Categories
Photography Weblogging

Faux photoblog

Recovered from the Wayback Machine.

Six Apart has announced the preliminary release of TypePad, a hosted solution for those people partial to Movable Type. Prices look pretty decent, low enough to be competitive, but not so low that there’s thousands of weblogs on one server.

Among the features is HTML-free templating, moblogging, automated FOAF generation from the blogroll (hmmm – don’t agree with this one), as well as the ability to show what you’re reading and listening to. The best decision Six Apart made with TypePad was pointing the weblogger’s domain names at their weblogs. Depending on the web server used, this is a very doable thing, and I think other hosted solutions are going to have to look at this as an option.

One of the functionalities that TypePad has that Movable Type doesn’t is a ‘photoblog’, photography weblogging setup. I imagine this will interest quite a few folks who already have their own hosted MT sites. I liked the look and feel of many of the photoblogs I looked at, such as Joi Ito’s San Francisco photos, so I set out to re-create the look in a Movable Type weblog called MT Faux PhotoBlog. Once I figured out the templates, it was quite easy to create the album, and I may do this for other photo albums.

How does it work? The solution requires that the server have ImageMagick, and the ImageMagick Perl wrapper installed. Otherwise you’ll need to create your thumbnails yourself.

Categories are created for each photo, sans the photo extension. For instance, a photo such as tunnel.jpg would have a category called ‘tunnel’. When the photo is uploaded, it’s uploaded as a separate entry, and a thumbnail is created. When I create the thumbnails, I don’t constrain the image proportions, so that I can create square thumbnails. In the Faux PhotoBlog, I’m using thumbnails of 120 x 120px sizes.

To get the front page, I replaced the traditional MT entry listing with the following:

<div id=”content” style=”align: center”>
<div class=”blog” >

<MTEntries lastn=”20″>
<a href=”<$MTEntryPermalink$>”><img src=”<$MTBlogURL$>photos/<$MTEntryCategory$>-thumb.jpg” alt=”<$MTEntryTitle$>” class=”mainpage” /></a>
</MTEntries>

</div>
</div>

What this template code does is create the URL for the image by concatenating the category name, with the blog URL and photo thumbnail filename extension (jpg). Instead of category, you could also use entry title, but then this forces it into a title that might not be descriptive. Instead, I used entry title for the ALT tag for the image, and reserve category for the filename.

To force the images to line up and wrap without using an HTML table I created an img CSS class to use with the images that sets the image to inline display:

img.mainpage {
display: inline;
margin: 5px 5px 5px 5px }

I also gave the images 5px of space around them on each side. All the images are given a border, in this case a solid grey one.

(If your browser doesn’t support display:inline, you can also surround each photo with a SPAN tag, as this forces the image inline. However, if you do this, make sure your outer DIV block doesn’t have left padding or margin, or you’ll get uneven wrapping.)

This takes care of the main page. For each individual page, to get the lined up thumbnails, I used the following:

<div class=”side”>
<MTEntries lastn=”20″>
<a href=”<$MTEntryPermalink$>”><img src=”<$MTBlogURL$>photos/<$MTEntryCategory$>-thumb.jpg” alt=”<$MTEntryTitle$>” width=”50″ style=”margin-bottom: 10px” /></a><br />
</MTEntries>
</div>

I’m using the browser resize capability – resizing the thumbnails from 120 down to 50. However, that’s something you can change. It just seems to match the PhotoBlog look. Additionally, in this setup, I only list the most recent 20 photos, but you can change this, on the front page and in the sidebars.

That’s it. Then, to add a new photo, just upload a new photo, make sure you create and upload a square thumbnail the same name as your original photo with a ‘-thumb’ appended, and name the category for the photo the same name as the image file:

photo: tunnel.jpg
thumbnail: tunnel-thumb.jpg
category: tunnel

You’ll need to rebuild all entries each time you add a new photo, otherwise it won’t show in the sidebar. Chances are, you’ll want to consider keeping your photo albums smaller, less than 100 photos.

TypePad’s photo album feature probably has a lot more features, but for those of us on MT, at least we can capture the look.

(Access the individual and main index templates, and stylesheet. )

update 

Well, I left parts out, didn’t I? When you upload a photo, have MT create a new entry and use the embedded photo option. If you have the software installed, also have it create the thumbnail for you at the same time – making sure not to constrain the proportion, and make the thumbnail square.

In the entry, delete everything but the URL for the photo, converting it into an img instead of a hypertext link if you used a thumbnail when creating the entry.

Alternatively you can just create a fresh entry, and add the image yourself – but you’ll then have to provide a thumbnail. If you do, remember to name the thumbnail imagename-thumb. Don’t try and constrain the photo itself as a thumbnail using width and height in the img tag, unless the photo is square to begin with – browsers don’t do a great job of converting a big rectangular photo into an itty bitty square thumbnail.

To make the photos display properly, you’ll also want to change the chronological order to forward chronology, not the typical reverse chronological order of most weblogs.

Thanks to Al for correction to my earlier statement: MT will create thumbnails if you have either ImageMagick or NetPBM installed. Ask your ISP if you’re not sure.

And if you have problems, holler.

Categories
Weblogging

Blogging Holiday

Recovered from the Wayback Machine.

Phil Wolff’s bringing up David Weinberger’s old idea of a Blogging holiday – everyone take a week off in August. This is in response to some webloggers expressing what sounds like burn out.

This reminds me of when I worked for the tie factory in Seattle, spending all day long with big industrial irons pressing tie after tie, inhaling the fumes from the chemicals used in the material, trying to keep on my feet when the temperatures hovered near 100. Every summer during the hottest part of the year, the management would close the place down or otherwise people would start fainting from the heat. Everyone would have to take their vacations at the same time, and If I remember correctly, it was the first two weeks of August.

We’ve all gone beyond the time when we have to be here all the time, or have to provide excuses either to take a holiday, or return from a holiday. I would hope that each of us takes whatever time we need individually, without some kind of ‘group’ action, the thought of which is starting to get a bit scary at times.

(Okay at the count of three, let’s all reach up and scratch our noses. You know you want to, you know your nose itches. You can feel it, and your hand wants to reach up. Come on. Give in. Ready? One, two, three SCRATCH!)

But Phil is right, in that we do need time off here and again – even if for no other reason to wake our readers up and make them aware that we’re here as a gift, not as an obligation. He’s also right in that we’re going to burn out if we’re here day in and day out; we’re going to lose our sense of perspective, and our uniqueness and individuality. If we become too heavily immersed in this society, we’ll become too easily influenced by the buzz, the ‘leaders’, the comments, whatever. Time off can help us decide what we want this space to be when it’s spiraled out of our control.

Time off can also help us re-discover our personal lives when they’ve spiraled out of control.

You know, last week I found out a link to my weblog was removed from a blogroll of a person I called a friend, and it was a shock. Especially when I asked them why and they said it was because they never knew when I was going to erupt here – that my photos, pretty as they are, aren’t enough to cover the ugliness of these eruptions, and by this I assumed they meant tempermental explosions.

(I taked with AKMA about this – he did mention something about my ‘tempestuous nature’. I adore him and Margaret, I want them to adopt me.)

Reading the email was like getting hit by a wall. I wasn’t sure whether I even wanted to stay weblogging because I wasn’t sure what the point was any more. It seems as if I’m not writing about what I want to, my photos seem flat, my temper uncertain, and too much of my personal life is leaking through to this page – enough to make me reactive at times, but not enough for readers to understand why. So I took a long weekend, and stayed away from weblogging for the most part.

Did it help? A bit. The words still hurt, but I have a better sense of perspective about them. Reminded myself – again – that I’m supposedly here because I enjoy it, and should focus on what I want to write and not worry about the responses. Most of all I was reminded to stop reacting to people who know how to push my buttons, and who enjoy doing so.

I’m not going to take a group sanctioned blogging holiday, all respect to the good Dr. Weinberger. But I am going to walk away from the weblog when I find myself pushed into a corner, tired, or otherwise dull as dishwater. Or when I find that I’m allowing myself to be too influenced by the people around me.

Hmmm. In fact, I think I feel another long weekend coming up – I’m a bit miffed because weblogging has done absolutely nothing for my sex life – what a gyp.

Categories
Weblogging

Sweet tunes and Weblogging runes

Being off-weblog this weekend, I missed the Blogathon, and in particular, the joint effort on the part of Scott Andrew LePera and Shannon Campbell to co-write a song in 24 hours. All online.

They made their goal, plus one: two songsSouthdown and Nothing New. (Mirrored on Burningbird Net)

Their effort was extraordinary. The music is wonderous. How they did this is amazing. I hope that Scott and Shannon combine their talent more often, because they make lovely music together. Though this note is late for the Blogathon, hopefully you can still contribute to Mr. Holland’s Opus in their name.

In additional news, Elaine aka Kalilily was featured in a new Chicago Tribute article on women and weblogging.

(Note, registration required for article.)

All in all, the article was one of the better ones, with a few caveats. I winced when I read Rebecca Blood’s comment categorizing weblogs into “filter-style blogs or short-form journals”, as well as the article’s references towards gender-based weblogging:

Men tend to use the filter format for their often political Weblogs, whereas women lean toward journals about “day-to-day stuff,” or traditionally female topics such as cooking, knitting or motherhood, Blood said.

Ouch – gender stereotypes are alive and well and living in blogdom. For being such an open minded person, Rebecca can be suprisingly conservative in weblogging classification, ethics, and normative behavior. I like the point that she made on clustering, though:

However, blogging can have a downside Blood calls a “clustering effect,” where people only link to like-minded sites, creating “an echo chamber.”

“That’s not a good thing,” she said. “We need to talk to each other and understand each other in a democracy.”

Spot on.

I also liked what Elaine had to say:

“From politics to partying, from men to menopause, from feminism to family–women Webloggers seem more comfortable in viewing their personal lives in a larger, cultural context and also in looking at global issues from a very personal point of view,” she wrote in an e-mail.

In fact, there was much about this article that was refreshing, not the least of which was hearing from more ‘just plain blogging folks’. Who just happen to be women.

Categories
Weblogging

Want to be Wayward?

We’re looking at opening the doors for the Wayward Weblogger co-op here in the next few weeks. Still having to work issues through, and still helping some of the original group make their move. The issue of permalinks and using different weblogging tools becomes more obvious all the time.

I also posted my first rough draft of the look and feel for the forpoets.org at the co-op weblog. Thanks to Ben from my comments, I’m getting help with Blosxom, so there’s hope for me yet.

So much technology to play with, so much to write, so little time…

Categories
Weblogging

Centralization? No

Since the talk this week is going to be on weblogging portability – you can see it in the air, you can smell it in the wind, this is the topic this week – might as well continue the discussion I started in the last posting. In fact, I should move my Weblogging for Poets permalink essay up and write it here rather than wait until I get the forpoets.org weblogs going.

For now though, John Robb comes up with the following in regards to weblogging portability:

I would start with single repository of weblogs where the owner of the weblog can change the location of their weblog and other descriptive data by signing into an account. This service would need to be tightly controlled and trusted. If you don’t own the domain, your hosting company or hosting sponsor would need to support the account creation.

John then sees this repository being used by the weblogging tools as a way of checking to see who is moved. A centralized repository of weblog domains? Not a chance.

As stated in the last posting, you should use your own domain name for your weblog, you really should. With this you can move from host to host and literally take your weblog with you. However, if you find yourself someday kicked out of your hosting service, say at blogspot.com or typepad.com or any number of other hosted services, then the best way to advertise that you’re moved is just how John’s doing it – use the weblogs and pass the information via word of mouth…urh…blog.

Using a centralized DNS wannabe morphed weblog finder to solve the problems of moving away from a centralized host, is not the answer to this particular problem.