Categories
Government Healthcare The Democratic Difference Whatever

Democrats: what exactly are you angry about?

People are angry because 8 Democratic Senators voted with Republicans to pass a continuing resolution and re-open the government. The measure now goes to the House where, if Johnson remembers where he left the key to open the doors, it’s likely to pass.

Democrats are furious with the Democrats who joined with the Republicans. Oh, not the Republicans for not negotiating with us. Not with Johnson for keeping the House shut down.

No, all the anger is directed at Senate Democrats, because they did not keep up the fight.

I can understand. I was pretty disappointed myself. I really wanted to see us push back on the harm Trump has been doing to the country; to show he’s not the boss of all of us. And I wanted us to help the millions of people who are about to lose their no longer affordable healthcare.

We ended up shutting the government down for 40 days and seemingly have nothing to show for it. Wow, Senate Democrats…you suck.

Except there’s a part of me that knows we had only two choices at this point: We could continue the government shut down until Trump gets his way, and the Senate Republicans kill the filibuster; or we could vote for the CR, without the healthcare subsidies. There are no other options.

We knew these were the only options when Schumer made his offer of a deal last week: that Democrats would drop all other demands in exchange for getting the healthcare subsidies. This was a good deal for Republicans. After all, a whole lot of Republican voters are now facing higher insurance costs, and the subsidies have overwhelming support with both Republicans and Democrats. The Republicans could also claim that they got Democrats to drop all other demands and re-opened the government.

But they didn’t take the deal. They not only didn’t take the deal, their faux outrage and instant rejection told us there was no deal Democrats could offer that Republicans would take. They wanted complete capitulation and they were willing to keep the government shut down as long as it took to get the Democrats to give up. To them, the greater harm was bipartisanship.

People keep talking about how Congressional Democrats don’t seem to understand how things have changed with Trump, and they have to change what they do to fight him. But we, on the outside of Congress looking in, also need to understand that things have changed. There’s a new math in play.

You have, on one side of an equation, us. On the other side, you have a group of people who only care about one thing: holding power. They don’t care about anything else.

They don’t care that we can’t afford healthcare. They don’t care if hungry people get fed. They don’t care if planes fly on time. They certainly don’t care that the federal government continues to function.

Once upon a time, they may have cared about these things, or a minimum, cared about the optics of voters not getting fed, not having healthcare, being able to safely travel, and have a functioning government. But people voted for Trump and he promised none of this, and this sent a message to today’s Republicans: the only thing that matters is holding power and the way to hold power is by pleasing Trump, and the best way to please Trump is hurting Democrats.

How to hurt Democrats? Well, basically, you hurt the people of this country: the more vulnerable the people, the better.

Nothing else matters.

So, wise and wonderful pundits who have been nammering for two days about the awful Democratic senators, how exactly do you negotiate successfully with a people who see no harm coming from doing nothing? No, let me rephrase the question: How exactly can you fight people like this without also harming the people of this country?

When you have a President and party in control that don’t give a damn about anything else but themselves, everything that we thought we knew about responsible governance goes out the door.

House Democrats can easily fight Republicans just by not voting for anything the Republicans want to pass, because we can be fairly confident that whatever they want won’t be any good. House Democrats can always dance on the side of angels.

Senate Democrats, though, are hindered by this thing called a filibuster, which requires 60 votes to pass anything in the Senate. It’s an outdated, outmoded idea that invariably harms the Democrats, and frankly, the people of this country, more than it constrains the Republicans. We should have dumped it when we had a chance, but didn’t.

But, we still have the filibuster. And because we do, Senate Democrats have basically two choices from now on: either a small subset throws themselves on the sword and votes to continue funding the government and keeping it functioning; or they all go for broke—do nothing for potentially several months, until Trump bullies Senate Republicans into dropping the filibuster to end the shutdown.

Either choice has consequences. Funding the government means people will lose healthcare. But not funding the government until the Republicans decide to blow up the filibuster means people still don’t have affordable healthcare, but we also have a badly broken government from being nonfunctioning for so long, and a severely harmed vulnerable population. And Senate Republicans can finally do the things they’ve wanted to do but couldn’t because of the filibuster:

  • Make it difficult to vote
  • Make life hell for the trans community
  • Kill or maim the Affordable Care Act
  • Starve SNAP, and diminish Medicaid even more
  • Attack vaccines, prohibit abortions nationally, and kill birth control
  • Cut taxes even more for the wealthy
  • Destroy most government functionality, particularly the components that regulate commerce and industries
  • Undermine academic freedom
  • Expand the military and federal police organizations
  • Push up the age in which a person can access Social Security and Medicare

Well, the list goes on. All you have to do is listen to the Trump administration folks and Congressional Republicans on Sunday talk shows to see the world they want to create. Or re-read the Project 2025 manifesto.

I used to think that Republicans had enough survival instincts to know that doing all of this will ultimately result in them losing power, but…people voted for Trump a second time. We no longer live in a rational universe.

As much as I think the filibuster harms Democratic goals, thank goodness we have it now.

Once the Republicans turned down the Schumer proposal, we knew there was nothing we could offer that the Republicans wanted. Their entire purpose now is to please Trump, because they see this as the way of holding onto power. And Trump has no problems inflicting maximum harm on the country to get his way, and his way is total domination of Democrats and complete subjugation of the country.

Other than being annoyed because nasty journalists keep asking him questions about it, Trump could care less that the country is shut down. It doesn’t stop him from building monuments to himself. It doesn’t stop his migrant pogrom. It certainly doesn’t stop him funding what he wants to fund, regardless of what Congress does.

It might be satisfying to keep the government shut down because it gives us the illusion we hold Congressional power, but we really don’t. Not unless we’re willing to sacrifice people who need food, who need to be paid, who are under threat of losing cars and homes, because of the shutdown.

The power we do have is our resistance, but never to the point of harming people who don’t deserve to be harmed. But, we can resist much in Congress without harming folks, and we should. We can resist much in the streets, and we will. We can resist when we vote, and we must.

Most importantly, we can remember exactly who it is we are resisting, and never let the pundits tell us otherwise.

When voters see their healthcare double at the end of the year, it won’t be because of a choice eight Democrats made, but because this is the choice 52 Republicans made. When people get their SNAP benefits, federal workers get their jobs back and get paid, and the country is functioning again, it won’t be because 52 Republicans voted, but because eight Democrats did.

Categories
Government Legal, Laws, and Regs The Democratic Difference

It is none of our damn business

My Dad, who was a Republican, would have liked Tim Walz. He would have liked Walz’s plain speaking. He would have admired his bluntness, especially when Walz says that a woman’s right to choose is none of our damn business. He would have liked it because that’s exactly what my Dad used to say.

When Dad and I talked about things like abortion, his philosophy was, “It’s none of my business what happens between a woman and a doctor. This is no one’s business but the woman and her doctor.”

He felt the same thing about same-sex marriage: it was none of his business. I know he would feel the same thing about trans treatment: it was none of his business.

He took that same belief to what he expected from his elected representatives: interfering in a woman’s right to healthcare isn’t the government’s business. Whether a woman has an abortion or not isn’t the business of the state legislature. Or Congress. They have work to do that is their business, and abortion, same-sex marriage,  pronoun use, trans healthcare, what books people read … none of these are their damn business.

My Dad was born in 1910. He didn’t always understand why a woman would want an abortion, but her having one, was none of his business. He didn’t fully understand the LGBTQ+ community, but he never expressed disapproval of any member of the community because it wasn’t his business to approve or disapprove. He felt he didn’t have the right to make judgements on how other people lived as long as how they lived didn’t hurt anyone else.

It was none of his damn business. And he fought in World War II as part of the 82nd Airborne to ensure that others didn’t interfere where they had no right to be.

Now, please take some time to watch Lawrence O’Donnell rip apart today’s media in one of his most eloquent and important video appearances, ever. Because he’s telling the media what is their business, and that they are failing.

PS I’ll tell you something else about my Dad: he never would have voted for Donald Trump.

 

Categories
Just Shelley The Democratic Difference Weather

Debby didn’t do Savannah

Well, we lucked out. Debby was slow moving, which wasn’t good. But it degraded over land. Better yet, it grabbed and incorporated a dry air mass that kept most of the heavier overnight rain away.

We lost power, so I don’t have an accurate rain measurement from my system. However, according to the University of Georgia weather station across the street from me, we had a total of 8.01 inches in less than 24 hours.

Now, we’ll get about an inch of rain today, maybe an inch tomorrow, and it will be done.

So far the only damage is to our roof dryer vent, which seems to be weeping some water internally and sneaking out through a join. Not a big problem. And the power outage didn’t last long enough to spoil food in the fridge or freezer.

Other sections of the city weren’t as lucky, as there was quite a bit of flash flooding. Chatham county and Savannah really need to think about better storm water management, and how much unrestricted development they’re both allowing.

Anyway, last TS post for this storm.  Debby just said “Hey!” and is passing on through—its eye is directly overhead as I write this.

And Kamala Harris picked Tim Walz for VP! Let the politics begin!

Categories
People Political The Democratic Difference

Goodbye Joe, Hello Kamala

A whole lot changed since my last defense of President Biden. Last week he decided to step down from his re-election attempt and put all his support behind his VP, Kamala Harris.

Democrats came together behind Kamala Harris in enthusiastic numbers I haven’t seen in a long, long time. Within two days, she had enough delegation support to win the Democratic primary. I suspect by the time the convention rolls around, she’ll have everyone’s support.

I am sad that President Biden had to end his campaign, but ultimately, he sacrificed his ambitions for the country, and he did the right thing: he gave us a candidate we can ALL embrace.

And I want to go down on record as saying I want to be adopted by the Harris/Emhoff family.

Categories
The Democratic Difference

We Kick Out Trump and Greitens. Then What?

The St. Louis PD headline reads Missouri Republicans debate whether Greitens should stay or go. The debate is centered around revelations of the Greitens’ affair, and especially whether he photographed a bound, blindfolded woman and threatened blackmail.

Of course, discussions about kicking out a Republican in charge are not new this year. They happen all the time with President Trump. People breathlessly wait for the culmination of Mueller’s Russian investigation, hoping for a criminal indictment and impeachment.

Just stop for a moment, though, and think about what would happen if Greitens was forced to resign, and Trump kicked out of office?

In Missouri, the Lt. Governor would take over. This is Mike Parson. Many of us know Mike Parson from his effort to destroy Proposition B, the anti-puppy mill bill. He did so at the behest of Forrest Lucas, a wealthy Indiana oil man. Forrest Lucas is also the man behind Protect the Harvest, a frothing-at-the-mouth anti-animal welfare, anti-environmental effort. Lucas owns Mike Parson.

Not only would Parsons continue the destructive efforts begun by Greitens in the state, he’d likely increase such efforts because, unlike Greitens, Parson knows how to get along with the Republicans in the legislature. Right now, it is these same Republicans who have stymied some of Greitens more egregious actions.

Interestingly enough, the same circumstances hold true for Trump and the Vice-President, Mike Pence.

Mike Pence would support most of the cabinet members Trump has appointed. Heck, he probably recommended most of them. Pence would also continue undermining our civil rights, our environment, and our attempts at economic equality. But, unlike Trump, he’s seemingly level-headed, not overtly narcissistic, knows how to hide the bodies, and is a former Congressman. He’d get along with the Republicans in Congress—to the point where the GOP would stage such a slash-and-burn on the government and this country that it could be decades before we’d recover.

Most importantly, both Trump and Greitens are tarnishing the Republican brand. They are millstones tied around the neck of every Republican running for office.

So, giving up Eric Greitens for Mike Parson, and giving up Donald Trump for Mike Pence. Is this really what we want? Is it worth the momentary satisfaction of kicking a hated person out of office, only for them to be replaced by an even more destructive, harmful person?

Or is a better use of our time focused on preventing as much damage as we can, locally and at the national level, while we replace all of these jokers during elections in 2018 and 2020?