Categories
Political

Political Games

Recovered from the Wayback Machine.

With the American election getting ever closer, the political games will continue to increase. If we’ve managed to stumble about in naiveté for the last three years, now is the time to wake up, and smell the cynicism.

There have been a number of folk who have tried to generate discord in the “Anyone but Bush” solid front by questioning whether Kerry would be a good President. They say, what are the positive things about Kerry that would make him a good leader? After all, can’t elect a man just because he’s not George Bush, can we?

The hope is that they’ll pull the more liberal or seemingly liberal of us about and get us thinking that, why of course we shouldn’t vote for someone just because they’re not someone else. They pro-Bush camp is joined by Ralph Nader and his supporters in this effort to drain off just enough of the votes from Kerry to put Bush back into the White House, while giving Nader the ego boost he seems to desperately need.

What the parties involved forget is that for many elections, people vote for the best of a lot we don’t generally care for, making a determination that we’d rather have someone who is inactively good, than actively bad.

I am voting for Kerry and Edwards because, first of all, they are not Bush and Cheney. Even if Kerry spent the next four years, comatose at his desk and didn’t do a damn thing, he would be a better President than George W. Bush in the White House for four more years without the constraints of worrying about a future re-election. An unconstrained Bush is the stuff of nightmares. (Puerile humorous pun unintended.)

If Kerry just sat in his chair, contemplating his navel, he wouldn’t be attempting to work around the decisive support for ANWR (Alaska National Wildlife Reserve) by opening up the rest of the Arctic for devastating damage via oil drilling infrastructure (thanks Julie.)

If Kerry spent the time playing Solitaire, at least he wouldn’t be invading other countries on shallow pretexts, and then find a handy scape goat when things don’t go according to a badly thought out plan. Or inviting in big time financial supporters to change the course of the environmental and energy policies in this country, until such time as the supporter gets busted.

If Kerry and Edwards spend all their time traveling the country, appearing in nightclubs as a singing act called “The Breckettes”, hopefully they would fire that incompetent Ridge first, with his deliberate manufacturing of fear through vague and unspecified threats; not to mention thoughts of bloodless coups. Then some kid who happens to be the wrong skin color can go back to finishing his photo assignments without being arrested.

(By the way, I didn’t mention this earlier, but half of my photographs that will be appearing in the August issue of Missouri Life were of bridges. I figure this should help sales–all those brown skinned terrorists in this country, you know.)

No, if Kerry spent most of his time finger-painting on the walls of the Oval Office using ketchup, he at least wouldn’t be harrassing gays in order gain a few extra votes from those who like nothing better than to interfere in the lives of others. In the name of God, of course. Don at Hands in the Dirt had it right:

This was about election political posturing at the expense of a minority segment of the population.

And since Kerry is under threat from being denied religious comfort for being a leader to the people rather than a good Catholic, perhaps the righteous religious in this country will have to go back to practicing their religion, all that golden rule stuff, rather than trying to force the rest of us into their beliefs.

(Oh, and for those critical of Edwards and Kerry for not being present for this vote, be aware that the members of Congress almost always know how a vote will go before it happens. A favorite election year gambit is to use this knowledge ahead of time to make those who are running for office seem negligent when they aren’t available for a vote. Members of a party will actually change their vote on a measure to make the vote seem much closer than it would really be, just to generate bad publicity for a candidate. Yeah, I know: devious. And both parties are guilty of it. So take the cries of, “But they didn’t vote” with a grain of salty sand.)

No, I reckon a dead Kerry is worth more than a live Bush in office. After all, we thought a dead man was worth more than Ashcroft when he ran for Congress in Missouri.

But having said this, I think a live Kerry will do a lot of good. I think he’ll put back many, if not all, of the environmental protections we’ve lost over the last three years. I also think he’ll reduce the office of Homeland Security to it’s proper role, and roll back many of the paranoid acts that have been foolishly passed. Contrary to unfounded implications, I expect that he’ll be a strong leader in case of conflict, if needed; but I also don’t think he’ll go looking for a fight.

He knows that healthcare is an issue, needing more effective legislation than that foolish Medicare drug reform that just so happens to benefit yet more Bush supporters. He also knows that we’ve botched our handling of the military needs for the Mideast and will hopefully stop punishing the same military by yanking them about with little regard and even less pay.

He’ll make tough choices – like eliminating some of those tax cuts. Mario Cuomo did a brilliant TV interview this weekend saying that only the top 2% of the country really benefits from the tax cuts. The problem, he said, is that the top 20% of income earners think they’re in the top 2% income bracket. So about 18% of the people think they’ll benefit from tax cuts, when in reality the benefit is negligible.

Most of all, I think both Kerry and Edwards will listen to others, and be prepared to change their minds when new facts arise. Some people call this flip-flopping; I call this learning from experience, and being willing to admit you made a mistake.

Categories
Media

If only I weren’t lost in translation

Though I couldn’t take pictures of the storm when I was looking at it from the parking lot last Monday, I did try to take some photos of it when I got home. However, when I started to take the pictures, my camera began emitting this high pitched whistle, just like the sound things make in the movies before they explode in a loud and dangerous manner.

Rather than tossing the camera through the air and diving into a ditch, I whipped off the battery cover and removed the battery. Not as dramatic, but not as hard on the camera. What caused the noise, I don’t know, but I hesitate to put that one battery back in.

The editor of Missouri Life is sending me a copy of the magazine featuring my photos and also arranging payment to me – payment! money! – and this forms the start for my new camera fund. I am going to buy a Nikon D70 because a) I like Nikon optics and quality; and b) I have several lens that will work with the D70. In the meantime, words will do until I have my new camera or feel brave enough to put the battery back into my old one.

However, it may be a time before I have the new camera because I have become very frugal of late, cutting our fripperies right and left in esthetic abandon. I am indulging in just one splurge–a monthly subscription to Netflix. Thanks to it, I’ve managed to finally see Big Fish, Lost in Translation, Seabiscuit and several other less than memorable films. That and my library, my computer and the Internet, a small drive in the car and a long hike, and above all, my whistling camera, and I am content.

I thought that Seabiscuit was charming, but a little predictable. I really liked Big Fish – I loved the tall tales and the actors and the narrative and the end, and thought it was a very good film. But Lost in Translation, now that was a fine movie. Since I am probably the last person to have seen it, nothing I can say about the movie should be spoiler, but be forewarned.

People have said the movie was about these two strangers who find each other, and not about them being in Japan, but I have to disagree: Japan forms a third character, the straight man the other actors play against.

The premise behind the movie is two people alienated from their surroundings who happen to find each other. Not only are they alienated in the environment in which they find themselves in Japan – a country with a different culture and language– we learn over time they are also alienated from those who love them: the young woman can’t connect with her husband and his hollywood lifestyle; the aging actor looks at spilled color samples, trying to understand which is burgundy among all the pinks.

If the movie had taken place on a beach in Oregon or some such thing, all we would have seen was two dissatisfied people who can’t seem to find contentment with their very good lives. Instead, by putting this movie in Japan, the lack of connection both experience originates first from an external source; an impression lasting long enough, and being familiar enough, for the audience to get to know and even like both of the main characters. Rather than two spoiled people who refuse to be content with their lives, we meet two people who are lost, lonely even in the midst of friends and family and admirers, and the bright neon lights.

I’ve heard people condemn the movie for stereotyping, but the impressions I received of people in Japan from this movie are that they are gracious, charming, friendly, patient, and have wonderful senses of humor. I wouldn’t mind it if people stereotyped Americans that way.

No, rather than crude stereotyping, what we’re given is a look at Bob and Charlotte’s perceptions of their surroundings. What we see through their eyes is what they expected to see, and what astonished them to see. The ordinary is invisible.

There were so many scenes I loved in Lost In Translation. I loved the scene with the prostitute and the nylons, and thought I would choke I was laughing so hard. I also enjoyed the hospital scene with the two ladies laughing politely behind their hands in the background at Bob’s non-conversation with the older Japanese person; or when Charlotte was exploring and Bob was riding in the Taxi through the streets – and the quiet elegance found within these visually exploding scenes.

In the end, when Bob runs up to Charlotte and they hold each other and he whispers something in her ear, and we don’t know what it is–what a perfect ending. What a marvelous ending. I would save all my pennies to go to Japan if only I could have a moment, one single moment of that ending.

I was thinking about this movie last week when I sat in the dark looking out the window at the storm, too late in an evening or too early in a morning. I found myself wondering: if I were feeling lost and alienated, what words would I want to hear whispered in my ear?

I also thought that I would rather be lost in translation than lost in Hoboken, New Jersey. And if I were lost in Hoboken, New Jersey, I wondered if I could find a way to blame it on the Japanese.

Categories
Diversity

No room at the top

I have been remiss in the past in all my criticisms of Six Apart’s business practices and Movable Type coding gotchas. One thing I did not comment on favorably was the fact that Mena Trott was CEO of the company. In our environment where it’s rare to hear a woman’s name in a list of speakers, or see a woman’s face among a photograph of leaders in any field, Mena stood out as an example to all women that this environment is not completely and totally controlled by men.

Well, that was, until today when Mena wrote a very gracious note about a gentleman by the name of Barak Berkowitz who has taken over as CEO of Six Apart. I’m not sure of what Mena’s position is at this point; I believe she may be continuing on as President.

Six Apart is no longer Ben and Mena Trott, not with all the VC involvement and international growth. It is a very successful company now, and nothing wrong with success in weblogging. I guess an added benefit is that whatever criticism any of us now have of the company or products, I don’t think people will say we’re kicking the baby squirrels because of it.

But it was difficult reading about Mena stepping down as CEO because I have to wonder how much of our criticism of the recent license fees had to do with it. I work hard to see that women are promoted in weblogging, only to be critical of a company headed by one of the few women who has managed to find a position among all those cookie cutter men. Yet, paradoxically, I don’t believe that criticism should be held back just because the recipient is one of the few women that has actually made a difference.

In all my discussions about women in weblogging and technology, I’ve not asked that women get preferential treatment, or to be judged other than on our own merits. If anything I’ve asked that women get the equivalent acknowledgement and recognition, and yes, even criticism, that men get. Still, I wonder–by being critical of these rare women, do we make it easier to get pulled from, or should I say pushed from, positions that are hard for us to get to in the first place?

I hope this is a good move for Mena Trott. I wish her success in whatever role she has in the company. I am happy for her, but sad for us: there’s now one less woman at the top.

Categories
Just Shelley

If only parents weren’t so real

If only I had brought the camera – I could have shown you such pictures of last Monday’s storm. The clouds were furious, angry, as if annoyed at having to push against the front facing them. Yet here and there among the clouds, a break would occur and the sun shine through.

At one time I was hit with winds so hard, they knocked me back and the air was cold, even in the middle of a hot, humid day. The sky took on a green cast and I knew that a tornado would form eventually from it, and it did, but on the other side of St. Louis. For me though, it was looking up at the sky as it pushed and pulsed down towards me directly over my head. At that moment, was the closest I’ve come to wanting to believe in God.

Eventually the might of the storm was past, and as I headed back to my car, the other storm watcher in the truck was leaving, stopping first to call out, “Hell of a storm, isn’t it?” I could only agree, both of us smiling like the damn fools we were to sit there in what could be the path of a forming tornodo. You had to be there, though.

I drove home directly back into the storm, amid constant lightning that made it difficult to focus on the driving, because of the incredible crashing sound and the bright glares of light in front and to the sides.

When I got home, I stood at the back door just looking at the sky and the constant lightning. When it turned 9, and my cellphone reached its ‘free minutes’, I called my Mom to share with her the half-formed funnels and the cool fronts, the blow by blow retelling of the story. Does this seem a child-like thing to do? To call one’s mother to share a storm?. She already knew about it anyway, having checked out the weather channel. We both like a good storm.

I call my mother once a week now, or more often when something interesting or special happens. This is contrary to today’s seeming fashion to blame one’s mother or father for whatever demons the person may be battling. Or the converse: making our parents into some form of super heros, as if by having us is comparable to fighting off tigers, inventing cold fusion, or creating world peace.

Some parents are heros, but not because they became parents. And for others whose parents or guardians were anti-heros–who beat or abused or abandoned–the demons are very real.

For many years I nourished a great deal of anger at my mother for events in the past, while making my father into the Man who could do no Wrong. When my Mom would say, “You’re a lot like me”, I’d reject this statement, being nothing like her. I would tell her I found more of my father in me than her, which was a hurtful thing to say.

And I did learn much from my father: honor and responsibility, not to mention inheriting from him my good Irish temper.

As for my mother – the last of the beatniks, the free spirits; the woman who left my father when I was young, and who left I and my brother to the care of dubious caregivers, well, for years I would keep in rare contact with her; a call here, or a letter there. I used to tell my ex-husband the reason I moved so much was so my mother wouldn’t be tempted to move where we were.

But anger unfaced and unresolved is a jail of our own making, and one can’t go through life carrying our parents about like wardens holding the keys to our happiness. I know someone who talks about his narcissic mother, again and again, and all I can think of is: at what time in his life is he going to stop punishing her in his mind, and go on with his life? Or is that the point– not facing life? Sometimes we carry our ‘bad’ parents about as shields as much as iron bars.

I’ve been particularly depressed these last few years, as I watched my glory days fade out about as quickly as the unreal dot-com profits. I’ve even tried an anti-depressant, which only made me very sick; though before I broke out in hives, the medication did clear my depression. However, it also cured much in me that I use in my writing and photography. Remove the bitter from bittersweet and all that I have left is bunnies and kittens and feeling good. Medication works for some, but not all; the rest of us have to find another way to confront our ‘demons’.

Not that I hadn’t tried, especially the demons arising from my mother. In September in 2002 I made the trip back west to confront her over the past, but rather than be cathartic, the event just left me more tired, and dissatisfied. My mother was guilty of the worst form of neglect and I was justified in being angry with her. At the same time, though, I love her, and secretly have to agree with her–I am like her a great deal. Does this, then, make me the monster that I remember from my youth?

It was only after a trip to my brother’s earlier this year, to watch my father while my brother was on Spring break that I came to understand my mother better. My father talked about one time when he had to take my brother and I along with him in the patrol car to an accident, and my brother released the brake on the car and it ended up crashing down a hill– a favorite story. He ended the story as he always did, laughing about telling my Mom that she couldn’t take piano lessons again. That she had to stay home, and take care of us.

He’d told that story a dozen times. Why was this the first time I heard what he had to say?

That started a series of calls to my mother– every weekend. This time not in anger, but in genuine curiousity. I wanted to know more about the woman that was my mother before she was Mom. And the man who is Dad.

She told me that she and her brother were told they’d have to leave home as soon as they were finished with high school–they were no longer welcome. I started to tell her, I wasn’t surprised remembering my grandmother, Atilla the Grandmum. But it wasn’t my grandmother who said they’d have to leave: it was my sweet, quiet grandfather. According to Mom, grandma tried to get my grandpa to reconsider and let them stay.

This shook my world with my memories of my grandmother and her sharp remonstrations on my behavior; all the while I would be spending quiet times walking the orchard with my grandfather while he would cut slices of peach for me with his pocket knife. But then unbidden comes to mind my grandmother’s care when I had the chicken pox; or the time when we women, well we women and one little girl, were canning corn and my grandmother exclaiming, “Lands sake, child! You’re going to be taller than your father someday! And prettier than your mother!”

(Towards the end of her life she would ask about me, but I wouldn’t visit. I didn’t even go to her funeral.)

But back to my Mom. My mother ended up living with her grandmother after she left high school–a woman who was very strict and religious. This was not easy on my mother, who was very outgoing and vivacious and popular with boys and girls alike.

She worked as a waitress in a roadside cafe where she met my Dad, a cop. He was a good looking guy, secure financially, and smitten with Mom, who was a couple of decades younger than he. They married, immediately had my brother, and then, not long after, had me.

We lived on a farm miles outside of town, and my Dad was gone on duty most of the time; leaving behind a young, talented, restless wife who never did have much chance or choice in what she did with her life. There was also a lot of younger good looking guys around who were more than willing to step in and fill in gaps in Mom’s life, though my Mom never cheated on my father. No, she just eventually kicked him out and divorced him. And then she went to town.

My Mom made mistakes during that time, some pretty serious ones. Some folks might even consider some of them unforgivable. I know I did. So unforgivable that I brought them out, again and again, polishing them with recollection until they were worn round and shiny, and wore them around my neck like some kind of fancy pearl necklace.

And I made a martyr out of my Dad – a true hero. After all, he didn’t want to go, and never re-married. He loved my Mother still, and loved us, too. He was always there for us–well, when he wasn’t on duty, but can’t fault a man for not being there when duty calls.

Yet, years later, I can finally see that my Dad made mistakes, too. It’s just his were not as obvious, or as immediate. I guess what I found over that series of calls is that my parents are neither saints nor sinners.

My brother won’t talk to my mother. He’s still angry at her. She won’t visit him and the kids because she’s afraid of flying, and she doesn’t act the proper grandmother role. Of course, he won’t talk to me now, too, because I failed as aunt in my last trip. Rather than nurture my 18 year old nephew, I, among other things, called him a lazy SOB when my 93 year old father carried up a sink worth of dirty dishes from my nephew’s room. My Dad got upset because I yelled at my nephew. He said, that’s what I’m supposed to do–care for the kids. Daughter to one, sister to another, aunt to even a third.

No. No. I think not.

It’s good to spend time with our parents, and find who they are as people. For me, it’s too late to have long talks with my Dad, though. He’s old, very old, and confused much of the time. I give him the love and respect he deserves, and that’s enough; I even lie when I write him now and tell him I have a wonderful job, so he doesn’t worry about me being a writer.

And now, at 49, I have found that I like my mother. I really like my mother. We have become good friends. If only we had talked sooner, we may have reached this place sooner. But then, neither of us was ready for this talk, long ago.

I was chatting with her this weekend about this and that, including the recent discussions about weblogging and women, and I mentioned something about having my Dad’s poor eyesight, as well as his height and temper. Mom said that I had some of her, too, and I replied, yes, I had her beautiful green eyes and a little of her artistic skills. She said more than that – I was a lot like her, in personality.

I giggled and said, “You mean flaky, odd, and annoying to men?”

She responded back with, “Well, I was going to say ‘different’. You’ve never been afraid of being different.”

She paused, undecided whether to be affronted or tickled, and said. “Well, flaky will work, too.” And at that we both broke out in laughter.

I guess I and my Mom are more alike than not: we both have the same laugh.

TO BE CONTINUED…

Categories
Technology Weblogging

Talkback as plugin

In my last post on WordPress, Carthik asked about my “Talkback” implementation. I hadn’t included this as part of my WordPress modifications because I’ve had the beastie since Movable Type times and didn’t think of it as a WordPress mod. However, I’ve since converted it into a WordPress plugin; you can access the text of the plugin here. Just copy this into wp-content/plugins/, rename it talkback.php, activate it and you’re good to go.

This particular plugin incorporates my fulltext implementation, so the code does need to be modified if you’re not using this. Look for the comment in the code that begins with “// if you don’t implement multi-page fulltext…” and follow the instructions accordingly.

To invoke the plugin, in a separate page, which I’ve called speakback.php, include the wp-blog-header.php in the beginning of the page, and then just call the function:

talkback();

Formatting is already included in the output.

The simplest approach would be to copy index.php, remove the guts of the main body, and replace it with this function call.

Then in your comments, call the page like so:

Talkback: <a href=”/speakback.php?name=<?php comment_author() ?>”>By name</a> <a href=”/speakback.php?url=<?php comment_author_url() ?>”>By URL</a>

Clicking on the name or URL will then bring up a page of the person’s comments at your site.