Categories
outdoors Photography Places

Echoing rocks

Saturday’s weather was warm and mild for this time of year, as I set out to visit the Falls at Johnson Shut-Ins, and then Elephant Rocks on the way back. As I drove out to the Shut-Ins, I kept my eye out for the MDOT sign that proclaimed that this next mile I would drive would be cleaned up by the fine folks of the Ku Klux Klan. I couldn’t find it where it was supposed to be, on Highway 21 just north of the intersection with Highway 8. I guess someone had taken it down again.

Signs aplenty, though; yard after yard along the way with green and white signs saying, “Jesus”, handed out by one of the local churches. Not to mention all the homes in Iron Country proudly flying the Confederate Flag.

The water in the Shut-Ins was high and they were particularly beautiful that day, with the mix of running water and frozen ice. There was family exploring about and it was pleasant walking here and there and listening to their good natured chatter. Once the father stepped in front of me when I was lining up a photo and then apologized for ruining the picture. I told him he didn’t ruin it, he was acting as an unpaid model. He liked that, went to tell his kids he was a model.

lonewalk4.jpg

It was late when I got to the Elephant Rocks, with only a couple of cars in the parking lot. There was this old woman walking around the lot using a walker, just circling about. When she passed me, she smiled, wished me a good day as she continued her dedicated circling.

Out among the rocks I passed one couple as they were leaving, but there was no one else about, which is unusual for the Rocks. It was a beautiful day, too — sunny and cold and the late afternoon light looked nice against the red granite with their streaks of green lichen.

lonewalk5.jpg

At the overlook I heard what sounded like voices ahead of me and when I turned the corner there was a man standing behind one of the boulders. I thought he was speaking with someone but he could have been peeing in the shelter of the rocks. I averted my eyes just in case, not wanting to embarrass him. While I was admiring the view of the valley, he passed me, wishing me good day with a nice smile.

A bit later I ran into him again as he was standing on the path looking at some of the rocks. As I passed he pointed out where the granite work had stopped and mentioned that the quarry played out when most of what was left was granite that was too soft. I said that he sounded very knowledgeable about the quarry and he replied that he’d worked with rock at one time.

bigrocks2.jpg

Later when I was taking photos around the Elephant Rock formation, I could see his feet beneath the overhanging rocks, hear him walking about, but he didn’t say anything, just looked about and moved on.

Finally it was getting cold and late and I left, heading on the trail past the old quarry lake. The man was there and smiled again and seemed pleasant enough. I stopped to look at the Lake like I always do and we fell into a conversation.

rockquarry.jpg

He said he’d been at quarries all over the country — liked to walk among them. He pointed out that the lake below us was only about 40 feet deep, but one up in Wisconsin was over 400 feet. He asked where I lived and when I told in St. Louis, near Webster Groves, he mentioned that he’s spoken at the college there once. I asked if he was a teacher or a researcher or something and he paused and said, no, he worked with the homeless, with people who were in trouble.

People who were in trouble, I do remember him using that phrase.

He was about my height, stocky, wearing an old fashioned wool hunter’s coat and seemed like new hat. He had deeply brown eyes, I remember that. Beautiful brown eyes, and dark brown hair to match. His hands were tough, like he’d been working in dirt lately, and there was an old, old twisted gold ring on his wedding finger.

He said he was from Chicago, but he lived all over now — going wherever he was needed. Said that the kids in St. Louis needed him now, they were killing each other with drugs and hate. I asked who he worked with and he named a minister’s name, but I didn’t recognize it.

He was pleasant to talk to but it was getting cold, so I bid him good-bye and headed down the path. He turned to me, looked at me intently as I started walking away and said, “You be careful now.”

When I got back to the parking lot, I noticed that my car was the only one in the lot. There was no one else around, and the only place close to the park was the trailer for the park manager. I wondered if he was a friend of the manager’s, but there was no cars there, either.

As I got into the car and prepared to leave, I noticed him walking down from the path into the parking lot, hands in his pocket, walking without any hurry. I pulled out slowly, looking at him in my rearview mirror as I drove away. He didn’t head for the trailer but headed out the way I was leaving, to the road leaving the park. However he got there, he didn’t get there by car.

I found myself almost circling back to offer him a lift, but didn’t. It was not in my nature to not offer a helping hand, but I just kept going.

bigrocks4.jpg

Categories
Burningbird Social Media

Focusing on the social in social software

Yule, who is about the most wonderful kicker of butts I know of, posted a link to my previous entry in a comment at another thread related to comment spamming. Unfortunately, the tone of my post had more impact then the words, which shows the dangers of writing in anything other than the most non-emotive manner. But then, what’s the fun of that?

I am frustrated, and I have no qualms about introducing a frustrated tone into my writing when it comes to comment spammers, and webloggers and their reaction thereof. For a people who pride themselves so much on being social software devotees, I’ve never seen a group of people less likely to recognize brilliant social software in action then webloggers. And yes, it is frustrating.

The comment spammers have met and pushed past any barrier we put up. They do so by listening to what we say, and then acting accordingly. They move past the barriers because anything we do other than a re-engineer of the MT comment system is nothing more than an obstacle, not a closed door to the spammers. What we do, though, is overreact. We put on the most amazingly complicated code that if we’re hit with anything approaching some of the new Script Kiddies MT comment attacks, we’re done because the machine can’t keep up the processing. We blacklist at the drop of a hat, using each others blacklist import lists without once considering that each might have good URLs in addition to the bad.

In other words, we take it personally, while the comment spammers take it professionally, and we’ll never win the battle with odds such as these.

I used to take it personally until I started following the actions of the comment spammers. Now, sorry for offending folks, I’m filled with admiration for them. I still think that Tim O’Reilly should have featured comment, and email, spammers as speakers at the Emerging Tech Conference. These people really do know the concepts behind social software, and we could do well to emulate them. In other words, they learn from watching us? We should learn by watching them.

But I’ve said all this before, and this is frustrating.

Categories
Burningbird Technology Weblogging

MT Comment Help

Recovered from the Wayback Machine.

I’m not starting up Burningbird but a lot of good people were hit badly by a very sophisticated comment spam attack, including the Wayward webloggers who I’m responsible to.

The attackers this time only posted three comments to each post, each with different names, and different URLs. They either used spoofing or they’ve harnessed open computers to submit the comments – I think they’ve used traditional DDoS attacks this time, so be careful using IP banning, you could be banning innocent people.

Did mt-blacklist work? No. As I’ve said before, spammers have better habits then so-called legitimate developers, because they listen to their ‘customers’ and adapt accordingly.

In the meantime, clean up:

The only easy way to clean up is directly in MySQL. Even *mt-blacklist will require that you hunt down each individual URL and delete it – time consuming. If you don’t know how to access MySQL then ask for help in comments, send me an email, or ask help from your friends online.

In MySQL directly, or through PHPAdmin, to remove the comments, use the following:

delete from mt_comment where comment_created_on > ‘2004-01-12 15:40:08′;

Change the date to fit your needs, the format is yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm:ss. This will delete all comments after the timestamp. Be careful or you’ll lose comments you want to keep. In fact, always make a backup before you start global deletions. You can use mysqldump to back up your entire database at any time (check MySQL site for how to use mysqldump). Or you can use MT’s backup.

Once deleted, rebuild your site to clear the comments from your pages.

If you want, you can turn off comments on all entries older than 30 days using the following SQL:

update mt_entry set entry_allow_comments = 2 where
TO_DAYS(NOW()) – TO_DAYS(entry_created_on) >= 30;

This closes comments on all entries 30 days old or older. Most comment spams are on older content, which are also less likely to have legitimate comments so this isn’t a bad option. You can run this yourself manually every week or so, or you can add it as a cron job. If you’re unfamiliar with cron, holler.

The spammers have gotten smarter. Eventually if you restrict their access enough, you’ll shut down comments to everyone. The only true solution to this problem is better comment management in MT. However, if you feel as clever as the spammers, perhaps you need to attend a smart people conference, come up with nifty, neato, just gee wiz smart solutions (put into the public domain of course, with the cutest little cc brand.)

This is a short-term post, with comments allowed for now. However, with the keywords in the post, it’s now a target for comment spammers, so I’ll be closing comments in a couple of days, and then put the post into draft mode – the individual page will still exist, but it will disappear from comment posting as well as this front page.

Note that the more metablogging talk you do in your weblog, the more you use the words ‘comment’ and ’spam’ or ’spammer’, the more you make yourself a victim. That’s how they’re finding your posts. I imagine that they had a bit of a chuckle when they made this run.

*Update

For all the mt-blacklist users, if you’re using global lists and not checking that legitimate URLs have been inserted, then chances are you’re opening your system up for a poison pill attack – causing your system to filter common, legitimate URLs, and hence making the mt-blacklist less reliable. The technique is common in email spam, as outlined by Ken Coar. Something to think of next time you import several hundred entries, depending on technology when the spammers depend on their brains.

However, makes no nevermind to me what you do. I’m just passing through.

Second update

There is an MT plug-in that allows you to turn off comments on older postings. I haven’t tried it, but others have and it seems to be working. It’s at http://www.rayners.org/2003/12/27/closing_comments_on_old_entries.php.

Previous writings on comment spam:

You’ve been comment spammed, your life as you now know it is over

Making a Deliberate Choice

Comment Spam? Or DOS

Spammers : getting to know you

Passive Resistence

DDT for Comments

Using Google Against Us

Comment and Trackback spamming

Comment Spam QuickFix

Comment Spammers Redux

Variations on a Nasty Theme

Categories
Just Shelley

To Keep Burningbird Or Not

Recovered from the Wayback Machine.

One issue I’ve been debating off and of about with myself is whether to keep the Burningbird weblog. I’ve splintered off so many interests into different weblogs, and the main reason I do so is there is there is an assumption that everything I write is somehow a ‘flame’ and what I write then becomes seen in this manner. I’ve become hesitant about even making comments in other weblogs because of this.

Yes, I am a passionate writer, and yes, I can have a temper. But I’m also capable of calm reason, instances of beauty, thoughtfulness, generosity, and even playfulness. I am growing very concerned that my writing is perceived surrounded by a faint ghostly lick of flame; I wonder how much of it is truly being seen, read in its own regard, or just dismissed as so much ‘Burningbird’ burning.

I look at other webloggers who have acheived a reputation for thoughtful writing, such as Jonathon Delacour or Joi Ito or AKMA or Liz Lawley, as well as other folks both liked and, perhaps more importantly, respected. It is true that for the most part, they do think carefully before they write, and this is reflected in their writing. But I’ve seen all four write angrily, become cranky, and even get a bit snippy (and I say this with respect, so please, all of you don’t get angry with me). Of course they do, and that’s what makes all of them so enjoyable to read. I don’t want to read the writing of automatons.

Yet how much of this is perceived because they have a (well deserved) persona of being a thoughtful writer? As I have that, equally well deserved, persona of being what? Passionate? Hot tempered? A whiney, negative, self-centered, tempermental bitch with a cause?

I wrote a comment in another weblog this morning that I had hoped to be seen as thoughtful, but ended up being perceived as an attack. In fact, from the response, it was seen as me being the same old Burningbird. I wouldn’t mind being taken to task for bad writing, or a thoughtless comment — but it was painted as me being me, and disregarded because of same.

Stops me dead in my tracks.

Maybe splintering the writing into different weblogs won’t do a bit of good because it’s too late for me — I am Burningbird, and Burningbird is me. And regardless of how I write, and what I write, I’ll never been seen as anything else.

Categories
Political

Carbon Copies

Speaking of politics, the BBC has a listing of year end quotes from world leaders, among which is the following:

The capture of Saddam Hussein and the highly significant decision of Libya to give up its weapons of mass destruction provided a positive end to the year. In 2004, there can be no let up in the struggle against international terrorism. We are all its potential targets. As in the past, the government’s goals in the New Year will be to maintain for (our country) national security, economic strength and social stability.

President Bush you think? Not a bit of it. This is Australian Prime Minister John Howard’s end of the year quote, only altered to remove the country name to fool you, the unsuspecting audience.

The Taiwanese President talks about peaceful discussions and collaboration with China, while the Chinese President talks about reunification of the motherland. Nothing new there.

Then there was this, by the Ugandan leader, Yoweri Museveni:

Aids still remains a problem. We must close all the loopholes through which Aids is coming. The main route is promiscuity. Anti-retrovirals are not a cure. They prolong life, all right. However, that life is permanently gloomy. Avoid unprotected sex if you are promiscuous.

Though Museveni’s rejection of medicines, which have been shown to help AIDs sufferers live more than a ‘gloomy existence’ is discouraging, he at least admits that the country has an AIDs problem. Which is more than can be said for the South African President’s end of the year address, which doesn’t meantion AIDs, the country’s leading killer, once.

However, before you think I scoff at these world leaders, let me say that they have my utmost respect. After all, they aren’t warning their police forces to be on the lookup for people carrying Farmer’s Almanacs or maps; nor doing their damnedest to discourage travel into or out of the country.

Hmmm. In my recent trip I carried maps. In fact, I drove by the Western White House when the President was in residence, carrying a map of Texas with me.

Please don’t tell on me.