edits in preparation for the chapters being reviewed one more time by a ’subject matter expert’, and then to my editor for the final edits and pre-production readiness.

If you’re interested, I just posted a note about the process in more detail, as well as an HTML version of the first chapter, in the book weblog. The chapter still needs some editing but it’s getting there.

In the edited introductory chapter, I put more focus on the purpose of the book, as well as the section on when to use RDF/XML and when to stay with straight XML. I also incorporated information that explains my interest in RDF/XML.

If I have any edge at all with writing about RDF/XML, it’s that I come from a politically neutral position in the battle between the semantic web folks on one end and the markup folks on the other. I’m neither semantic web nor markup; I’m a data person, with many years of experience working with data at different levels and for different companies. Because of this neutrality, I think I can safely represent all interests or biases in the material. Or perhaps a better way of saying this is: I piss everyone off equally.

But, you know, I can live with this.

Besides, people haven’t necessarily been beating down the doors to write books on RDF. If you go out to Amazon and search on the term ‘RDF’ only a few books get pulled up, and they haven’t been exactly flying off the shelves. Of course, this will change when my book comes out and all of you go out and buy your copies of the book. And, no, Amazon still hasn’t corrected the author list, removing Ray as a co-author. I told you his name would be there forever. Grrr.

As usual when I mention the book, I have to again send kudos to Simon St. Laurent, my editor. This last week he helped me deal with the rather detailed criticism of the book I received from some of my reviewers – something that’s not always easy for an author to absorb.

Simon is what is known in our industry as and a Good Man and a Very Cool Dude. I owe him a box of my favorite chocolates – as soon as I get my advance and can pay for it. Or maybe I should send him a box of Tim Tams?

There’s a funny story associated with the list of books at Amazon on RDF. If you look at this one you’ll see that it’s ‘authored’ by Dan Brickley. The story behind this is that the publisher grabbed the W3C specifications, which were, I believe, public domain or at least allowed this type of re-publication, and then did nothing more than reprint them in the book, exactly. They plunked Dan Brickley’s name on it since he was one of the co-authors of the original specification. This action pissed Mr. Brickley off quite a bit, as you can imagine.

Cheesy thing to do? Damn right it was. But also an excellent example of what can happen to material once it’s in the public domain.

Categories
Copyright RDF Writing

Checking in

Thanks for well wishing. The suggestion of tea was a good one, but unfortunately I can’t drink any acidic juice such as OJ, as it hurts my throat more than a little.

Doing a bit of catch up. There were a couple of items of RDF I had to respond to over at Practical RDF, both of them related to postings from editors on the book. My only comment in addition to my two postings is this: I have a great deal of respect for the RDF Working Group. They worked, hard, to reach Last Call status on the newest RDF specification documents. All that’s left is a few odds and ends, and they can call their job done. It would be a real shame if the group took all that hard work and drop kicked it off a cliff in a burst of tired arrogance at the end of the day.

Liz joined the fun on Creative Commons with a challenge to Jonathon and myself to provide reasons for why not to use the licenses:

 

How ‘bout a “non-shithouse” version of why people might choose not to use the license, that can live side-by-side with the CC discussion of why they should?

Well, you only have to search on “creative commons” among my archives to see my comments, though I’m not sure about their ‘shithouse’ status. I look to Jonathon to provide a better answer to Liz, if he wishes, as the RDF posts took my time tonight, and I’m to bed. However, it seems to me that if Creative Commons is to be effective, it’s up the members of the CC to detail the problems associated with the CC licenses as well as the advantages. I’ve pointed out to a couple of members the writing that Tim Hadley has done; hopefully they’ll consider writing a post or two on these issues to go with all the postings about this artist or that blogger that has attached a CC license to their work.

I was more interested in responding to the discussion Liz and Dorothea are having about about academia. Specifically, I wanted to pursue the thread off this conversation that Baldur started:

 

Everybody speaks the same, in the same way, about the same thing, with little to no variation. We could easily turn into the lightspeed version of the same unsubstantiated bullshit of postmodern academia, shedding even the pretense of giving ideas space and scope for discussion.

What killed the author and poisoned academia is trying to return through the violated corpses of a horde of ’blogger-zombies spouting inane commentary on the links of the day.

But as the popularity of weblogging increases, the number of meme-victims will rise and the blogdex top fifty will not only describe the fifty most popular subjects amongst webloggers…

It will describe the only subjects.

What I’ve tried to say in a thousand words, Baldur said in a few. I wanted to write in response, but lacked the energy to respond well. I couldn’t do justice to Baldur’s words.

But when I’m well, and have the energy to respond, to do Baldur’s writing true justice, should I?

Categories
Just Shelley

Down for the count

I thought I was lucky, getting only a mild case of flu and missing out on the misery Steve and AKMA and Halley and Loren and others have endured. I found out this morning that what I had this weekend was nothing more than a precursor for the real thing.

I’ve spent the day alternating between sleep and some over-due reading, too much of the former, not enough of the latter. I’d like to catch up on the reading (“Burning the Days”, “Happinesstm“, and “Austerlitz”), but I’d rather not be sick.