September 20th, 2007

The big story in these parts today is the protest rallies in support of the group of black youths known as the "Jena 6". Jena is a small town in Louisiana, and the focus of about 10,000 protesters from all over the country, today.

It's difficult to find the facts to the story of the Jena 6, because there's no person in the world better at burying unpleasantness than a Southerner.

Ostensibly, two events happened that no one disputes:

The first event is that during a high school assembly a black student asked the principal if the black kids could sit underneath the 'white tree'– a big old shade tree that had previously been occupied by white students. The very next day, three white kids hung three (and I've heard two) nooses from the same tree in the town square

A noose is a known symbol in the South for lynching. More specifically, whites lynching blacks. The principal expelled the students, but the school superintendent overrode the Principal and gave the white kids in-school 3 day suspensions. It jez a prank, everyone says.

The second event takes place three months later. Six black kids are identified as having beaten up a white kid in the school hallway. The white kid ends up in the hospital, is treated, and released two hours later. The six black kids are charged with attempted second degree murder.

Right off that bat, you probably noticed, as I did, that it's hard to think of a school fight as an attempt or a conspiracy to commit murder. At the same time, fair play suggests that it's wrong of of a group of students to gang up on another. This isn't Rosa Parks we're talking about here, the lines are not cut and dried.

But then the story gets even more interesting. I want to point out two writings on this event.

The first is by Mel Didier a teacher in a nearby Lafayette Parish high school. Mr. Didier wrote that there were more than just these two incidents, and in fact there's a pattern of racist violence in this small town:

A black student was beaten at a social function, and no one was charged. The DA goes into a hastily-called assembly and, looking directly at the African-American students, warns them that he can end their life with the stroke of his pen.

A white graduate pulls a gun on three black students who take the gun away and no charges are brought against the white grad, but the students were charged with theft when they didn't give the gun back.

A white student taunts a black student beaten at a party and is jumped and beaten by six African-American students. Fox News points out that Justin Barker went to the hospital and was released the same day, attending a ring ceremony and social function that same day.

The DA charges those guilty of the attack with aggravated assault, and, when certain teachers and locals object, he ups the charges to attempted second-degree murder.

It's difficult to deny a pattern of racial tension in this predominantly white community. What's absolutely fascinating, though, is to read the front page of the Jena Times today, with a so-called timeline of events.

I'd copy text excerpts, but the paper actually made the story into a JPEG image and then inserted this into a frame. So I did the next best thing and copied pieces of the JPEG, highlighted phrases, and am copying the result here. I encourage you, though, to read the original. If it gets pulled, let me know and I'll post a copy.

Part of the Jena Times newspaper article

I can't be the only one who finds it odd that the author kept downplaying any racial tension in the community, while listing event after event that is inspired by racial tension. In addition, the author also stressed the 'playfulness' of the request about sitting under the white tree, when from other accounts, this wasn't a playful request. In addition, it's pretty obvious that when white kids are mentioned, they're mentioned in a positive or neutral manner, but the actions of the black kids are portrayed negatively.

In fact reading this timeline, I feel like I've been transported back in time to the late 50's and early 60's, when white kids beating up blacks was considered nothing more than 'juvenile spirits'. What's amazing is that the town newspaper thought to publish this to downplay the racial problems the town has, when all it did for me was convince me that they exist.

According to an MTV story at one assembly where white students and black sat separate from each other, the DA held up a pen and said, specifically to the blacks, with one stroke of my pen, I can make your life disappear. Of course one person who lives near the area said the DA is more of a megalomaniac than a racist, but the end result is the same: justice is not prevailing.

I'm not fond of Al Sharpton who is leading much of the protest, and not condoning what the kids did: no matter how angry, six against one is wrong (if there were six, that hasn't necessarily been proved). But this isn't a case where these black kids decided to jump this white kid for nothing. Even the town's most fervent supports acknowledge the white kid taunted the black kids. This was a hall fight triggered by anger that got out of control, and should have been prosecuted this way.

Attempted second degree murder?

Other weblogs covering this story.

The weblog that seems to be following this event the closest is Pursuing Holiness, including a detailed weblog post on the events the day of the fight.

update

From the Chicago Tribune today:

The judge overseeing the racially-charged case of the Jena 6 declined Friday to release the only one of the six black teenagers still being held in jail, despite the fact that the youth's conviction for aggravated second-degree battery was vacated a week ago by an appeals court, family members and court sources confirmed.

Bell has been jailed since the beating incident last December, unable to post $90,000 bond. That bond was rendered moot when Bell's battery conviction was overturned by Louisiana's Third Circuit Court of Appeals on Sept. 14, which ruled that Bell, who was 16 at the time of the incident, should have been tried as a juvenile. The local district attorney prosecuting the case, Reed Walters, has vowed to appeal that ruling, and to press ahead with his cases against the other five youths, who are free on bond.

But Bell remains in jail, and under the jurisdiction of juvenile court, because he is now being prosecuted as a juvenile on a count of conspiracy in connection with the beating. Mauffray's ruling Friday means he declined to set any conditions for Bell's release.

That will show us uppity outsiders how they do justice in Louisiana, yessir indeed.

Comments
1
bill - 4:23 pm 9/20/2007

This is so sad. The black community loses all legitimacy when they are incapable of ever admitting that a member of their own race is EVER wrong. Let me get this straight… 6 guys beat the hell out of one guy and put him in the hospital (see picture: http://news.yahoo.com/photos/ss/events/u… ) and we have thousands of people marching in their support? Is this for real? Are whole communities actually condoning gang beatings? How pitiful. The responsible position for the black community to hold here would be that the Jena 6 were wrong and they should have to pay for their hate crime (which is exactly what it was). Now if the black community thinks there were crimes that were committed by whites that weren't prosecuted, they could legitimately gripe about that and direct their protests in that direction. However, the answer here isn't to make martyrs out of 6 thugs who gang beat the crap out of one young man.

2

I'm so torn on this one… I feel like there's no real "side" to take.

(1) Noose on a tree… sorry, in the deep south especially, that ain't a prank. Maybe permanent expulsion is too extreme, maybe a federal hate-crime prosecution is over the top… but *something* significant should have been done at the time. Wrist-slapping wasn't appropriate.

(2) I find some of the online responses to this stuff awfully… convenient. If this had been a girl mauled by a group of guys, any attempt at bringing up the victim's provocative clothing would be attacked vigorously by the same folks who keep talking about *this* victim's provocative words. Ditto for the constant pooh-poohing of his injuries.

(3) Attempted murder? Really? I know this country has gotten ridiculously soft, but when did an old-fashioned (albeit chickenshit) ass-kicking become the criminal equivalent of accidentally winging your ex-wife's new boyfriend with a .22 from behind the hedge? Racist or not, the charges seem incredibly overwrought.

3
Shelley - 4:44 pm 9/20/2007

Bill, this is so sad? I'm assuming you were trying to link to a photo of Justin Baker, the white kid who was beaten. here's one

Let's not forget the incidents leading up to it, including one of the people supposedly accused being beaten by a white guy the night before and Justin Baker taunting that kid about it in the school hallway. An excuse for reacting physically? No. Attempted murder. Give me a bloody break.

Roger, you and I both know exactly what that hanging noose meant, and the punishment those kids got was a slap in the wrist. And a very poor message to send for what sounds like a community that had been having problems before these events.

I hadn't heard about the clothing on the white kid. I do know that he did taunt the black kids — both 'sides' on this issue agree to that. Still, not a way to respond.

Once responded, though: attempted murder? Twenty years in prison for a school fight? After that slap on the wrist for the noose incident? Sorry, if it isn't racist, it certainly isn't justice.

But you and I know what these po'dunk towns in the south can be like. As one person said, I'm not protesting today because I want to, and I'm not celebrating the re-birth of the civil rights movement. I'd rather there not be a reason to be here.

4

I can't imagine how demeaning it must have been for a black in this population to see a noose and no one doing anything about it. A noose is no joke… ever. It would be like me putting a knife against your neck and saying, "hey, just kidding!". Being white, I can't ever imagine how it must have felt, reversing 40 years of what little progress has been made.

If this white kid was one of the kids who put these nooses up, he recklessly put his own life in danger. I'm not sure I would have been able to walk away from kicking someone's butt who did that. Perhaps the only thing better would have been for some white kids to kick those racist's butts.

5

Shelley,

Thanks for clearly connecting all the dots on this…T

They do have an actual definition of attempted murder in Louisiana, La R.S. 14:27, and "attempt" seems to be based pretty clearly on "intent", as in they meant to murder him which hardly seems to be the case.

On the other hand, a noose on a tree hardly seems to be a school yard prank but seems to more closely fit the definition of hate crime http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius_04/offenses_reported/hate_crime/index.html.

Although as usual the letter of the law seem pretty clear to me, the enforcement of it "just depends."

Marianne

6

[…] probably seeing the news of the 30,000+ blacks that are protesting in Jena, Louisiana over the arrest of 6 young black men who beat up a white kid. The white kid, witnesses say, was taunting them […]

7
Chris Byrne - 3:39 am 9/21/2007

Why do people think these 6 black kids had a reason to beat on one kid, nearly to death?

What the whites kids done was disgusting, and they are just racist scum, but the black kids have faired no better in my opinion, they should all be imprisoned for the crimes they have commited, all white and black kids involved

8
THeDRiFTeR - 3:43 am 9/21/2007

Wow, the lovefest is still on in them there United States. Attempted murder indeed. Will these charges stick? I mean, can they, really? And do they really face 20 years in prison?

If so, they should have killed the idiot, and that's basically the message being sent to the black community of Jena, IMHO.

9
Benjamin Westafer - 8:27 am 9/21/2007

I'll forgive your statement about Southerners. We all know that injustice and racism are only glossed over in the South. I spoke to a class of students about the incident and they rank it as the way these kids were raised. Apparently, Jena exists in a horrible time-warp. I think the quote was 'hillbilly's and thugs'. I brought up that I saw one of the protesters wearing a t-shirt that read, "No justice. No peace." I added a k and a w to 'No'. The thought I wanted to communicate to the kids is that violence tends to lead to further violence. I reminded them of Malcolm X's murder. I agree that the charges are way way way over the top.
Maybe the white kids could be required to do this tour, http://asiogi.org/workshops.html. I understand there's a place in Virginia, I think, where groups reenact a slave's life and escape. Hopefully something unifying will come out of all of this.

10
MAURICE - 9:25 am 9/21/2007

ANYTIME THAT SIX PEOPLE BEAT ONE PERSON IT IS UNDOUBTEDLY WRONG… HOWEVER, THE ATTEMPTED MURDER CHARGE FOR A BLACK EYE, IS EXCESSIVELY HARSH… ALSO THE FACT THAT WHEN THERE IN SCHOOL OR AT HOME THEY ARE KIDS, BUT AS SOON AS THE KIDS FIGHT THEY ARE MEN WHO ARE THREATS TO HARMONY TO THE HARMONY OF LIFE BOTHERS ME… IF YOUR GOING TO CHARGE THESE 6 BOYS AS ADULTS FOR FIGHTING, THEN THE LAW IN ANY ATTEMPT TO BE FAIR MUST CLEARLY DEFINE WHEN IN ALL CASES DO BOYS BECOME MEN… IF THIS IS THE PRECEDENT, EVERY SCHOOL YARD FIGHT FROM NOW ON MEANS THAT YOUR KIDS SHOULD GET LOCKED UP, BECAUSE WE ALL KNOW THAT KIDS FIGHT…LITTLE TOMMY IN THE 4TH GRADE BETTER STAY IN LINE OR HE CAN FACE JAIL TIME…

11
Ashley - 9:50 am 9/21/2007

In no way, shape or form could it have EVER been justified to charge these kids with murder. This was simply a "school hallway" fight that ecsaladed becasue of previous racial tension. It probably hurt the black kids more to see nooses hung from a tree for them simply asking to sit under it, than it hurt the white kid after getting his ass kicked. How the HELL can this action ever be seen as a "prank"? This was obviously racially motivated and those white kids deserved the expulsion that they were first given. How long are we as a nation going to overlook and deny the injustices of racism that exist in our country. If we dont do something soon, something catastrophic will happen.

12
Nikki - 10:40 am 9/21/2007

The protest was against the penalty that was placed upon the black kids, not the upholding of what they did. The white kids only got a slap on the wrist but the black kids get sentenced to prison? What kind of justice is that?

13
Crystal - 11:07 am 9/21/2007

Okay, in response to Bill, what the heck are you talking about? Black people don't ever want to admit that they're wrong? That is the least of their worries. Granted, beating that white kid up the way they did was wrong, but much deserved in my opinion, I agree with Shelley and say you most definitely have to consider all the ridiculous events and injustices that led up to this beating . It is because of these injustices that there were 30,000+ plus people marching for their support. They were not marching to support the beatdown of the white boy, but to fight for justice for the six black boys.

Secondly, where do you get off calling the six boys a gang? There has been no evidence that these boys were a gang. That just shows how small-minded you are by automatically giving them that negative connotation and classification of a gang…get real. And how do you consider the fight a hate crime? Since when did getting your tail whooped become a hate crime? You would consider that one before the hanging of nooses from a tree? What century are you from? Get with the times!

It is clear to me that due to your small-mindedness you can't see nor want to see the bigger picture. Your ignorance has overshadowed the real matter at hand which is the continuous injustices that the jena 6 have faced as opposed to some typical schoolyard fight. I'm disgusted with your opinion, although you're entitled to it, and totally disagree with it. I woudn't be surprised if you were a racist white resident of that community. Tisk…what a disgrace.

14
Tira - 1:11 pm 9/21/2007

Okay, Bill. I really tried to see the same "crap beaten" victim that you saw, and I just don't see it. I have seen worse with lesser punishment. What exactly makes this a "gang beating"? I just call it kids who were fed up with the BS that the victim and his friends were doing and nothing being done about it. I don't think that violence is the answer, however, he could not have been so dumb to think he could just offend people and get away with it. If he can tie a noose he needs to know that it's not going to be brushed off by the people who are effected. All this was was an after school fight that every school has. Not "attempted murder" And one more thing, black people do not "gripe" about racial issues, we protest! Have you learned anything?

15
James - 1:23 pm 9/21/2007

Ok,
Lets turn this around, 6 white kids beat up a black kid because he taunted the white kids…thats a hate crime and if it wasn't charged as a hate crime all the same people would be in Jena protesting that the charges should be attempted murder. You can't have it both ways. The fact is that this is America and we can believe and say anything we want REGARDLESS of how wrong we are and should not fear physical retrobution for it.

16
Joel - 2:58 pm 9/21/2007

This case reminds me of a stereo recording where the gain on one channel is too low to accurately measure events, or even to detect them.

The best coverage I've seen has been on Democracy Now!, including their July 10th report that helped bring the case of the Jena Six to national attention.

http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/09/21/158237

17
Shelley - 3:29 pm 9/21/2007

"Lets turn this around, 6 white kids beat up a black kid because he taunted the white kids…thats a hate crime and if it wasn't charged as a hate crime all the same people would be in Jena protesting that the charges should be attempted murder. You can't have it both ways. The fact is that this is America and we can believe and say anything we want REGARDLESS of how wrong we are and should not fear physical retrobution for it."

No one is disputing this — no one has said these kids shouldn't receive a fair and just punishment.

The key is 'fair and just'.

The kids should have been punished. These kids started a school fight and hurt a classmate. The thing is, this happens in high schools every day all across the country. But the kids all across the country are NOT charged with attempted second degree murder.

The white guy who beat up the black kid earlier in the week. He was NOT charged with attempted second degree murder.

The white guy who grabbed a gun and pointed it at the black kids — he wasn't charged for this action.

Add to this to the fact that the DA had warned the black students, not the white, that he could take away their lives with the flick of a pen. This is biased treatment of the blacks. This is racism. There's no other to describe this.

The very fact that the town defends this judgment, supports that horrible DA (who needs to be removed from office), tried to put this kid in prison for 15 years, and condoned the biased treatment of the blacks as compared to the whites, spells racism.

This is a racist town. The only way this is going to change, is when they stop mouthing excuses and start making changes.

18
John - 3:39 pm 9/21/2007

"On the other hand, a noose on a tree hardly seems to be a school yard prank but seems to more closely fit the definition of hate crime"

Actually it is not. What can be a hate crime is specific ….. it is NOT any crime that is motivated by hate. Essentially, it is any felony that was done for hateful reasons.

What those teenagers did was incredibly insensitive and likely hateful, but there is simply no way it could be a hate crime. If they did that on their own property … it would be "free speech". The only thing they could be charged with would be vandalism. Despite that, this injustice is something the school administrators should deal with, not the court.

People often misunderstand what a hate crime is. You simply can not jail people for expressing radical ideas. Worst, some people (mostly other blogs) have actually elevated the "Jena 6" to heroes that should be pardon of any wrongdoing. Promotion of such vigilante justice is simply wrong and I really wished people stop painting this situation as black and white (no pun intended). Honestly, both sides are guilty but their crimes are not equal at all ….. the group of young black men obviously esculated the situation to violence.

19
DaveD - 7:04 pm 9/21/2007

John, you almost had me believeing you made some sense and were without bias. But then….

"Honestly, both sides are guilty but their crimes are not equal at all ….. the group of young black men obviously esculated the situation to violence."

That statement totally overlooks one incident that all sides agree on - that a gun was pulled by a white graduate on two black. That that gun was taken. And that the only charge was against the blacks for stealing.

Was that a hate crime? No. As wasn't the beating that resulted in second degree murder charges. But that was never the point.

The point is fairness, and equal justice. And to argue ANY other point - and yes, that includes hate crimes - is to try to turn this topic around to something it is not. And to do it hoping you could avoid the blatent issue of fairness and equal justice.

Shelley - I read both links, and to be honest, they are much more biased… or at least melodramatic in a MSM way than your post. Especially the quoted interviews from democracynow. Make no mistake - I side with their point of view. But the way they present things… compared to you?

Thank you for being not only balanced and fair, but being objective with no apparent agenda. Welcome back from your month-long break!

20
fp - 9:17 pm 9/21/2007

I agree with DaveD on the balance of your presentation, Shelley. Al Sharpton owns the keyword on the whole affair though: "disparities." The reason for the turnout in Jena, the good we can all hope to see come from this, is a greater awareness and perhaps an amelioration of the disparities in justice administration all across the country. Data show that state by state, young black men are incarcerated with greater frequency and longer sentences than young white men for the same crimes. What the Jena cases suggest to me is that often young black men are charged with greater severity than young white men for the same crimes. I don't have the data at hand to prove this, but Jena is certainly a data point if we are going to collect information on that.

The fact is that our prison system is a gulag that has isolated young black men from society, ruined expectations for a whole generation, and needs to be reformed in all aspects, starting with community values that permit disparities in charging and sentencing. Reed Walters, the Jena DA, has a lot to answer for. He and his ilk need to be purged from the criminal justice system. Disbarment proceedings should already be underway. But they're not.

21
Shelley - 1:48 am 9/22/2007

Thanks for the notes on balanced presentation. My first reaction was to go down and tongue lash the DA, but that would probably get me convicted of battery with a dangerous weapon: my mouth. I imagine that uppity wimen are only one step above uppity negroes to that man.

The more I read on this, the more outraged I become. The young man who is still in jail? There was conflicting testimony that he was even involved in this event. Most of the testimony said that he stood over the fallen white kid. The only conflicting testimony? From one of the kids who hung the nooses.

When you read the transcript of the trial, where the public defender assigned Bell didn't put out any kind of defense, you just come away furious.

Now, they won't release Bell from jail even with his conviction vacated because they're going to try him on 'conspiracy' to commit assault. Why? Because according to the DA, he was in the hall, and was 'part of this gang of men'. That's enough to take a person to court for conspiracy — you're in a building.

22
Shelley - 1:53 am 9/22/2007

Oh, and PS

Two young men, 16 and 18, were arrested for driving a pickup truck with nooses dangling out the back past a group of several hundred of the protesters waiting at a bus stop.

The 18 year old was charged with an attempt to incite a riot, but they don't know if they're going to charge the 16 year old with anything.

23
Karoli - 4:16 am 9/22/2007

Several things outrage me about this case, beginning with the fact that it was largely overlooked by the MSM despite the outcry by many across the country. It was not until very recently that it became a "story" that was reported. And yet, the Duke LaCrosse case was in the news nearly every day for a year. Why is that?

Based on what I've read and seen since learning about this case, this Louisiana town has been in a time warp for about 40 years or so. No civil rights movement there; instead they have 'white trees' and whitewashed excuses for why incidents which are clearly race-based are overlooked, particularly when they involve white on black violence.

Now we have this boy sitting in jail despite the fact that his sentence has been overturned and a new trial ordered. Would a white boy still be there, assuming he were actually charged, which is a large assumption indeed.

My experience with online communities has jaded me — there are instances of racism every single day in comments, on message boards, in innocuous discussions that aren't even issues-related. Racism is alive and well in this country, and the roots are deepest in these little southern towns where accountability is limited and power is corrupt.

24
Sheri - 1:29 am 9/23/2007

Karoli- you see racism everyday? Gee, well I see sexism, homophobia, antisemitism, and racism against asians- and you know what? A disproportinate amount of it comes from the african american community. Look at your own double standards! In the case of the Jena 6, the most glaring example is the belief this white boy did something to diserve being attacked by 7 black kids. Where is the proof? There is zero!! That is as bad as saying that the people who hung the nooses are the victims- that they were provoked into doing it. I'm sure the KKK and their supporters blamed the victim too, so sad that so many faux "civil rights activists" follow these same tactics! Shame on you!

25
Rachel - 11:20 am 9/23/2007

This has been very enlightening as I read everyone's comments. I think that everyone needs to do their own research into this story and see some facts for themselves…

http://friendsofjustice.wordpress.com/2007/07/02/ineffective-assistance-of-counsel-what-blane-williams-should-have-known/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jena_Six

These aforementioned links have credible references to the articles and the court docs…

Try reading them… literacy counts…

What gets me is that if one was to read the whole thing, the fact that there were 6 persons accused of this act is funny to me.. because the only thing that was said was that one person hit Justin Baker. What strikes me also as interesting is that the additional names didnt come into play until AFTER the Coach gave a list of kids who were THERE… not a list of kids who participated…and the female who testified to the additional children ( the female named Kristy Martin, who retrieved the list of names from Coach Spence of ROWDY, not FIGHTING students…) WASNT EVEN A WITNESS to the alleged event–

It isnt fair to label a group of people of a certain race a "gang", it isnt fair to say that African-Americans as a whole discriminate against Jews, Asians, and anyone else…(i.e. George Carlin, Dennis Leary, Sam Kinison, Carlos Mencia, Michael Richards, the infamous "Flied Lice" quip on Leathal Weapon 4 by Mel Gibson… and oh yeah did we forget about his OWN anti-Semitic remarks…and the beat goes on—), it's not fair to says that "African-Americans" support the ACT of kicking someones ass, but perhaps the act of convicting kids of ATTEMPTED MURDER over a school fight? … THAT'S the issue… Yes, I've seen the pic…

http://pursuingholiness.com/2007/09/04/the-jena-6-photo-of-justin-barkers-injuries/

I'm quite certain "little Johnny" has never been given an attempted murder rep for coming home after giving someone a black eye and a bloody nose, regardless of what the reason was, whether he was called a pussy, or was told that his mother wears combat boots…whether he beat "arse" with fists, or tennis shoes, or his Trapper Keeper..

No matter how much you slice it, dice it, or even make julienne fries, this set of circumstances just doesnt wash..

26
Sheri - 3:28 pm 9/23/2007

Try reading them… literacy counts…

It's that kind of smarmy name calling that makes many of the supporters of the Jena 6 lack credibility. There is no proof the victim of the beating antagonized this… except the people who support them will believe everything they say. I've had black people try and provoke me with some of the vilest language and threats I've ever heard… so why is the Jena 6 in jail and I'm not, guess what, it's not cause I'm white, it's caused I walked away, duh!!

27
Shelley - 3:41 pm 9/23/2007

This is a difficult topic, which requires more, rather than less, care in what we write, no matter what your opinions are.

People wanting to indulge in anything less than thoughtful discussion only demean themselves in this comment thread. Fill free to continue to embarrass yourselves, but just think about how your writing compares with others willing to take a little more time to provide a more reasoned opinion.

28
fp - 4:43 pm 9/23/2007

Shelley, I agree, this IS a difficult topic. It is made more difficult by the fact that a wrong was done by the Jena 6. They beat up another boy and the authorities have held them accountable. The Chicago Tribune said,

The Jena case has drawn national protests because of the perception of many African Americans that blacks are treated more harshly than whites in the town's criminal justice system.

The Chicago Tribune understates the situation when they speak of the "perception of many African Americans." If these kids can't get their records expunged they will be stigmatized for life. That stigma will carry with it the documented consequences of being effectively excluded from the labor market. (See Marked, by Devah Pager.)

The disparity in treatment between whites and blacks in the justice system is huge, and the consequences of that disparity have a profound effect on our ability as a nation to provide equal opportunities for all. The entire justice system needs a closer look, and the unfortunate facts surrounding the Jena 6 make that clear.

Should there have been an arrest? Should the DA have charged the kids with a felony, and how should the case have been prosecuted? What discretion had the judge in terms of sentencing options and adjustment of charges? Why is Mychal Bell still in jail? What options exist for his release?

I think there is data to show that black men are often charged when white men would receive warnings. I know there is data to show that black men receive harsher sentences than white men when convicted of equivalent crimes. And there is the amazing fact of more than ten times as many black men imprisoned per capita in the USA than white men. This is not about racism in small southern towns. This is about a national shame that we conveniently hide beneath the history of racial tension in the old south.

Look at the circumstances leading up to the Jena 6 arrests. White kids undoubtedly crossed the line in terms of mishandling weapons, beating up other kids, and trying to create a climate of fear by hanging nooses, the symbol of black lynchings, on a tree in the school yard. But authorities used their discretion not to prosecute these offensive acts. When black kids crossed that line between right and wrong, the District Attorney was quick to bring them up on felony charges, as he had told them at a high school assembly that he could. Somebody turned the spotlight on Jena, Louisiana and it revealed this huge structural flaw in our justice system. But the spotlight could as easily shine on my home state of Wisconsin. Anecdotally, I am aware of a lot of African Americans of all ages who are pulled over simply for Driving While Black. (The link is to an article from Minnesota Law Review by Professor David Harris that provides statistical documentation for the "perception" regarding disparate treatment of white versus non-white drivers). If they are not appropriately circumspect, if they don't project an attitude of humility, these random stops can turn into arrests. And once charged, the system is tuned to incarcerate black men at a rate ten times that of white men. It's bigger than Jena, LA, but in Jena we have a chance to halt the injustice before more lives are ruined.

29
Rachel - 8:49 pm 9/23/2007

" 'Try reading them… literacy counts…'

It's that kind of smarmy name calling that makes many of the supporters of the Jena 6 lack credibility."
–Sheri

********

As I wonder when a call to read equates to name calling…

There isnt ANY name calling of either side of the "field" or the situation, as anyone can see, in my comment.

Taking the time and resources to do research, using both logic and rationale can prove to be productive in circumstances like these…and neither did I make the issue of "which 'race' I am", or whose "side" I'm on..except for the side of objectivity.

For my part, the only thing important is the "crime" fitting the necessity of "attempted murder"(which it seems not to–or else everyone that has been involved in school fights regarless of the reason shouldve been behind bars YEARS ago), and the strange and insatiable need to make blanket rules of behavior for persons who are different from ourselves(which seems to harken to the days of 'separate but equal' aka APARTHEID). It STILL isnt fair to say that ALL "african -americans" are racist just like its not fair to assess that all Caucasians are racist; not all "African-Americans" live in the projects and not all Caucasians live in the suburbs…

If a country is to band together it is best to try to undestand each other and not be ill willed or easily angered by NON-inflammatory speech.

:)

30
Charvon - 2:52 pm 9/25/2007

I have so much to say its ridiculous but let me address Bill properly first. Bill I am a black woman and I have no problem admitting that what those boys did was wrong. What I do have aproblem with is you and everybody else forgetting that fights happen in school everyday and evryday somebody gets jumped but its not everyday that someone gets jumped by 6 boys and leaves the hospital the same day, so your over exaggerant comments are juvenile. You label people who you don;t know as thugs and call it a gang beating and you are encouraging stereotypes. How do you know that these wern't a couple of young men that had enough? And who the hell are you to say what the black community EVER does? Have you ever been to a black community? (just a question) It was not a hate crime it was a simple school yard fight that some white people chose to blow out of proportion (you see how I didn't categorize your entire race? I said some) Now them nooses, that was a hate crime! Them beating his ass that was simple battery. if they really wanted to seriiously hurt him they could have and wouldn't take 6 to do it. I'm a female and I have knocked a 6ft 4 white boy clean the fuck out with no help, not bragging on my past ignorance but he advanced at me first and I had to protect myself which I did, did I still get in trouble yes. was it attempted murder? no. was it a hate crime just cause of our different skin tones? no. Educate yourself, know what a hate crime is. The crime should fit the punishment and theirs does not and any school I've attended regardless if the person got they ass handed to them or not they got suspended for violence. Not hate crimes and not murder!

31
Charvon - 3:47 pm 9/25/2007

Chris I respect your position because I too believe these boys should ALL be punished, now Jail, for the fight I don't think so. Fights happen everyday in school and no one goes to jail so what makes this situation so different? And please read and listen for comprehension because they did NOT nearly beat him to death by far! He escaped with a concussion and minor cuts and bruises and they relaesed him 2 hours later and he attended a social function. Yeah sound pretty close to death to me!

James: Honey if it was a black kid that got beat up by six white kids it would have been overlooked and then yes the balck folks would protest and I"m hoping they would say suspend those boys. I highly doubt that an attempted murder charge would be even thouhgt of. Nobody is saying that they are not worng for what they did or that its some how justified thru previous incidents, they're sayin Attempted murder or any criminal charge is a far fetch for a school yard fight. I've been taunted by plenty of white people because I attended all white schools and I've taunted my own share of whites blacks and hispanics and I've beat my own share of asses. None of them were hate crimes so how do you figure this should be?

John: You try to say the balcks escalated this to violence but it started out as violence all along. You may call a noose free speech but I call it a threat on somones (particularyly blackk people) life. A piece of rope tied into a loop is a weapon just as much as a gun. You bring a gun to school and get caught, you didn't use the gun, it had no bullets but you still suffer the consequnces of bringing a weapon to school. Well dammit we all know what a noose is for just as well as we know what a gun is for, so you bring a noose to school but its cool as long as nobody's head is in it. Well a gun is cool too as long as nobody pulls the trigger? Sounds like violence to me pimp. re-evaluate please!

AL Sharpton and the rest of them need to sit down some where cause they makin us look bad. I agree them boys don't deserve the punishment theyb are tryin to give them but I also think they do deserve some punishment and that these so called black leaders are missing the point. Yes the point is to get justice but we need to send the right message in doing so. They have made everyone in that town out to be racist, and have slandered sevral people and its forming a circle. Whites are racist to blacks making balcks retaliate and speak out and their words are not wisely chosen so they as well become racist. I love peole of every color (even asains Sheri) but I too have my stereotypical moments but thats something that we will never get rid of. Racism is easy to get rid of but no ones willing, even the blacks. We talk big talk but at the end of the day we go home and do the same thing, we put down our fellow man instead of building them up, we put down those in our own racial "category" and eventually begin to bring ourselves down. I've had multi racial friends all my life and skin color was never a problem because I didn't hold my friends to the stereotypes placed on their race and sometimes upheld by their own. And they didn't hold me to any either. We stepped all over racism as children yet the adults of today can't seem to do so. Beleive what you will and stand firm to right of freedom of speech but think about how your actions makes someone else feel un safe. What happens when you back a frightened animal (with teeth) into a corner? (nooses was just a prank?)

32
Charvon - 4:01 pm 9/25/2007

Last one and I"m out! Sheri: Guess what just like you I too had black people , white people, and Asain people, say some ugly stuff to me and because I had a temper I didn't walk away, I beat they ass but I aint in jail either so whats your point? it sounds to me that you have a personal vendetta against black people and you may want to pray on that. But sweetie don't make it seem as if you are a better person for walkin away maybe a bigger person at that time but not better. You are not in jail because you chose to walk away and because they woudln't have put yo ass in jail over a simple fight and you know it. Maybe if we take the colors away you'd be able to see clearer. A group of boys jumped a boy at school. Now form an opinion without thinkin of the color. Don't make all black people out to be violent and evil cause we're not. I had a violent streak in school but I felt I had to because I wasn't going to end up like my mother gettin jumped everyday after school and I didn't, could I have chosen another route? yes, but I didn't and I paid consequnces. And just to let you know m,y mother got jumped evryday in California by a group of Asain girls but do I hate asains and think they are all violent karate people? No, i love you with the love of the lord sister.

33
Johnny - 12:55 am 9/28/2007

Yeah, this is freaking appalling. Six blacks gang up on one white kid and commit assault and battery in most cowardly fashion — this was no "gentlemen's disagreement," not with six-on-one — and the black "establishment" and all the bleeding heart pitiful white liberal fanatics come rushing down to defend these poor black boys, these veritable pillars of the community. These youths obviously have a well developed violent gang mentality; their actions speak volumes. And yes, this is a hate crime by the very standards the black "establishment" and bleeding heart liberal wackos have pushed and pushed for. Oh, we can't have it cut both ways, though, can we? We have to maintain the ever-popular double standard, because blacks are entitled to get away scot-free with stuff they would crucify whitey for. What an unreal bunch of crapola.

34
FromJena - 4:37 pm 9/28/2007

ATTENTION EVERYBODY: If you want to read what the eye witnesses reported to the police regarding the Justin Barker beating, Gotta Go incident, and Fair Barn incident, please go to http://www.evangelicaloutpost.com/. You can now read what they saw and form your own opinion, as opposed to listening to opinions swayed by stacks upon stacks of inaccuracies. This is straight from the horse's mouth.

Shelley:

"Even the town's most fervent supports acknowledge the white kid taunted the black kids. This was a hall fight triggered by anger that got out of control, and should have been prosecuted this way."

I am a supporter of Justin Barker (because he was the victim), and I DO agree that he was taunting at least one of the guys (Mychal Bell). One eye witness who was right there says she saw Barker flip the middle finger to Mychal Bell. Here is the catch, though: Who was the instigator of this argument? No one knows for sure, but as you can see SEVERAL eye witnesses filled out statements saying that these guys had bullied or ganged up on 3 or 4 OTHER male white students that day. Some say one was pushed several times, another almost got slapped in the back of the head, the other heard a "You're next" after the fight, another one said these guys gathered around him after the bell rang until his friend showed up. All of the statements filled out say that multiple male black students were gathered around in every instance. Judging by the eye witness statements, it is very clear to me what their intentions were that day. So after reviewing THIS information, who would you suspect was the instigator?

35
Shelley - 5:13 pm 9/28/2007

FromJena, I'm not going to get into the same set of arguments here that I did with you over at Pursuing Holiness. The eyewitness statements conflict, many of the statements were taken days after the event, and it looks like some were based on leading questions. I wouldn't prosecute anyone based on those statements.

You don't agree and nothing is going to change that.

36
Cachet - 7:26 pm 9/29/2007

i feel that the six boys did not deserve to be sentenced to almost life for giving a white kid a black eye. Kids fight all the time at school and in the streets, they get black eyes, broken legs and arms, but do you see them getting charged with attempted murder? and to say that those kids are in a gang that is dumb. How can you catagorize kids because they fight, is it because they are black.

37
Johnny - 4:23 am 9/30/2007

Uh, Cachet, did you miss the fact that SIX blacks simultaneously beat the white kid? It goes far beyond "giving someone a black eye." When six people jump one person, beat him to the ground, and continue laying into him en masse to the point where he needs imminent medical attention, then, by golly, you got a problem: you got felony assault. And with six guys going to town on one incapacitated guy, the obvious intention was to inflict serious bodily harm, to maim or perhaps even to kill. I personally got into my share of fistfights growing up — my dad raised me not to run away from a fight — but never, not once, did I or any of my friends go two-on-one. Here you have a case of six-on-one.

If six whites did this to one black kid, the bigot and scam-artist Sharpton, along with his entourage of hate-blinded bigoted followers, would be beating on the jailhouse doors brimming with venom for the accursed whiteys. And, there would be a demand for the hate crime laws to be invoked. You know it. And, yes, this is the same good ol' Al Sharpton who wanted to all but castrate three white boys in North Carolina who were ultimately found to be utterly innocent of the charges, the same Sharpton who then sauntered away from that debacle without so much as an apology, without acknowledging the serious injustice that was averted, and without even well-wishing the falsely accused boys. That's some guy, that's quite a poster boy for "civil rights."

38
Shelley - 6:49 am 9/30/2007

I'm shutting down this thread due to noise/signal ratio.

Thanks to all those who have contributed to the discussion. Comments are now closed, but you can contact the author of the post directly.