Categories
Political

In support of ACORN

The current Republican hand waving is now focused on ACORN, the organization’s perennial punching bag whenever a state or national election could be close. You see, it’s not in the Republicans interest to have everyone who is qualified to vote, to actually vote. If it were up to the Republicans, they would filter out anyone who isn’t conservative, middle class or above, and especially white.

ACORN is an organization focused on getting people to vote, ensuring that people equal access to housing and education, supportive of unions, and decent working conditions. Really, how awful—what do these people think this country is?

ACORN and Missouri have a long history together because my state is always held up as the poster child for voter registration fraud. Governor Blunt, a man so despised after his one and only term as governor that he didn’t even run again, says it’s all the fault of ACORN and that the organization is committing deliberate fraud in order to register Democratic voters.

What he doesn’t say is that ACORN is typically the first to actually flag suspicious voters. That the organization has turned in to the authorities voter registrars it believes are deliberately creating fraudulent registrations. That it cannot, by law, not turn in any registration it receives. So even if you register as Mickey Mouse, all that the ACORN registrar can do is flag the registration for the election committee, who then has to determine if the registration is fake or not.

You read that correctly: ACORN, any voter registration organization, cannot discard any voter registration card. By law. This is so that organizations can’t “pretend” to register folks, and then discard the registrations in an attempt to rig the vote.

We had a group of six ACORN registration workers convicted of fraud in St. Louis because they used the phone book to create duplicate registrations in order to get paid by ACORN without doing any actual work. There was no universal attempt to “rig” an election. There has never been any attempt to fraudulently rig an election–it’s all about money. It would be nice if ACORN didn’t have to pay people, but another purpose behind the organization is to provide jobs whenever possible. Among those who take these jobs, you’re always going to have the bad apples.

Plus, it’s not easy getting volunteers nowadays. We can’t even fill all poll worker positions in the state, and they’re paid, too.

How big is this problem? ACORN registered 53,000 people in the state of Missouri. How many registrations forms are being questioned? According to what the ACORN staff here in this state were told: 135 questionable cards, 89 considered duplicate. Wow, we can really take over the state and the country with this huge effort to commit fraud.

The purpose of the ACORN effort, all voter registration efforts, though, is noble, and I won’t hear anything against it. To me, I can’t think of any higher purpose than to ensure that everyone qualified to vote is registered to vote, and then encouraged to vote. The biggest problem we’ve been having with our elections in the last couple of decades is fewer people actually voting. It’s a sad state when your elected representatives are elected by a minority of people.

I am tired that an organization whose sole purpose is to help people like you and me, become the Republican fall guy every election, because the Republicans can’t focus on the issues. Why not focus on the issues? Because the Republican platform basically sucks. It asks people to give up their right to health care, to being treated decently in their job, to access to good home loans regardless of country of origin or race; that we don’t start three more wars before the two we have going are at least finished; the party that doesn’t want people to remember that the current Republican president entered office with a budget surplus and a healthy economy, and has dug a financial hole so deep, we may never get out. In other words the Republican party deplores any organization, or candidate, who works to ensure this country is the “great” country we claim it to be. To put into deed that which the Republicans can only put into words. Angry, divisive words, too—full of fear and hate of “others”.

Governor Matt Blunt is desperately trying to “earn” his way into the McCain White House, and is using ACORN as his key. That’s what is happening in my state, in a nut shell. And if you think Sarah Palin would be the worst disaster in the White House, you haven’t met Matt Blunt.

Does Senator Obama have a history with voter registration? With working to ensure that all people have equal access to the polls? Yes, but then so did James Chaney, Andrew Goodman, and Michael Schwerner. And if those names don’t ring a bell, I suggest you look them up in Google while you think on what’s really at stake, and what the Republicans are really trying to do with this election.


Update:

Rogers Cadenhead:

Powers’ entry generated more than 100 comments on the Drudge Retort, where I was surprised to hear from people who think that more people voting is a bad idea. “Why weren’t the founders of our country concerned with ‘everyone’s right’ to vote in a presidential election?” one asked.

The founding fathers didn’t think women should vote, treated blacks as property, and were divided on whether Americans should be required to own property to vote. In 1788, Thomas Jefferson wrote a letter asserting that women were “too wise to wrinkle their foreheads with politics.”

Mad props to those white male 18th century landowners for the American Revolution, First Amendment, powdered wigs and Samuel Adams Pale Ale, but the idea we should defer to their views on voting is obscene.

Categories
Technology

New Apple notebooks

Interesting reading about the new Apple notebooks. They do sound very attractive, but I think people were expecting a little more when it came to the “under $1,000” market. One dollar under is more marketing than real commitment to the changing times. You can’t even buy a gallon of gas, or milk, for under a buck nowadays.

I’m sure all the machines will do well, and many will sell. They do sound innovative, and rather powerful. I won’t be buying a new machine, but good for those that can.

Categories
People

A truly deserving prize

Throughout the current economic crises, and well before, there’s one person I’ve returned to again and again for both thoughtful commentary on matters economical and political, and reassurance in difficult times and that’s Paul Krugman. I’m absolutely delighted to read he’s won the Nobel Prize in Economics. I cannot think of anyone who has a better grasp of the state of world economics than Mr. Krugman.

I gather that he also has critics among the other economists because of his liberal views. Considering that the conservatives just issued in a $700 billion bail out, I think I’ll stick with the liberals.

Categories
Diversity Semantics

How Not to write about the semantic web

How not to attract new semantic web readers, especially among the women. Write the following:

I just thought that this is a smart strategy to make video tutorials about the Semantic Web more appealing to female* or otherwise not so super-tech-savvy* audiences: Just put a Lolcat in it!

Though the author wrote that she matches the “stereotype”, which I guess means women who aren’t tech and like LOLcats, by the time I followed the asterisks, I’d already passed from astonishment to loathing. FYI, I wrote the first book on RDF, babes.

A reference to females was unnecessary. Surprising, too, from the same company featuring an interview with Corinna Bath, author of the thesis, “Towards a De-Gendered Design of Information Technologies”.

Categories
RDF Semantics

This Week’s Semantic Web, Burningbird style

Recovered from the Wayback Machine.

Last week, Danny Ayers made a request to the semantic web community at large: that we take turns publishing our own version of This Week’s Semantic Web. I volunteered to start, and hope that others follow, though in comments to Danny’s post, the suggestion about the Gem of the Week sounded better (and a lot less work).

However, I decided to add a slight twist to my own version of This Week’s Semantic Web, focusing not only on the stories, but how I found them. After all, the real purpose of the semantic web technologies is to make information easier to find. How are we, in the semantic web community, doing in this regard?

To start, I subscribe to various feeds including Planet RDF, as a way to keep up with most of the semantic web news. This week, the stories from Planet RDF that caught my eye were the following:

  • Tom Heath wrote How Will We Interact with the Web of Data for IEEE. In his article, Tom proposes that the web homepage, as we know it today, is dead. In its place we’ll have connected pieces of data, pulled together via RDF records (tuples), which are then used to generate the human readable content. So one could have weblog, browser, feeds, friend feeds, and other online “islands of data”, Flickr and other photos, videos on YouTube, etc.—all annotated with metadata and brought together, mechanistically, because of the metadata annotation. It’s interesting, and we already have some of this with various widget-enabled devices, but I’m not sure that most people are “geek enough” to make this a truly viable option. Not yet.
  • Bob DuCharme wrote a follow-up piece to his Leaning more about SPARQL, related to forming SPARQL queries against DBPedia, the site dedicated to making Wikipedia information queriable. No, that’s not a word…but it should be. Bob’s example is important for two reasons. The first, and the most obvious, reason is that it, of course, demonstrates SPARQL against a published source—hopefully spurring on other efforts. More importantly, though, in my opinion, is that Bob is publishing his explorations, his learning experiences, not necessarily a finished, “Ta da!” work. We need more journals of discovery in the semantic web world.

I don’t only get my semantic web information from the Planet RDF feed. I find other entries on this topic, now and again, in other feeds. For instance, I wrote about two other items this week and I’ll repeat links to both because I feel they represent the semantic world “in the wild”.

  • A List Apart featured an article titled Understanding Progressive Enhancement, which discussed the concept of building one’s website from the inside out—focusing on the properly semantically annotated content, first, before tossing in the pretties. I think this article complements some of the discussion about minimal design that was such a popular topic a few months back. The article not only focuses our attention back on the content, and hence the real purpose for the web site, it also drives home that we need to start doing a better job, semantically speaking, with our use of page markup. Speaking of markup…
  • Tina Holmboe’s XHTML—myths and realities is both an important, and timely, look at XHTML, the importance of XHTML for the semantic world (RDFa), and the future of XHTML. It’s timely because it serves to remind us that we now have two divergent markup paths under the W3C leadership—paths that do not share a common model or focus, which seems to me to act counter to the ultimate goal of a truly semantic web.

In my quest for this week’s semantic web goodies, I also searched in Google on “Semantic Web” and then focused on News, not Web, in order to filter items down to recent events. With this approach, I found the following items to pass along:

    • Paul Miller at ZDNet writes Does the Semantic web matter? He believes it does, a view offered up simply and elegantly. What the semantic web isn’t, though, according to Paul, is a goose to be punched and pummeled by the elitist and the avaricious until forced to deliver up the golden egg. To wit:

Continuing landgrabs by startups that seek to attract, trap and exploit eyeballs stand unashamedly on the shoulders of Semantic Web promise whilst running counter to its basic tenets of linking and openness. On the other hand, companies ‘just’ doing perfectly reasonable – and valuable – things with the meanings of words, phrases and documents latch on to the Semantic Web’s buzz, whilst being all about Semantics and not at all about the Web.

New entrants, hopefully building viable and useful businesses upon the Semantic Web’s ideas, are pilloried by stalwarts of the ‘community,’ because the reality of their business model does not permit a whole-hearted embracing of the entire Semantic Web stack from Day One. Intellectual purity clashes with pragmatism and reality on a daily basis. Well-meaning guidelines and best practices morph in the minds of too many to become laws, ‘truths’, and rods with which to beat outsiders. Visions of Orwellian pigs fill my brain, and I don’t like what I see as they rise up onto two feet and gaze disdainfully around.

  • Speaking of punching geese, oh look, Ask.com is back. It’s got mad semantic skillz. So I put Ask.com to the test, and asked it “How can I learn more about SPARQL”, and it responded with, “Did you mean, ‘How can I learn more about sparkle’?”. I paused a moment, and said sure, show me that one. Ummm, Swarovski crystal jewelry. Pretty sparkles. To be fair, before following this sparkly tangent, Ask.com did return the first of Bob Ducharme’s post, mentioned above. In fact, it returned exactly the same result list as Google and Yahoo, when I asked them the same question.
  • Though not exactly “this week”, ReadWriteWeb writes a mean semantic web post, now and again, and had one last week subtitled, “Show me the Money!”—and wasn’t that a great movie moment? I digress, though. The RWW post focuses on a new report by a Semantic web entrepreneur on semantic web companies making money, but just at the moment when I clicked through to read the report, I got distracted by the flock of migrating geese overhead. I must pursue the report at a later time. What I found interesting, though, was the ReadWriteWeb Semantic Web Log search and…ah geez, there goes another flock, circling overhead.

There were other sources I searched for information about the semantic web for this week, but the results were less than optimum. For instance, I searched on “semanticweb” in delicious, but the results show the items that were posted to delicious this week, not necessarily published this week. The problem is that while many services such as delicious have a way to tag items with terms like “semanticweb” the metadata annotation is limited, and doesn’t include information such as when was the posted item first published, nor allow you to search on the same. Most of the “semantics” are flat, simple, and two-dimensional, IE keyword-value pairs.

I next went in the opposite direction, looking for just published items, and then sought to filter on the semantic web. For instance, no other source is better for up-to-date discovery of minutiae than Twitter. However, as far as I can see, there is no way to search on specific topic in Twitter. You can look for people, but other subject material search is extremely limited. If you don’t know that Twitter user Kingsley Idehen exists, and posts frequently on semantic web related items, you may not discover a graph of linked data sources or an animation related to RDF as middleware.

I then turned to the Big Cheese, the Head Semantic Web honcho, Twine, and the twine related to the Semantic Web. Eureka! I finded the Semantic Web! Of course, on closer look, most of the items also could be found on Planet RDF. Still, meat that is both fresh, and relevant. I’ll just pick out a few for my version of This Week’s Semantic Web.

  • Seven OWL 2 Drafts Published at the W3C. OWL 2 is an extension of the OWL, which is the Web Ontology Language. No, don’t try to fit the acronym. OWL is not necessarily directly important to thee and me. OWL is important, though, for designing systems that would understand exactly what I mean when I ask, “How can I learn more about SPARQL”, and that will return the definitive sources meeting my question, without being dependent on either language processing or obscure page ranking algorithms.
  • Speaking of SPARQL, another item in the twine was SPARQL Update a submission to the W3C describing a way to use SPARQL to update graphs (semantically linked data stores). Interesting, considering that SPARQL means Simple Protocol and RDF Query Language. What works in one direction must work all directions, eh? Reminds me a little of HTML5 and JSON—the Swiss Army knives of technology.

And so ends my tenure for This Week’s Semantic Web, Burningbird style. What I discovered in the process of building my list was that we’re not close to the semantic web we seek. Without knowing about the people, such as Bob, Kingsley, or Danny, or the topic-focused resources such as Planet RDF or Twine, I would have had a much more difficult time finding out what is happening, this week, in the semantic web. However, among the results I did find are new technologies, new specifications, new efforts that assure us that though the semantic web doesn’t exist today, it surely will someday.

Surely. Someday.

flack of snow geese


update

Brian Manley also accepted Danny’s challenge with This Week in Linked Data.