Categories
Weblogging

Categorization and identity

Recovered from the Wayback Machine.

I tried an experiment yesterday: I organized my blogroll into different categories of webloggers, such as Really Scary Smart People, Huggables, Life Twisters, and so on.

The intention was to have a bit of fun, and also to hopefully encourage weblog readers into visiting these weblogs. One of the problems with blogrolls is that they’re so uniform and so common we tend to ignore them. By categorizing my blogroll friends, I had hoped to make them all stand out a bit.

What I forgot with this little brain storm of mine is that categorizing a person is probably one of the most depersonalizing things you can do to another human being. My putting an individual in a category said to that person, this is how I view you. I told them, “Forget the richness of your voice, the strength of your personality, the warmth of your humor, and my regard, and yes even love for you. You are (pick one: a/b/c/…).”

I took each of my friends and flattened them into a cookie-cutter category, and then walked away dusting hands off, pleased at my own cleverness. There are times when the Bird screws the pooch, and this was surely one of those times.

AKMA’s been talking about identity lately. In particular, he wrote the following:

One of the complicating elements in our discussion of identity comes from our tendency to take the partial information we have about someone’s identity as sufficient to envision his or her full identity.

 

Yesterday, I took one characteristic of each person and used this to form a basis for insertion into one category or another. By doing so I said to my weblog readers, “this weblogger is a Woman who Kicks Butt”. I set the stage for that reader so that when they go to Shannon’s weblog, they expect to see primarily a Woman who Kicks Butt. However, they may be shocked to see that the Woman who Kicks Butt is also a sensitive, accomplished and talented singer and songwriter, loyal friend, and highly complex and rich personality.

AKMA isn’t “just” a Huggable, Really Scary Smart person – he’s the one person who has broken through my deep distrust of Christians by showing that a Christian can have a sense of humor, can be tolerant, can love others regardless of their religious affiliation, and can have a deep moral integrity and loyalty that transcends any particular religious belief.

Chris isn’t just a Life Twister or Unique or Huggable – though all three are part of him. He’s an extremely caring person who believes strongly that we, as a people, can be better than how we see ourselves. When I think of him, I think of this person who wants to grab the world in a big bear hug, and then slap the world upside the head for all the idiotic things we do.

Sharon transcends Butt Kicker and Smart person and Artist, because she’s a mother and student and a very good friend who is going to be the world’s best librarian someday. Why? Because she has a deep love for books that goes beyond their material worth – to her words are gold, expressed thoughts diamonds.

I placed Jonathon into that old Australian Delegation classification, which removed any vestige of his personality, reducing him to nothing more than a citizen of a country. I disregarded the fact that when Jonathon writes about The Pillow Book or Tales of Genji, I want to curl up on the floor putting my head on my hands and just listen to the beauty of the words as they flow over and around me.

Dorothea is more than a Really Scary Smart Person or Woman who Kicks Butt. She wrote in the comments attached to the category posting:

There’s an interesting blog lurking in the experience, though, one AKMA might want to take a stab at. However much we try, we have limited control over how we are perceived by others. Our identities, if you will, are as dependent on the interpretation of others as is our writing on our readers.

 

Perhaps it is not surprising, then, that BB’s genial attempt to lend us personality led to difficulties. How many of us are entirely comfortable with the idea that our identities are not under our sole control?

Dorothea is an astute observer of humanity, with an incredible knack for cutting to the heart of the matter. She is, by far, richer than any one entry in any one category.

I am a neophyte in this new brave new world where we connect to others through the threaded void, but I am learning. I am learning.

Categories
Photography

A thousand words

Recovered from the Wayback Machine.

California coastal path and the sea

Categories
Technology

P2P Discovery

What kind of core do Kazaa and its supernodes have? Is it iron? Gold? Or is it more of an aluminum core because the cloud that supports the Kazaa P2P network is still malleable — the Supernodes that provide the cloud services are fluid and can change as well as go offline with little or no impact to the system.

I imagine, without going into the architecture of the system, that more than one Supernode is assigned to any particular subnet, others to act as backups, most likely pinging the primary Supernode to see if it’s still in operation. Out of operation, the backup Supernode(s) takes over and a signal is sent to the P2P nodes to get services from this IP address rather than that one. The original Supernode machine may even detect a shutdown and send a signal to the secondaries to take over.

Or perhaps the Supernode IPs are chained and the software on each P2P node checks at this IP first and if no response occurs, automatically goes to the second within the Supernode list and continues on until an active Supernode is found. This would take very little time, and would, for the most part, be transparent to the users.

Again without access to any of the code, and even any architecture documentation (which means there’s some guesswork here) the algorithm behind the Supernode selection list looks for nodes that have the bandwidth, persistent connectivity, and CPU to act as Supernodes with little impact to the computer’s original use. The member nodes of each KaZaA sub-net — call it a circle — would perform searches against the circle’s Supernode, which is, in turn, connected to a group of Supernodes from other circles so that if the information sought in the first circle can’t be found, it will most likely be found in the next Supernode and so on. This is highly scalable.

So far so good — little or no iron in the core, because no one entity, including KaZaA or the owner’s behind KaZaA, can control the existence and termination of the Supernodes. Even though KaZaA is yet another file sharing service rather than a services brokering system, the mechanics would seem to meet our definition of a P2P network. Right?

Wrong.

What happens when a new node wants to enter the KaZaA network? What happens if KaZaA — the corporate body — is forced offline, as it was January 31st because of legal issues? How long will the KaZaA P2P network survive?

In my estimation, a P2P network with no entry point will cease to be a viable entity within 1-2 weeks unless the P2P node owners make a determined effort to keep the network running by designating something to be an entry point. Something with a known IP address. Connectivity to the P2P circle is the primary responsibility of a P2P cloud. KaZaA’s connectivity is based on a hard-coded IP. However, small it is, this is still a kernel of iron.

We need a way for our machines to find not just one but many P2P circles of interest using approaches that have worked effectively for other software services in the past:

We need a way to have these P2P circles learn about each other whenever they accidentally bump up against each other — just as webloggers find each other when their weblogging circles bump up against each other because a member of two circles points out a weblog of interest from one circle to the other.

We need these circle to perform an indelible handshake and exchange of signatures that become part of the makeup of each circle touched so that one entire P2P circle can disappear, but still be recreated because it’s “genetic” makeup is stored in one, two, many other circles. All it would take to restart the original circle is two nodes expressing an interest.

We need a way to propagate the participation information or software or both to support the circles that can persist regardless of whether the original source of said software or information is still operating, just as software viruses have been propagated for years. Ask yourselves this — has the fact that the originator of a virus gone offline impacted on the spread of the said virus? We’ve been harmed by the technology for years, time to use the concepts for good.

We need a way to discover new services using intelligent searches that are communicated to our applications using a standard syntax and meta-language, through the means of a standard communication protocol, collected with intelligent agents, as Google and other search engines have been using for years. What needs to change is to have the agents find the first participating circle on the internet and ask for directions to points of interest from there.

A standard communication protocol, meta-language, syntax. Viral methods of software and information propagation. Circles of interest with their own DNA that can be communicated with other circles when they bump in the night, so to speak. Internet traversing agents that only have to be made slightly smarter — given the ability to ask for directions.

Web of discovery. Doesn’t the thought of all this excite you?

Categories
Connecting

Glad you’re OK

Fellow weblogger and Plutonian Sheila Lennon talks briefly about the shooting at her newspaper Saturday:

It can’t happen to us, here in this quiet place. But it has.

Sheila, I’m relieved you weren’t in the line of fire. My deepest sympathies to the families of those who died

Categories
Weblogging

Out and about but still not in St. Lou

It’s amazing how much one can accomplish if one stops weblogging for a week.

I finally finished my writing for Unix Power Tools and am now in the editing and production stages. In addition, I’ve been working quietly in the background implementing some changes to the weblog. Note that those you see now aren’t the really interesting changes – I’ll be hitting some of you up to help me beta test these the first week of July.

I’ve started the usual pre-move activities: cancelling utilities, deciding what to keep, store, throw away. My philosophy is if I haven’t read it, worn it, or used it in two years, out it goes. That ought to take care of a lot of packing.

I don’t actually move until the 20th, and will be taking a roundabout two-week drive to get to St. Louis. If I can avoid getting et by grizzlies, I’ll post my adventures when I arrive. If I can’t avoid getting et by grizzlies, at least you’ll know I gave a bear somewhere a full meal deal.

‘Scuse me, do you want fries with that human?

I’ll be pulling my DSL connection this week, as soon as I receive some files related to a new contract I’m working on; most likely Tuesday if all goes as planned. That will end my posting – finally – as well as my unseemly, shady weblog lurking and quick hit and run commenting.

I wasn’t going to post until I got to St. Louis, but found that going cold turkey and not posting for an entire month was too much for me. Since I’m an addictive  personality, going without my weblogging fix that long was causing physical discomfort and aberrant behavior. For instance, joining friends for a going away dinner yesterday, I found myself nattering away about weblogging, completely disregarding glazed eyes and pitying looks.

Luckily, a group of students having dinner before going to the prom showed up – girls dressed in incredibly slinky, sophisticated cut down to here, up to there dresses – providing a useful distraction while I pulled myself together long enough to remember to hide my obsession from weblogging unbelievers.

There have been some interesting threads I’ve wanted to post on, in particular the Unified RSS thread at Ben Hammersley’s weblog, as well ongoing discussions about weblogger as warblogger as Journalist as savior of the world and defender of free press.

However, I’m following a new weblogging policy of “think first, write later” rather than indulging in my usual direct synaptic connection of brain to weblog to you. Because of this I’m holding on pursuing either thread in any depth until I reach St. Louis and can give both threads the time and attention they deserve.

I do want to say, though, that I’m pleased with Edd Dumbill’s comments in the RSS thread. As a fan of RDF as well as author of an upcoming RDF book, I’m concerned when I see folks ‘simplifying’ a specification in order to make it work with one particular implementation. As we found with HTML, this isn’t always the best course to follow.

The technology I will be adding to this weblog the first week of July is also based on RDF – something that couldn’t occur without the rich meta-language capability RDF provides, and the availability of libraries to work with same.

Personally, I think this technology is also going to blow the socks off of RSS/aggregation – but that’s only my opinion, of course.

As for the topic of weblogger as warblogger as Journalist as savior of the world and defender of free press – it can wait.