Categories
Government Media

We’re the news, now

Yesterday, four longtime and faithful employees of the federal government were fired SOLELY because they were doing the job they were delegated to do, paying out funds specifically allocated by Congress.

And the funds that were distributed—funds allocated to New York City to help pay for the thousands of migrants bused to the city by Texas governor Abbott—were illegally, removed from the city’s accounts.

Yet today, the media is full of the “win” that the Trump administration had, because a lawsuit challenging the ‘fork in the road’ payout was tossed—not because there wasn’t a problem with what Trump/Musk are doing, but because the harm hasn’t yet happened. Courts are reactive, not anticipatory. The plaintiffs (union) lacked standing because they couldn’t show direct harm to the union, itself. Yet.

In addition, Judge O’Toole also noted he lacked jurisdiction over the case. To support his decision, he referenced a previous court decision written by current SCOTUS Kustice Jackson, that constrains the interaction between union and the federal government, including designating the National Labor Relations Board as the body to hear disputes between union and government.

It is only after the NLRB holds hearings, investigates, and makes a decision can the union then, and only then, challenge the NLRB decision in the DC district court. Because this lawsuit fell outside this process, Judge O’Toole lacked jurisdiction over the case.

This isn’t a win based on whether what Musk is doing is legal or not. This is one avenue to stop Musk closed while others are still open. In addition, real harm is now occurring with the firings of the four employees for doing their Congressionally mandated job. Real harm is occurring with the firings at the CFPB and USAID. And real harm will also happen once other federal employees with federals protections are fired—not for cause, but because Trump/Musk are trying to kill entire federal departments using attrition.

But none of what I just mentioned easily falls into a single social media post does it? There is no easily defined impact to the citizen sitting at home glancing through the headlines, or reading the chyrons scrolling across the bottom of their TV.

Clickbait.

There is a level of wonkiness required for understanding how the federal government works, as well as how it fits within our system of checks and balances. It’s not easy explaining how today’s fired employee means that the price of corn will go up and you’ll pay more in the store next year, because you have to walk through much of the guts of federal activity to get from point A to point Z. And this isn’t a sexy walk.

On the one hand, Trump and Musk have no problem with lying about their actions, or lying about the results because they know the only thing that matters is what appears in headlines or fits within an X-witter twip. Whatever you may think of these two men, they are masters at manipulating the press.

On the other hand, those of us fighting Trump/Musk to salvage as much of our government as we can, must take time to explain why the actions Trump/Musk are taking are both illegal and harmful—using concepts and referencing laws that can be both obscure and complex, all to a nation of folks who seemingly have a strongly adverse reaction to civics.

Not clickbait.

So, while the larger news organizations follow whatever crumbs dropped by Trump/Musk, smaller news organizations and people on the street, like you and me, are going to have to pick up the slack. We’re the news now.

No matter how big or small our audiences, we have to write about what’s happening in our current administration. Wonky? Sure. Complex? OK. Not Pulitzer Prise winning? Well, I wouldn’t count out Wired’s coverage of what’s happening to boots on the ground in the federal government, but yeah, no gold star for the rest of us.

And whether you write or not, it’s up to all of us to ensure that the spotlight hits on what needs to be covered—not on the sparkly, eye-catching clickbait that comes out at both the White House and X-witter.

It’s simple. Make noise. Make a lot of noise. Continue making noise.

And make sure folks hear it.

 

 

 

 

Categories
Media Political

Georgia media: this is no time for neutrality

In the last week, the LA Times and the Washington Post—both owned by billionaires with no newspaper experience—gave notice they wouldn’t publish an editorial endorsing a presidential candidate.

Both publications had endorsements ready to go. Both endorsed Kamala Harris. But in each case, the rich guy owning the paper defaulted to his personal financial interests rather than uphold editorial independence and integrity. And both have suffered losses, as employees have quit and subscribers have cancelled. More importantly, the have lost credibility.

The excuse given is some form of ‘neutrality’, which comes across as disingenuous, at best. There is no neutrality in this election. We have two candidates whose vision for this country differs so drastically, one can’t help wonder if we’ve crossed into another dimension of space and time when comparing the two.

Kamala Harris is for a country to remain strong into the future, while Trump has built his campaign on lies, more lies, and an ugly view of the country and its people that should sicken any decent human being.

When you have all but a few of the nation’s economists coming out in favor of the Democratic candidate, you know the Republican contender is bad. Really bad. His economic proposals based on deporting millions of migrant workers and setting massive tariffs on all goods coming into the country will send us beyond a recession directly into a depression.

(Not to mention setting the Social Security fund clock back several years, so that we face a crisis in funding in a scant six years from now.)

Morally, Trump is corrupt. He’s a malignant narcissist. And he’s consistently demonstrated how dangerously incapable he is of leading our country.

He literally cares for no one but himself, and has surrounded himself with self-serving toadies such as Elon Musk and RFK Jr, both whom can’t wait to destroy our country’s foundations. As for his co-partner in crime, JD. Vance, this man isn’t even liked by his own party—a vapid, gormless chimera basically considered the also-ran of the Trump ticket.

And potentially the next President if Trump decides to serve out his term doddering around his golf courses.

Our precious civil rights have suffered unbelievable damage solely because of the judges Trump has appointed to courts. The only thing that has held back this slide into the dark ages has been President Biden and his administration, as well as Democratically-elected state leaders and nonprofit organizations. And a few good judges, even Republican-appointed ones, who remembered they’re actually here to serve the law, not their own ideological fantasies.

With a Trump Presidency, the destruction of  our country will be complete. He will continue to remove rights for women, for the LGBTQ+ community, for people of color, and even for people of religions other than the dominant evangelical religion. He will continue to appoint the worst judges, who will gleefully pull down Madam Justice and kick her into the dirt.

He will destroy what is now a booming economy, and he will sledgehammer our civil rights.

If he wins, white racist bigots will celebrate in the streets, while the rest of us desperately search for safe havens. And he will pursue us in these safe havens in his quest for revenge…promising to use both the DOJ and the military against us.

This is no time for faux ‘neutrality’. This is a time for all good and decent people to realize that we are at a decisive moment: one choice leads to hope and a determined effort to stitch together the torn fabric of our society; the other choice leads to a darkness I can’t even comprehend.

The LA Times and the Washington Post have failed in their duty to their readers. I hope that the Georgia media does not follow their lead.

Categories
Media Political

That Debate Thing

And this is what I waited for: The text transcript of the debate.

Trump didn’t become unhinged during the debate, he was unhinged from the start. He just got louder and more bellicose during the debate. And VP Harris played him like a fiddle.

From the transcript…people have to stop calling him President Trump. It’s either former President Trump or Mr. Trump. Journalists who don’t do this are doing everyone a disservice.

The moderators didn’t control Trump as well as they should. He was able to give rebuttals that weren’t allowed under the rules. He told Harris at one point to basically shut up.

I did, however, appreciate them actually doing some fact checking. And the push back and willingness to bring a topic back up because Trump didn’t answer the question. I thought they did a decent job. They could have done better, but considering Trump I think they did the best they could.

Did Kamala Harris fudge some stuff? Yup, and I have no problem with it. When the media normalizes what Trump says, and he lies continuously, it’s past time for us to make the points that really need to be made. I hate to say it but politics in this day is all about sound bites, and we need to realize this or continue to cede control of the country to Trump, DeSantis, Abbott, Marjorie Taylor Greene, and their like.

There was nothing of substance in this debate, because substance doesn’t work when you’re running against a fraud like Trump. It certainly doesn’t work with a Republican party like it is today. Hilary Clinton tried to focus on substance in her debate with Trump, as Biden did with his. It doesn’t work. Until Republicans actually have a candidate who isn’t a serial liar like Trump, debates are sound bites and gotchas.

Harris and her team know how to campaign against Trump. And the media isn’t altogether happy about it.

PS: No one is eating anyone’s pet in Springfield, Ohio.

Debate transcript

Categories
Media Photography

Silent Sunday July 7 2024

Categories
Media Political Whatever

Republicans are crazy and the media loves it

Today, more than a dozen publications were featuring a Herschel Walker event in Richmond Hill. He didn’t take his shoes off and start sucking his toes, so, for the most part, the media coverage is positive.

In the meantime, you can’t find one single story on Senator Warnock. Not on him, specifically. You can find several about him and Walker, both. But not about him. I had to go to his campaign web site to find out he’s currently in Atlanta.

That the media can impact the election with this grossly uneven coverage doesn’t matter, because to them, it’s all about eyeballs and clicks. Attention. It’s all about attention. And what generates attention?

Republicans and their never-ending show of crazies: the crazier, the better.

All Walker has to do is show up and he gets attention. Why? Because of the idiotic things he’s said in the past. My particular favorite was the one about bad air from China coming over here, and our good air going over there. I’m less fond of his demand that women obey him when it comes to our healthcare choices—particularly since his philosophy seems to be do what I say, not what I do.

Sure, you say. It’s good to expose idiocy in a Senatorial candidate. Except now, Walker’s minders have him sticking to the script and following the party line. So when he gets media attention now, the news folks can’t help but comment on the fact that Walker showed up, and he acted normal.

The same applies to JD Vance. To Mehmet Oz. To Boebert. To…well, you get the point.

And when the Republican candidates do the crazy, well, that’s OK, too. The media’s right there, except they aren’t. The Republicans do the crazy at audience-friendly pep rallies. And they do the crazy on friendly media shows, like Tucker Carlson’s, where there’s no real questions; never any pushback. In environments where the rest of the media might say, “Well, hold on now…,” the crazy gets put away.

So in rallies, Walker is against any form of abortion, no matter what. But in the studio or the debate, well, he’s no such thing. Whatever the GOP decides here is OK by him. And too many (not all, but too many) in the media just let it all slide…because after all, they’re fair and balanced. Right?

When the media chooses to go along with the Republican ploy—giving attention to the crazies and then normalizing their behavior when they behave—we all lose. We lose fairness in media coverage. We lose fairness in truth in reporting. And with so many Republicans being election deniers, we risk losing our democracy.

But hey, look what I did. I only talked about Walker. My bad. But since we’re talking about Walker and giving Walker attention, I think I’ll let Pastor Jamal Bryant have the last word on Herschel Walker.