Categories
Weblogging

Global PR

Jeneane Sessum has a very impressive article on CEOs weblogging: pros and cons. Though not a CEO, I heard the following:

Because blogging is a continuously evolving medium, it is unpredictable. The risks of blogging—of being harassed in comments, embarrassed by errors and miscommunication, even being fired—have been well demonstrated in real-life scenarios for a few years now.

Then there’s the other risks, left to the imagination of the reader.

Congrats, Jeneane. I’d say that if folks are looking for women to speak at social software and related conferences, you would be an exceptionally good choice.

Categories
Social Media Weblogging

Google’s Blog search

Recovered from the Wayback Machine.

Oh, yes. That’s what we needed: another one of these. I searched on Missouri and then had to wade through pages of real estate ads. From the review, I gather it searches blogs based on those pinging the ‘popular’ ping servers. The same servers that bring every comment spammer in the biz sniffing around your place. So I can ping weblogs.com or blo.gs, get hundreds of new comment spam; in order to show up in Google Blog Search, and thereby attracting even more hundreds of comment, referrer, and trackback-attempt spam. Oh, yes. Just what we needed.

Boring. Boring, boring, boring. If these hotshot companies would hire more women engineers, we might actually see something different, something new rather than the same old, same old with a new package and a godlike name attached: Google Blog Search. But don’t let this stop you middle aged white boys from jumping up and down, y’hear?

Categories
Social Media Weblogging

Define Noise

This is a test as well as a story. Scoble is very excited about a new service, Memeorandum, that ‘floats’ most linked stories to the top in two specific categories: technology and politics/current affairs. Contrary to some others who have been critical of the UI, I found it clean and relatively simple to comprehend.

I would tend to think of the service as something similar to Daytop 40 or Blogdex, but highlighted by topic and with a few more goodies, such as links to the other search services. Cool enough, except that Robert mentioned a couple of things in his post that got my attention:

… he doesn’t look at all of the blogs in the world (unless you hit preferences and start using the blog search services he’s linked in). Huh? How cool can that be if it doesn’t include your Uncle Joe who wrote code one time back in college?

It’s very cool, because it has very low noise. In fact, I’ve been visiting this 10 to 50 times a day for the last few months and I’ve never seen something that I would call noise or spam.

Define ‘noise’, Robert? Anyone that doesn’t rank? This does lead to an interesting new definition for the semantic web: a web of means, rather than a web of meaning.

According to Gabe, the site developer and architect, the goals are memeorandum are:

1. Recognize the web as editor: There’s this notion that blogs collectively function as news editor. No, not every last blog on Earth. Tapping the thoughts of all of humanity uniformly would predictably lead to trivial, even spammy “news”. But today there are rather large communities of knowledgeable, sophisticated commentators, (and yes) even reporters writing on the web, signaling in real time what’s worthy of wider discussion. I want memeorandum to tap this signal.

2. Rapidly uncover new sources: Sometimes breaking news is posted to a blog created just to relate that news. Sometimes the author of the most insightful analysis piece at 2PM was a relative unknown at 1PM. It happens. I want memeorandum to highlight such work, without delay.

3. Relate the conversation: Communication on the web naturally tends toward conversation. It follows from human nature plus the Internet’s immediacy. Blog posts react to news articles, essays reference editorials. And links abound. Yet most news sites do very little to relate the form of conversations unfolding in real time. Some seem to deny that a conversation is even occurring. I want memeorandum to be a clear exception.

This confirms that only certain weblogs are canvassed for links. In Robert’s post, I asked Gabe to provide a listing of the weblogs he canvasses for both politics and technology.

We’ll see if this shows up in the service. If not, either I don’t rank, or if I do, I don’t rank as a technology blog. Stay tuned…

I did show up, quite quickly. I feel all red carpety and gold starred. I also showed up, as quickly though, in the IceRocket list for Scoble’s link. Another question I had for Gabe was if he originally pulls lead stories from the canvassed weblogs, and then uses the search engines to pull additional links as they come available.

I also wonder if his bot is the one that signs itself “Mmm…. Brains….”

Categories
Weblogging

Get your Bozo on

Yes! Thank you! I needed this.

The BetterBadNews folk take on Tim O’Reilly, Foo Camp, ranking, as well as making a case for getting your Bozo on. Why? Because being a bozo is where it’s at.

Case in point: Lone wolfs are cool. If you’re a true lone wolf, you don’t care about ranking schemes. Not caring about ranking schemes makes you a bozo within this market driven environment. Hence, being a lone wolf is synonymous with being a bozo. Therefore, you can’t be cool unless you’re a bozo.

Favorite quote:

When I get my Bozo on, I like to agree with the biggest idiot in the room. For no good reason. And then miss the point of the discussion. And then ask a question that has nothing to do with the topic. Is this so wrong?

We need a “What kind of bozo are you” quiz. We could even rank each other within a Bozo ranking system, except that I already ‘own’ bozo. You can ‘own’ bozo, too. All you have to do is not care.

Note that the BBN did make a complimentary comment about my incessant squawking about the uselessness of ranking systems. But even if they had dissed me, I would still point to them — I love their use of satire. And if we can’t laugh at ourselves, then we really are bozos. Not that I’m pointing out any particular bozo when making this statement…

(Thanks to Yule for sending me a heads-up on the broadcast.)

Categories
Weblogging

Stopping the world

AKMA wrote a post about the ongoing political discussions surrounding the effects of Katrina and the government’s response. He wrote:

“This is no time for politics,” people say, and to the extent that some of us might be about more immediately useful work, they may be right — but one useful end that some of us can serve is to point out that the past five years the U.S. government has operated in explicit repudiation of reality-based politics, and the chickens are coming home (or “homeless”) to roost.

I can understand what AKMA is saying, particularly since I can agree with him and so many others who have been critical: of Bush, of the National Guard, of FEMA, the local government in Louisiana and so on. Normally I would be in the midst of the discussion.

However, I’m finding that the contention and anger surrounding this event is becoming increasingly difficult to absorb. I can’t seem to maintain enough detachment to keep from being pulled completely in, and by the end of the day, I’m feeling emotionally drained and physically sick. Some of this is coming from the worries, frustrations, and the sense of loss–of people, of history–because of Katrina. But not all.

Debate should energize, not drain. When it doesn’t, you need to step away. When I read the headline, Condi returns to DC after Bloggers expose vacation about how wrong it was for Rice to buy expensive shoes while people are suffering in New Orleans, it was enough. And I find I don’t have the words to explain why.

While I’m taking a breather, some folks with good thoughts:

Joseph Duemer: Small Town Accountability

Jeneane Sessum: President Bush Declares War on Weather

Dave Rogers: What can I say and Unbelievable

question and answer that Dave Winer had about the future impact of Katrina–beyond the South. In particular, check out the comments associated with the question.

Loren Webster: Two Worlds Apart

Frank Paynter: Down on our Luck

Scott Reynen: Fear Kills

Sheila Lennon provides a continuously updated round of news.

Norm Jenson: Incompetence

Charles Eicher: Outrage Overload

Karl: We would have fought or died

Lauren points to Culture of Life

There are others, but this is a good start.

I also want to thank Danny for Sassi and Doc Searls for telling me what the two bright lights in the sky were.