Categories
Environment People Savannah

International Paper is closing in Savannah. Good.

No community likes to lose jobs, and the 1100 jobs lost with International Paper closing two mills in the Savannah area is going to be painful.

But let’s stop pretending that International Paper has been a good neighbor, because this just isn’t true.

International Paper has been one of the largest industrial users of water in our area, and one of the largest drawing down on the Florida Aquifer. This, at a time when water use is becoming problematic in our community…if the recent boil water order Savannah suffered didn’t properly catch all of our attention.

According to an article in The Current in 2024, IP pulls 12 million gallons of water from the Floridan aquifer every single day. That’s 12 million gallons of water that could go to homes, rather than river water currently being utilized.

Why doesn’t IP use the river water? Because it costs money to treat this water, and why spend the money when the aquifer water is so accessible and so pristine? However, it is the nature of this water that makes it more ideal for human consumption.

“This region is growing,” said Ben Kirsch, legal director of the Ogeechee Riverkeeper. “There’s more people coming in, and those people are going to need water, and it’s a prioritization of how the aquifer is used. The aquifer needs very little treating. It’s pristine water, and we really think that it should be used for human uses, whether that’s for domestic supply or for agriculture.”

 

“We want to sustain the aquifer. We want to see it start to recover, and as you draw millions of gallons a day out of it. You’re not necessarily helping it. That’s not helping it recover.”

In addition, IP manages to also pollute the water it really doesn’t want to use.

International Paper Company faces nearly $28,000 in state fines for discharging wastewater with unacceptable levels of potential fecal material from its Port Wentworth mill into the Savannah River over a six-month period in 2023, according to an order made public by Georgia environmental officials Monday.

 

The penalty also would apply to the unauthorized release in December of nearly 185,000 gallons of partially treated wastewater into a storm drain and ultimately into the river, the Georgia Environmental Protection Division noted in the document.

Not just the water, IP also pollutes the air, as so many of us know when the wind runs from a certain direction.

In 2022, International Paper’s northwest Savannah mill released more than 367,000 metric tons of heat-trapping carbon dioxide, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency data shows. That’s 84% more than the county’s second-leading carbon polluter, the U.S. Sugar Savannah Refinery, and the equivalent of what nearly 83,000 gas-powered vehicles would emit over the course of a year, according to the EPA.

 

Carbon dioxide is the leading contributor to human-caused climate change.

 

International Paper’s Port Wentworth mill is fifth on the county’s list of greenhouse gas polluters. That facility emits more than 95,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide.

 

Combined, the two Chatham plants – with machinery powered by burning natural gas and wood – release the equivalent of carbon emissions generated in more than 1.2 million miles of travel by a typical vehicle with a combustion engine, according to EPA.

An interesting thing about that article I just linked: it’s about a taxpayer bond issue giving IP $130 million dollars to expand the plant.

A deal finalized with local officials this week positions Chatham County’s largest greenhouse gas polluter – and source of the city’s infamous sulfur smell – to significantly increase production at its Savannah-area facilities.

 

The Savannah Economic Development Authority (SEDA) on Tuesday approved issuing $130 million in bonds to “finance the costs of certain machinery, equipment and other personal property” at International Paper Company’s Savannah and Port Wentworth mills.

 

The Chatham County Board of Commissioners signed off on the deal late last year.

Of course, this all happened before IP decided to close down the Savannah-area plants in favor of a new plant in Alabama, where it will likely face less pesky oversight than in Georgia. And I’m sure the local area there offered even better deals than a measly $130 million dollars.

No one wants to hear of people losing jobs. Though it helps to know that unemployment is very low in our area, and we have a robust economy with multiple major employers, it’s difficult for people who have worked for the same company for decades to transition to another employer.

At the same time, though, it’s disingenuous to indulge in maudlin reminisces of the history of a company who basically can’t wait to kick the dirt of coastal Georgia from its shoes. IP likely knew that they would be closing these mills long before the announcement. Not providing more notice to its employees is the mark of a large, soulless corporation, not a small town hero.

Good-bye, good riddance, and now let’s worry about the people.

Update: Savannah Agenda has a good piece on the bond mentioned earlier.

Categories
Government

Georgians: About that email you received from Social Security…

I’m retired, and as such, an important segment of my income comes from Social Security. If you’re a retired US citizen, chances are Social Security is important to you, too.

As a Social Security recipient, I occasionally get emails from the Social Security Administration (SSA) with important information, such as a new benefit letter is available for the coming year, or Social Security tax documents are ready.

I was surprised to receive an email from the Social Security Administration a couple of days ago with the following bold headline

Social Security Applauds Passage of Legislation Providing Historic Tax Relief for Seniors

Evidently, Trump’s administration had decided the best way to obscure the fact that tens of millions of people, including many seniors, are going to lose both healthcare and food assistance is to focus on one component of the bill they claim will be a savior for seniors.

I can assure you, my fellow Georgians: it’s not.

What was included in that monster bill just passed was a provision to provide an additional $6000.00 tax deduction to seniors that will apply only in the years 2025-2028.

Currently, we don’t pay taxes on Social Security if our incomes fall below $25,000 for an individual and $32,000 for a couple. Roughly 50 percent of Social Security recipients have income less than these upper limits and don’t pay income tax. In fact, many people don’t even have to file with the IRS annually because their income is too low.

Taxation on Social Security is relatively new (passed in legislation in 1984) and came about as a way to bolster dwindling Social Security and Medical trust funds. All of the money that comes from taxing Social Security income goes directly to these trust funds.

By increasing the standard deduction for seniors, Congressional Republicans have provided some additional income for middle and higher-income Social Security recipients, and will increase the numbers that don’t have to pay taxes. However, the amount seniors receive is relatively negligible.

According to the Tax Foundation, if all taxes for Social Security were eliminated, those in the 60-80% income percentiles would receive an additional 0.9 percent in income. With the increased deduction, these folks will  receive an additional 0.3 percent. The White House touts number of people who won’t have to pay any income tax, but most of these folks have to pay very little anyway. As the Tax Foundation notes:

Overall, the increased senior deduction with the phaseout would deliver a larger tax cut to lower-middle- and middle-income taxpayers compared to exempting all Social Security benefits from income taxation and would not weaken the trust funds as much. But given the temporary nature of the policy, it would increase the deficit-impact of the reconciliation bills without boosting long-run economic growth.

Both the additional amount seniors will receive and the temporary nature of the deduction combine to negate any lasting positive impact of the new deduction. However, there is a lasting negative impact on the Social Security and Medicare trust funds.

According to a report in Fox Business:

The nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) estimated that the One Big Beautiful Bill Act’s tax policy changes would result in those depletion dates moving up from early 2033 to late 2032 for Social Security’s Old-Age and Survivors Insurance trust fund and from late 2033 to mid-2032 for Medicare’s Hospital Insurance trust fund.

The deduction for seniors is nothing but smoke and mirrors, but it’s smoke and mirrors that actually increases the vulnerability of seniors in the long run.

Tax Foundation: How Would the Proposed Additional Senior Deduction Compare to No Tax on Social Security?

Fox Business: Experts warn Senate tax bill accelerates Medicare and Social Security insolvency dates

Categories
Government Political

Dear Buddy – No Kings edition

Dear Buddy,

Long time, no see. Since I last touched base with you, democracy was kidnapped off the street, put in handcuffs, and hauled off by both National Guard and Marines. Lawyers are frantically working to ensure it doesn’t get shipped off to El Salvador, or some place with an active volcano.

The people rose up across the country and all 50 states—yes, even the Republican ones—in protest at democracy’s treatment. Why people even showed up in your district, which is kind of ironic, considering you never do.

Why all of the protests?

You see, we’re used to the National Guard showing up when our homes flood or get burned down to the ground, and we’re vulnerable and scared, and they look like saviors sent from on high to help us try to return to normalcy. They find us in the debris and they rescue us from rivers and bring us food and water and comfort.

We’re not used to seeing National Guard surround a bevy of masked government agents in street clothes, themselves surrounding a single frightened man, or young child screaming in terror.

Of course, the National Guard troops aren’t used to it, either. They’re used to being welcomed with open arms—and pizza—not cold stares and terrified tears. I have a suspicion they don’t like it and may rethink their membership in the Guard because of it.

As for the Marines, well…the photo of a US citizen being detained by Marines looks familiar. Didn’t I see the same thing in photos in Pravda? I’m sure it must have been some Russian newspaper or another, because I know I’ve certainly never seen anything like that here, in the United States.

Active duty soldiers being turned loose on the people in this country. The idea is so outlandish, I’m sure it will become the plot of some book or movie. Probably one that doesn’t have a happy ending.

Before I continue with improbable movie plots,  I did hear you’re running to be Senator of our state. I find this a little odd, though. I mean, if you find it so hard to meet with people in your smaller  Congressional district, how are you going to meet with the people of the entire state? And I don’t think showing up at luncheons for Republican women really counts, do you?

But I digress…this isn’t about your political chances, or thoughts of hell freezing over. This is about democracy. The small ‘d’ kind. The kind that once upon a time, it seemed both parties supported. Oh, the parties had differences of opinions on exactly what the support entailed, but I’m pretty sure that activating 4000 National Guard and 700 Marines because of a couple of hundred protestors was not on anyone’s Bingo card.

What happened to you, Buddy, so that you’d turn a blind eye to all of this? Are you so lost in reaching for political power that you forgot that with great power comes great responsibility?

Oh darn, now I know that last line was from some book or movie, but I don’t care, because it’s true: power must be tempered by responsibility.

The power of a leader is not in how much money they get, or how many tanks they can roll down the street; it’s not measured in numbers of federal employees fired, or scared hardworking immigrants sent to torture chamber in another country; it’s certainly not measured in how many American people can be cowered or suppressed. The power of a leader is how much of a force for good they are for the people as a whole. Not just some people, not just rich people, not just people of one race and religion, and not just people who belong to a certain party.

To all of us.

Buddy, I want you to listen carefully to what I say, because it’s more important than introducing bills to create a committee of 13 people whose sole purpose is to investigate the mental health of a man who is no longer President.

The true power of a leader is directly proportional to the people’s own power over that leader. A truly great leader is a servant, not a king.

 

Categories
Burningbird Just Shelley

The Eye Has It

I had planned on doing a piece on Buddy Carter’s pharma self-dealing, and a host of other writing, but personal health issues got in the way.

I have a macular hole, which is a hole in the center of your eye; the part that provides fine focus.

Before they could operate on the macular hole, they had to remove cataracts from both eyes: the right so I could see after the vitrectomy for the macular hole, the left so the surgeon could see while he works.

I don’t want to go into details on the vitrectomy. I don’t want you all to go, “Ooogie!” You can look it up if you’re really curious.

I had the vitrectomy a week ago, under general anesthetic as an outpatient at Memorial Hospital. I have a skilled vitreoretinal surgeon and the hospital staff was really very competent and helpful.

But now I’m existing with a gas bubble in the eye, to help the results of the surgery heal. It is tiring and writing isn’t high on my list of “To do” right now. Thank goodness I found a macular hole/vitrectomy community on Facebook, so I can get advice from people who have been through this quite rare experience (about 8 in 100,000 people get macular holes, 2/3 of whom are women).

So, I will be back, soon, because we’re in the fight of our lives and all hands on deck now.

Categories
Government People

Dear Buddy Carter: Do you believe in the rule of law?

Buddy, I have a question for you:

Do you believe in the rule of law?

I ask this question because we elected you to Congress to be our representative among Congressional lawmakers. That’s what Congress is, you know: lawmakers.

Yet in the few months since Trump has been in office, he and his cohort have been breaking existing laws to a degree never before seen in our country.

He has grabbed people off the street and sent them to a prison known for its enslavement and torture. He has cancelled grants to universities solely because they won’t let him control every last aspect of their operation. He has terminated student visas because they have written opinion pieces in newspapers he doesn’t like.

Trump has turned the Department of Justice into a revenge machine, telling it to open investigations on people who have done nothing more than deny his lie that he won the election in 2020.

He has sent people into agencies and they have openly broken security laws, including grabbing data they have no need for or legal reason to have. And when someone has exposed this behavior to you, in Congress, his life was threatened.

If a law firm has defended someone Trump doesn’t like, he has threatened them with dire consequences if they don’t adhere to his demands, all of which blatantly violate the Constitution.

He has gone after universities and threatened them—threatened them!— if the universities don’t give up their freedom of speech, and their own ability to govern themselves. And when Harvard bravely said no, all grants to the university were pulled—even though these grants were for research that help us live better and longer.

Trump has frozen funds that the country has guaranteed, both to agencies overseas and to our own domestic organizations and states. Funds that are necessary for medical care and medical research; to monitor storms and recover from them; to help communities better prepare for storms and other catastrophes; to help schools better serve their students and ensure all of the students are fed and educated equally; to support small businesses and farmers; to help the hungry, the sick, and those harmed by circumstances beyond their control.

Funds that you, in Congress, allocated and control. Supposedly control.

He openly and laughingly mocks our judicial system, and I include the Supreme Court in this, though this higher court’s timid responses to Trump’s outrageous acts have not shown it in at its best. But even when they finally pushed back, ever so slightly, he laughed at it. Not only laughed at it, he was joined by one of South America’s most brutal dictators in that laughter. His new best friend.

Now, he threatens to not only send migrants to a brutal life in another country, he threatens to send citizens, too. And we already know he’ll do so without giving anyone the benefit of legal representation in a court of law.

He’ll just send armed thugs into the street, dressed in plain clothes and wearing hoods and driving in black SUVs to grab people off the street and put them on a plane and then hold up his hands and go, “Oopsie! Made a mistake! Well, can’t do anything about it now, they’re in foreign control!”

We were warned that we were approaching a Constitutional crises, when the President of the United States held himself above the laws of the land. We waited in hope, and some fear, to see what he would do when courts intervened.

We now know what he’ll do: disobey the courts. We are no longer approaching a Constitutional crises, we’re in one, and we now wonder if, at the end of four years, will we even have a country left? Will we even be allowed to vote for who we want? Or will we receive notes pasted on our doors, threatening us if we don’t do as Trump asks?

And in all of this—all of it!—not one peep from you. Not one mild expression of concern. Not even a single, “well, we might want to reconsider this.” No, all you have done is appear on radically right newscasts as a way of pretending you don’t need a Town Hall, and then spent the time praising Trump.

So I ask you now, do you believe in the rule of law? You are our elected representative to Congress, to the body of lawmakers that have kept our country free, safe, and secure for 250 years. And as a lawmaker, isn’t it your sworn duty to ensure that laws are kept and not broken? Or is your allegiance to Trump so strong that you don’t care about the laws, or the harm that will come to the people in your district because these laws are broken? All that matters to you is Trump?

It’s a simple question, Buddy: Do you believe in the rule of law?

Sources

Who is Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the man ICE mistakenly deported to an El Salvador prison?

Trump officials cut billions in Harvard funds after university defies demands

How the Education Department cuts could hurt low-income and rural schools

Trump directs DOJ to investigate former administration officials who criticized him

USDA cancels $1 billion in funding for schools and food banks to buy food from local suppliers

FEMA cuts $30 million grant earmarked to improve flooding, drainage issues in Savannah

Public libraries in Georgia brace for federal cuts

Academic medical centers say funding cuts jeopardize health research

A whistleblower’s disclosure details how DOGE may have taken sensitive labor data

Video shows Tufts graduate student grabbed off the street by federal immigration officials

Core Democratic groups are preparing to be targeted by the Trump administration

The Trump administration’s defiance is proving Justice Sotomayor’s point

Lawrence on Trump attacking the rule of law: We are all Harvard. We are all Abrego Garcia.

Buddy Carter is Georgia’s First Congressional District Representative