Categories
Writing

Doc and Dave sitting in a tree…

Recovered from the Wayback Machine.

Doc sent an email out to a bunch of folks this morning, pointing to a new work he and David Weinberger created, World of Ends.

Doc asked for comments. I sent them in an email, but then it dawned on me that Doc might actually prefer a link. I am a slow woman on Fridays. So here’s the link, and my comment:

While I may appreciate the eloquent writing, the strong beliefs, the reasoned arguments, as well as the hope as dewy as the grass beneath a young maiden’s feet as she trips about gathering in the cows to milk (are ‘cow’ and ‘milk’ bad words now?), I have to tell you my first reaction on skimming through this was:

Oh good lord what is this? A variation of “I’m okay, and you’re Net”?

However, I have been accused, a time or two, of being contrary. Not going with the flow. Breaking the circle. I will endeavor to read this again after I have a nice long walk, in the hopes of adjusting a deplorable tendency to say “but what does it mean?”. I will then be of a mind to bask in being an end-point, and to learn to believe in the power of the bits. (Well, before we blow ourselves to even smaller bits in war, that is.)

Thanks for the link, Doc.

Shelley

I will, of course, be treated the same as the fly that buzzes around the potato salad at a picnic: as just one of the nuisances to be endured when one has open food in a open eating area. Ignore, and continue the feast.

update 

The World of Ends has been slashdotted, which should be sending lots of buzz winging its way.

You really have to check out the comment thread titled “World Ends”. Funny insight into the Slash Dot phenomena.

Categories
Just Shelley

Birds squabble that’s what they do

The little girl ran into the small room that served as her mother’s home office. Her mother was typing away at the computer, intent on the screen, but that didn’t stop the girl from running up and grabbing hold of her mother’s hand.

“Mama! Mama! Come quick! Something’s wrong with the birds!” the girl cried out, tugging at her mother’s hand, trying to pull her towards the door.

The woman resisted at first, as she had work that needed doing. “Honey, there’s nothing wrong with the birds. The birds are fine.” But the little girl wouldn’t listen and kept tugging at her mother’s hand, calling out the same thing again and again, about “something wrong with the birds.”

The woman, by now bit alarmed by her daughter’s croes, allowed herself to be pulled to her feet, down the hallway, and to the front door.

“Look, Mama! Look at the birds!”

Looking out, the woman noticed that something must have pulled a bag of moldy bread from a garbage can somewhere and left most of the bread in the middle of the road in front of their house. Birds from all over had flocked to this unexpected feast, each trying to get its share.

There were tiny house finches, and morning doves, and an occasional flash of blue from the jays. There were also some chickadees and sparrows in the mix, and some pigeons of course, and in the midst of the flock that aggressor of the scavenger, a couple of seagulls had made their way to the feast.

All the birds were squabbling at each other in a deafening cacophony of sound. No wonder the little girl was alarmed—hearing this raucous noise and seeing the birds fighting among themselves. Rather than be concerned, though, the woman chuckled at the picture: at the seagulls threatening the smaller birds with their large, dangerous beaks but while their backs were turned the finches sneacked in and grabbed pieces, some half again as large as the tiny birds. The smaller birds’ greed was swiftly punished because much of what they stole was stolen in turn by the chickadees and the jays once the bread was safely away from the gulls. In the midst of all this, the morning doves and sparrows quietly pecked away at the crumbs scattered about from all the tugging and jostling.

The woman put her hand on her daughter’s head, and said, “Baby, there’s nothing wrong with the birds. They’re just fighting over some bread in the street.”

At that moment, one of the gulls pecked at a small finch, which managed to duck away from the bigger bird. The little girl pulled back a bit, imagining what would happen if the smaller bird had been hit.

“Mama, are you sure this is normal? What if that bigger bird hurt the little one?”

“Yes, I’m sure. If you’ll look real close, you’ll see that none of the birds are hurting any of the other birds. It’s just a lot of sound and fury is all. Birds do this when they flock around a bit of food.”

“They do?”

“Sure, it’s normal.”

“Shouldn’t we go out and stop them, though? Before someone gets hurt? If they’re fighting over food, I can give them my toast. If I told them I had some toast to share, would they stop squabbling?”

The woman was touched by her daughter’s offer. Kneeling down, she looked into her daughter’s face, into her trusting, young eyes. The woman was filled with a sudden fierce protectiveness. She hoped her daughter would never loose the ability to feel concerned for others when she grew up—even squabbling birds. To never lose the wonder of everyday events. Speaking softly she said, “Honey, if you threw out your toast, the birds would just squabble over it, too. Since you and I can’t speak bird, we have no way of telling them there’s plenty of food for them all.”

She brushed a strand of hair out of her daughter’s face, the same strand that persisted in escaping from the band holding her hair back. “No best to just let the birds be. They’ll eat the bread and once it’s gone, they’ll go their separate ways, no harm done to any of them.”

“Birds squabble, that’s all. That’s what they do.”

Categories
Connecting

Imagine this is a door

Recovered from the Wayback Machine.

Imagine that this is a door for a moment. Do you have the picture in your mind? Your door might be all wood, or it might be a painted door – blue or green.

Perhaps its a metal door. With bars. If so, get help.

Now that you have this picture in your mind, I want you to visualize a sign on it, white paper, big black letters. The sign says:

Please do not disturb.

Categories
RDF Writing

Book review finished

Recovered from the Wayback Machine.

The public book review period is over.

I wanted to thank all the people who were kind enough to provide comments and feedback about the book. I received more feedback than originally anticipated, overwhelmingly so at times. This does demonstrate the interest in the community.

This wasn’t an easy book to write, not the least of which is re-writing some sections more than once due to changes in the RDF specifications and technologies – moving targets at the best of times.

I hope that the book reflects the different views of RDF within the community, and is comprehensive, as well as living up to its title, “Practical RDF”. We will see.

Thank you again.

Categories
Connecting

Trust: Burden or gift

Recovered from the Wayback Machine.

Any movie that features betrayal as part of the plot usually features a scene where the injured party cries out I trusted you! In one form or another, it is the ultimate denouncement, the worst condemnation of another. Yet, how many times have we asked for trust, and how many times has it been thrust at us? We look at trust as a gift freely given, but I wonder if it isn’t more a burden than a gift.

When we have a child, even when we obtain a pet, we’ve accepted trust willingly because neither the baby nor the kitten or puppy, bird or fish, had any say, yay or nay, in entering the relationship with us. When I hear of a parent neglecting or harming a child, or when I hear of a person torturing or starving a dog, my blood boils because I can think of no greater crime than to betray the trust of the innocent. The child did not ask to be born. The puppy did not ask to come home.

When we are born, we enter into a relationship of trust with the world around us. We are taught that we have an obligation not to harm others, not to waste, not to destroy. But we betray that trust day by day, sometimes minute by minute, because we are consumers of raw material; we are producers of waste. But the mitigation of this betrayal of trust is based both on degree and intent. Destroying a tree to make paper is understood; destroying a city to kill one man, less so.

Such forms of trust are interwoven into our existence, an acknowledgement that life carries with it a disclaimer reading, in part …by continuing to breath, you accept that you have a responsibility to those around you; a responsibility not to be discarded without serious reprecussions….

Some forms of trust come with the roles we take on. We place a great deal of trust in those who enforce our laws; we trust them to do their jobs and, in exchange, we give them extraordinary power over us. Their betrayal, then, is when they stop trusting us.

There are forms of trust based on specific acts of mutual agreement. When we marry we enter into an agreement based on trust as much as love. When we take a job, we enter into an association based on trust – we trust the employer to pay us and to provide a safe environment, they trust us to work hard and be honest. The teacher and student accept the bonds of trust – the teacher to do their job effectively, the student to respect the teacher. In these acts, we enter into a relationship that depends on the other from the first moment, a contract of trust if you will.

Friendship is where the exchange of trust is at its most complex. At some point in a friendship, there may be an exchange of trust. Or there may not be. Two people can call themselves friends and be friends for life, but never trust each other. Another two may meet and in five minutes exchange trust and with it the intimacies that go with trust.

Kierkegaard’s Leap of Faith was based on religious belief, but for me the truest leap of faith is when we give our trust to another person and call them ‘friend’.