Categories
Photography

B & W or color

Some photographers focus on black & white photography, others color, but many are like me and we’ll use both depending on the circumstances.

For myself, I’ve seen a photo in color that’s uninteresting until you desaturate it, reducing it to greys, blacks, and whites, and then it takes on life and interest. Conversely, other photos need the color; otherwise important detail is lost.

These photos were from a hike along the Katy Trail, in and around Rocheport, Missouri. I show both color and B & W images, so that you can see the difference when using one or the other. I’ve found that when I want to add a surreal quality to a photo — to build on the emotion — I always use B & W. However, when I want to focus more on the subject of the photo, I tend to use color.

Rocheport River

Two slightly different photos of the same river/creek that feeds into the Missouri river, right outside the Rocheport Tunnel. The scene looks good regardless of whether it’s in color or not, but the B & W tends to wash much of the warmth out of the photo.

rocheportriver.jpg

rocheportriverbw.jpg

Tunnel Entrance

This is a case where removing the color harms the photo, in my opinion. I believe that the colors of the rock and the leaves actually add detail, and the B & W comes off more flat, less interesting.

Of course, this is, again, my opinion.

tunnel1.jpg

tunnel1bw.jpg

In Stone

This photo is of a crack in the limestone cliffs, and is next to a dwelling actually made into this crack. I hide the dwelling behind these leaves in this photo — you can see the images at the Burningbird Images site for more detail.

In this case, the colors are flat because of the lack of sun — I think that B & W is much superior, and gives a interesting feel to the photo.

stonehole.jpg

stonehole2.jpg

No Choice

Two completely different photos to demonstrate that, sometimes, there is no option. A photo would be useless without color, or a B & W would be material for the garbage can if in color.

The first photo is of a pretty bug that landed on the back of my gold car, and the photo’s colors highlight the contrast. I have no idea what this bug is, but it was very tenacious. Even when I lifted the trunk lid to put my purse in the trunk, it maintained its grip.

prettybug.jpg

This photo is from inside the Rocheport Tunnel, looking towards the entrance. The light difference was extreme, and in color, it would be a muddy mess. However, in B & W, the effect is dramatic, even extreme. Many wouldn’t like this photo, but I love it — it was one of my favorites.

tunnel2.jpg

Categories
Photography Places

The Owl’s Song

The point along the Katy Trail most recommended is the area around Rocheport, and in particular, the Rocheport Tunnel. This was my goal last week when I left early in the morning to get to the town before the Missouri mid-day heat. But what started out in the heat of day, ended up in the cold, dark reaches of indian lore before this journey was over.

The Rocheport Tunnel is near the town but I wasn’t sure which way to head from the parking lot; I picked the direction to my left, which was wrong, of course. However, this stretch of the trail leads by the Missouri and past several handsome limestone cliffs, and the time spent exploring wasn’t a waste.

Katy really is a biking trail and I was the only walker among several cyclists out and about. Since the trail is long, I can see why bikes would be handy, but I think the cyclists miss the specialness of this trail by moving along at the faster speeds, view focused ahead on the loose limestone paths. The area around Rocheport is especially rich with character, and I seemed to be the only recipient of its mysteries, as I would stop and peer about at this break in the foliage, that interesting view — forming a kind of movable hazard for the bikers along the way.

Of course the Missouri river’s always fun to walk beside, and this is one of the few places along the Katy Trail where both were together rather than being separated by a strip of farmland and trees.

There was a underground stream that broke through the cliff wall at one point, behind some bushes, but you couldn’t see it unless you’re walking along; leisurely walking along at that, paying attention to your surroundings rather than burning fat on your thighs. When I stopped to check it out more closely, I found an old MKT (Missouri, Kansas, and Texas) Railway mark, sealed into the side of the hill.

mark

In another spot I found a break in the bushes along the side of the trail and a path that led to what looked like an old abandoned stone home that had literally been built into the side of the hill underneath an overhang. Next to it was another split in the wall, and I couldn’t help thinking that the place would have to be a natural home for black bear in the winter.

In the winter, yeah, and this is summer and Missouri bears are regular teddies, but I still only went so close to both dwellings. I wouldn’t walk up to them, peer in. It wasn’t because of the bears, as much as it was that the dwellings had a odd feel to them, and there was no mention of them in any of the Katy Trail guides. Maybe there’s a reason and a risk?

Fanciful thoughts that Missouri seems to grow as plentifully as it grows the Green.

Stone Home

As interesting as the trail was, after a while — a hour or so — I realized I went the wrong way and turned back. I killed some time in town, getting an ice tea, chatting with some of the cyclists (finding all sorts of new trails to try, thanks to their suggestions), and finally headed towards the Tunnel.

Of course, the Tunnel is right on the Trail, at the very edge of the town only ten minutes from the parking lot. By this time of day, the weather was hot under the mid-day sun and I was looking forward to the shade of the Tunnel. Still, when I crossed the bridge over the tributary leading to the Missouri, and approached the entrance, I again experienced that same unease and reluctance to enter as I experienced earlier with the stone dwellings.

Entrance

It wasn’t because I was afraid of the dark or the Tunnel — you can see the other end easily, the Tunnel is obviously solid and sound, and people are all about. Nothing to fear, but I had to push myself to enter.

(Using self-taunts of “Big Baby afraid of the dark, eh? Whimp.” to goad myself the entire time.)

I figured once I was in, I’d have no problems. I’ve been in caves and tunnels before, some a lot deeper, darker, and longer than this tunnel. However, I remained uncomfortable the entire time, and kept looking up over my head, behind me, glancing at the sides of the cave out of the corner of my eye.

Have you ever been in a place where you can feel the walls? Not that they’re closing in, as you would experience with claustrophobia; they just seem to be there, radiating their existence. I think if I had closed my eyes and held my arms out, I could have walked dead down the center of that Tunnel just by “feeling” the sides of it around me.

Follow the Light

The interior was very dark, so I used the flash to take a couple of pictures. No hesitation on using it, what was I going to disturb? Rocks? Stone? There was nothing in the cave. Look at the photo — can you see anything in the cave but rock?

The entrance was rough rock, but the roof of the Tunnel is old hand hewn brick. Considering it’s over a hundred years old, the stability of the work is rather impressive. At the other end of the Tunnel, the entrance was cut stone — pretty in fact. I stayed outside to admire it for a while, exploring the other side of the Tunnel. Still, it was hot, and I was tired. Home it was.

Entering the Tunnel was easier going back, but if there had been any way around the Tunnel, I think I would have taken it. Self-taunts aside. Hard to figure, too, because I love tunnels.

There wasn’t anyone around returning back through the Tunnel, so I was able to hear the noise easily. Two sounds: the high pitched squeek of a bat and an owl.

The bat didn’t surprise me and I figured the flash may have disturbed it. I’m not worried about bats, and have always considered them to be rather cute, but I was surprised by the owl. There are several species of owls in the state, but it’s rare that you ever stumble on any of them unless you have a barn, or go walking around in the forest at night. No one goes out walking in the forest at night in Missouri.

The sound of the bat and the owl overcame my nervousness and I quickly entered more deeply into the tunnel, hoping to get a glance of one or the other. As I walked, I examining the ceiling overhead and the rocks at the side, trying to find a crevice big enough for a bird. Nothing,

Just as I started walking under the rough rock portion of the cave I heard a rustle and looking up, I spotted the movement of a bird among the rocks. But it was a pigeon, not an owl, or a bat. A pigeon that landed on a protruding bit of rock leading between the rough portion of the cave and the smooth, almost as if it were a guardian saying, “You’ve been this way before.” Yeah, go back.

Odd that mistake with the sound. I can usually differentiate between a pigeon and a owl, or a pigeon and a bat. Still, I couldn’t see anything else, and perhaps the echoes in the Tunnel distorted the sound enough to make it sound like an owl.

tunnel1.jpg

I was curious about the Tunnel and when I got home, I decided to do a little research into it’s history. And what a history that bit of land has.

It would seem that the hill that the Tunnel went through was very well known in the 1800’s, and figured prominently in Lewis and Clark’s expedition journals. At that time, the hill was called Manitou Bluff because of the huge cave drawings painted along the sides of the limestone cliffs.

From the Ozark Avalon magazine:

The term Manitou was applied to human-like figures that were included with other images — often with what appeared to be antlers emerging from their heads — in rock paintings, or pictographs, that unknown Native American artists placed on prominent projecting rocks or on the faces of bluffs.
,,,
These Manitou Bluffs, covered as they were with mysterious and undecipherable symbols and images, excited the imaginations of the American, French, and other European travelers who first encountered them. Some of these observers even speculated that the pictograph groups, especially those containing Manitous, were pictorial representations of spiritual concepts held sacred by the unknown Native American artists who inched their way along narrow rock ledges high above the ground to execute their paintings. The observers suspected that the rock paintings marked these cliffs as places particularly favored by a higher spiritual being (or Manitou) and, therefore, invested with sacred powers.

One expedition member, Sergeant John Ordway, wrote:

“We passed a high clifts of Rocks on which was painted the Pickture of the Deavel.”

We passed a high clifts of Rocks on which was painted the Pickture of the Deavel…. Picture of the Devil.

During the 1800’s the Manitou Bluffs were a common attraction among those that traveled the Missouri river during this golden age of river transportation. This was the era of Mark Twain and Huckleberry Finn, with steam boats speeding elegantly past barges and bargemen poling along the sides. Rocheport was a popular destination for these travelers, as well as a trading spot for French trappers, earlier.

Rocheport, or, translated — Rock Port. Rock Port, for the limestone cliffs and the Manitou paintings.

For Sale

Of course this idyllic era ended in a burst of efficiency when the railway came through at beginning of the 1900’s. Railmen didn’t see pictographs, or spiritual symbols in the cliffs overlooking Rocheport — they saw a hill that had to be moved through, and move they did. With dynamite and rough pick, the hole was dug, and the pictures, what were considered the best of their kind, were gone.

Drawings were made of the pictographs before they were destroyed. According to the Ozark Avalon:

Future generations are lucky that Teubner made his drawings when he did, for a devastating chapter in the Manitou Bluffs saga was about to take place in the form of the Missouri-Kansas-Texas (Katy) Railroad, which began in 1892 to construct its St. Louis branch along the north side of the river. Construction crews showed no mercy for the aboriginal landmarks that had so fascinated early adventurers. As much as a hundred tons of bluff rock could be brought down with a single charge of powerful explosives. If any trace of the pictographs at Big Moniteau Creek were still visible when the railroad blasted its tunnel through the bluff at Rocheport, none has been seen since. A decade later, the Missouri Pacific built its line on the south side of the river and in the process may have destroyed all or a portion of the Little Manitou Rock. There have been no observations of the Little Manitou pictograph since Duke Paul wrote about seeing it in 1823. Not only did the railroads sound the death knell for the golden era of river transportation but they probably also literally destroyed some of the most mysterious human traces of a vanished age — the strange symbols that had excited the imagination of many river wanders who are themselves now part of a lost and romantic era.

I tried to locate the name of the people that made the drawings, but there was no identification of tribe with the descriptions of the rocks. At the time, though, the Osage land overlapped from Oklahoma into Missouri, and there’s a good chance it was Osage. This makes sense, the Osage are a very spiritual people, and they are identified with other pictographs in the area.

Coming from a town that bordered the Colville Indian Reservation, meeting other people from other tribes over time, I’ve always been fascinated and interested in Native American lore and culture. The Osage are probably one of the most fascinating of the tribes, with a rich heritage and significant history. Other tribes feared them because they were a cunning people, capable warriors, and tall — most averaging 6 feet in height, and this during a time when average heights were about 5 1/2 feet.

Though pushed about by the long knives, the white man, as with other tribes, the Osage held its own more than others. Additionally, as I said earlier, they are a very spiritual people with fascinating stories and legends surviving through the ages. Among the many Osage beliefs is that of little people. Supernatural spirits.

Of course, coming from Irish ancestry, I know the little people, and I’m sure you do also, coming from whatever people you call your own. Mine were friendly and mischievous, jokers, pranksters but with no real harm to them. However, the same cannot be said for the Osage Little People, all of whom were Osage who died without paint, and without honor. They were the mialuschka, the Lost Souls.

The Osage Little People are treated with both respect and fear because unlike friendly spirits, they are vindictive, dangerous, even deadly. They walk the earth hungry and full of hatred for their unsettled state and they would like nothing better than to add to their ranks from among those they consider their prey. This would include any who desecrate their holy lands — burial and other ceremonial lands. Lands that Osage shaman would sometimes paint with great big pictures, of Manitou and other creatures.

The Little People might be content with playing a prank, or scaring their Prey. They might spoil food, or chase a skunk into a home. But their pranks could become deadly — trees falling on a windless day, or rocks falling down from a cliff with no creatures present. If the Little People were very angry, the Prey would have to get a blessing from a Shaman, and even then, that would sometimes not be enough to turn aside their wrath.

The thing with the Little People, only an Osage Shaman can sense their presence — a Shaman or the sometimes the Prey themselves. If you were such a one you might see them as indians dressed in the native costume of the time. Hair shaved into a mohawk, blanket wrapped, face without paint. Dead eyes, burning with the light of night.

Sometimes, though, you won’t see the Little People as people, but they’re still about. They have another guise, that of a bird. An owl to be exact. And you’ll know they’re around you, when they’re looking at you, when they’ve spotted you as prey, when you hear the owl’s song.

Categories
Photography Weblogging

Faux photoblog

Recovered from the Wayback Machine.

Six Apart has announced the preliminary release of TypePad, a hosted solution for those people partial to Movable Type. Prices look pretty decent, low enough to be competitive, but not so low that there’s thousands of weblogs on one server.

Among the features is HTML-free templating, moblogging, automated FOAF generation from the blogroll (hmmm – don’t agree with this one), as well as the ability to show what you’re reading and listening to. The best decision Six Apart made with TypePad was pointing the weblogger’s domain names at their weblogs. Depending on the web server used, this is a very doable thing, and I think other hosted solutions are going to have to look at this as an option.

One of the functionalities that TypePad has that Movable Type doesn’t is a ‘photoblog’, photography weblogging setup. I imagine this will interest quite a few folks who already have their own hosted MT sites. I liked the look and feel of many of the photoblogs I looked at, such as Joi Ito’s San Francisco photos, so I set out to re-create the look in a Movable Type weblog called MT Faux PhotoBlog. Once I figured out the templates, it was quite easy to create the album, and I may do this for other photo albums.

How does it work? The solution requires that the server have ImageMagick, and the ImageMagick Perl wrapper installed. Otherwise you’ll need to create your thumbnails yourself.

Categories are created for each photo, sans the photo extension. For instance, a photo such as tunnel.jpg would have a category called ‘tunnel’. When the photo is uploaded, it’s uploaded as a separate entry, and a thumbnail is created. When I create the thumbnails, I don’t constrain the image proportions, so that I can create square thumbnails. In the Faux PhotoBlog, I’m using thumbnails of 120 x 120px sizes.

To get the front page, I replaced the traditional MT entry listing with the following:

<div id=”content” style=”align: center”>
<div class=”blog” >

<MTEntries lastn=”20″>
<a href=”<$MTEntryPermalink$>”><img src=”<$MTBlogURL$>photos/<$MTEntryCategory$>-thumb.jpg” alt=”<$MTEntryTitle$>” class=”mainpage” /></a>
</MTEntries>

</div>
</div>

What this template code does is create the URL for the image by concatenating the category name, with the blog URL and photo thumbnail filename extension (jpg). Instead of category, you could also use entry title, but then this forces it into a title that might not be descriptive. Instead, I used entry title for the ALT tag for the image, and reserve category for the filename.

To force the images to line up and wrap without using an HTML table I created an img CSS class to use with the images that sets the image to inline display:

img.mainpage {
display: inline;
margin: 5px 5px 5px 5px }

I also gave the images 5px of space around them on each side. All the images are given a border, in this case a solid grey one.

(If your browser doesn’t support display:inline, you can also surround each photo with a SPAN tag, as this forces the image inline. However, if you do this, make sure your outer DIV block doesn’t have left padding or margin, or you’ll get uneven wrapping.)

This takes care of the main page. For each individual page, to get the lined up thumbnails, I used the following:

<div class=”side”>
<MTEntries lastn=”20″>
<a href=”<$MTEntryPermalink$>”><img src=”<$MTBlogURL$>photos/<$MTEntryCategory$>-thumb.jpg” alt=”<$MTEntryTitle$>” width=”50″ style=”margin-bottom: 10px” /></a><br />
</MTEntries>
</div>

I’m using the browser resize capability – resizing the thumbnails from 120 down to 50. However, that’s something you can change. It just seems to match the PhotoBlog look. Additionally, in this setup, I only list the most recent 20 photos, but you can change this, on the front page and in the sidebars.

That’s it. Then, to add a new photo, just upload a new photo, make sure you create and upload a square thumbnail the same name as your original photo with a ‘-thumb’ appended, and name the category for the photo the same name as the image file:

photo: tunnel.jpg
thumbnail: tunnel-thumb.jpg
category: tunnel

You’ll need to rebuild all entries each time you add a new photo, otherwise it won’t show in the sidebar. Chances are, you’ll want to consider keeping your photo albums smaller, less than 100 photos.

TypePad’s photo album feature probably has a lot more features, but for those of us on MT, at least we can capture the look.

(Access the individual and main index templates, and stylesheet. )

update 

Well, I left parts out, didn’t I? When you upload a photo, have MT create a new entry and use the embedded photo option. If you have the software installed, also have it create the thumbnail for you at the same time – making sure not to constrain the proportion, and make the thumbnail square.

In the entry, delete everything but the URL for the photo, converting it into an img instead of a hypertext link if you used a thumbnail when creating the entry.

Alternatively you can just create a fresh entry, and add the image yourself – but you’ll then have to provide a thumbnail. If you do, remember to name the thumbnail imagename-thumb. Don’t try and constrain the photo itself as a thumbnail using width and height in the img tag, unless the photo is square to begin with – browsers don’t do a great job of converting a big rectangular photo into an itty bitty square thumbnail.

To make the photos display properly, you’ll also want to change the chronological order to forward chronology, not the typical reverse chronological order of most weblogs.

Thanks to Al for correction to my earlier statement: MT will create thumbnails if you have either ImageMagick or NetPBM installed. Ask your ISP if you’re not sure.

And if you have problems, holler.

Categories
Photography

Welcome sign

stayout.jpg

Categories
Photography

Al-l-l-most

leafdrop1.jpg