Categories
Just Shelley

Eye into the Universe

Recovered from the Wayback Machine.

Hubble Space StationNamed after the American astronomer Edwin Hubble, the Hubble telescope was conceived as a way to put a telescope into space outside of the vision-impairing atmosphere that surrounds our planet. By doing this, we can see more and learn more about the universe that surrounds us.

Hubble was not the first astronomical effort in space: that honor belongs to two Orbital Astronomical Observatories launched into space in 1968 and 1972. Because of these earlier efforts, support for a space-based telescope grew and NASA, in 1975, began the design of what was to become known as the Hubble Space Telescope.

Several groups and companies were involved with the building of Hubble, including NASA, the European Space Agency, the Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama — home of Space Camp — as well as the companies that actually built Hubble: Perkin-Elmer Corporation and Lockheed Missile and Space Company. Perkin-Elmer built the optical and guidance systems, while Lockheed built the outer shell of the telescope. The European Space Agency furnished the solar arrays and one of the scientific instruments; the other instruments were furnished by major universities.

Shuttle Discovery

According to NASA’s History of Hubble, it was launched into space on April 24, 1990, via the Shuttle, Discovery.

Hubble was designed to be “modular”, with different bay areas holding different scientific instruments. With this approach, Hubble could be maintained by crews from shuttles, basically creating the first assembly line in space. Or would that more likely be, the first erector toy in space? Whatever we call it, it is the modularity of Hubble that assisted in the first real challenge to the telescope. You see, Hubble was born near-sighted.

Off to a Rocky Start

Nebula

Like most of us, Hubble wasn’t born perfect. Hubble’s primary mirror was incorrectly shaped, ground a little too flat to the edge. How flat? The mirror’s edge was off by about the same width of 1/50th of a human hair.

Because the primary mirror was ground a bit too flat, instead of focusing all light into the center of the mirror, the light ended up being spread over a larger area, creating a blurry effect of images — hence the concept of Hubble being near-sighted.

NASA knew that maintenance of Hubble would be by shuttle, but probably wasn’t expecting that maintenance would have to occur so quickly. The challenge was to find a way to fixing the near-sighted effect without having to replace the mirror, a task that was impossible.

spiral galaxy

What NASA came up with was, basically, a pair of glasses for Hubble. Except, in this case, the glasses were the Corrective Optics Space Telescope Axial Replacement (COSTAR), and the Wide Field/Planetary Camera (WF/PC-II). Both of these instruments would provide corrective optics that would compensate for the primary mirror, thereby canceling the blurry effect and providing clear images. These new optics would then be installed by shuttle using slots within Hubble’s instrument array.

On December 2, 1993, the shuttle Endeavour was launched on a unique mission: install the corrective optics and fix Hubble. NASA was making a house call.

Did the fixes work? You only have to look at many of the hundreds of images produced by Hubble to know that the corrective optics — in addition to the excellent work of the Endeavour astronauts who installed the optics — was a success.

How it works

For this section and the next, I turned to STSI’s Hubble Primer.

hubble

According to the primer, Hubble is as long as a school bus, and as tall as a 5 story building. Definitely bigger than that backyard telescope you might be familiar with. Hubble’s shape resembles a long foil wrapped tube with wings, the wings being the solar arrays necessary to provide power for the telescope.

Hubble is controlled from earth, and moves through the use of gyros or reaction wheels. These maintain Hubble’s stable position regardless of factors such as solar radiation and gravitation from other objects. In addition, when Hubble is being positioned to record information from a specific planet, galaxy, or star, a pair of star guides near to the object are located by Hubble. The telescope uses these star guides to maintain a steady fix on the target object. In fact, one of the first activities performed when reviewing a proposal to use some of Hubble’s time and resources is to see whether guide stars have been identified near the object that is the focus of the proposal (as outlined in Observing with Hubble).

Light enters the telescope and hits the primary mirror. This mirror, in turn, focuses this light on a secondary mirror, which in turn reflects the light back to a specific point on the primary mirror. This light is then recorded and analyzed, and data gleamed from the observation process is stored in onboard computers. Scientists then tap into this stored data for the data they need.

star

What are some of the instruments used to record information? Well, the most widely known is the Wide Field and Planetary Camera, responsible for the images you see at the Hubble site and in this article. Others that are currently operating are the Near-Infrared Camera and Multi-Object Spectrometer (NICMOS), for infrared and spectroscopic imaging; the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS); the Corrective Optics Space Telescope Axial Replacement (COSTAR), discussed earlier, which provides for correction of the primary mirror; and the Faint Object Camera (FOS), which operates over a wide wavelength range and which contains an image intensifier to enhance image light. You can read a more detailed overview of the instruments in the General Overview of the Hubble Space Telescope

What we have learned

star

Personally, just to see neighboring galaxies and see the birth of stars sounds like more than enough justification for Hubble, but others may want more. Okay, then how about the fact that with Hubble we now have a better understanding of how the Universe works and our place in it. We have now have physical evidence of black holes to provide support for our theoretical understanding of these “sinkholes” in space.

Additionally, we know more about the age of the universe, have seen Pluto for the first time, recorded evidence of the elusive Brown Dwarfs of space, and, yes, we have even seen the birth of a star.

Into the Future

So, what do the folks at STSI, NASA, and friends have in store for us next? What else but the Next Generation Space Telescope, or NGST.

Nebula

The NGST project is currently underway and hope is that it will launch into space in the year 2007. Its purpose is to search for origins: of planets, or stars, galaxies, even the universe.

I’m fascinated by the thought of how much we have learned from Hubble and the promise of how much more we will learn from NGST. Who knows? Maybe someday while we are looking outward, we’ll actually spot someone looking inward…at us.

Update:

The next generation space telescope, named the James Webb Space Telescope, was launched into space, December 25, 2021. A bit late, but better late than never.

Categories
Writing

Rah

In case it got lost in the discussion about politics in the last post, I finished the book.

Rah.

Categories
Writing

Draft if finished, world didn’t end

In between covering our windows with plastic and applying duct tape around any cracks and crevices, I finally finished the first draft of Practical RDF tonight. I need to do some clean up and re-numbering and then will repost the chapters one more time for one final review. In a few weeks, if we survive imminent biological and chemical devastation, and if O’Reilly’s publication process isn’t co-opted for the upcoming non-UN sanctioned war against Iraq, the book will finally head towards the printers. Lots of work to get to this point.

Despite the long hours this week on the book, I still managed to keep up with the duct tape defense. I’ll have you know I treat the Homeland Security recommendations as seriously as I treat the Department of Homeland Security.

After all, terrorists took down the Twin Towers with box cutters; why can’t we defend ourselves against weapons of mass destruction with duct tape?

Categories
Just Shelley

Passing Notes

Two of my favorite people are having a hard time getting each other’s emails, so I offered to act as a go-between until the email problem was resolved. As I wrote them this morning, this reminded me of an incident that occurred when I was in the 9th grade.

I sat between one of the school’s most popular boys and a very pretty girl in math class. While my wonderful Russian teacher was at the board writing out his esoteric messages, I was enlisted as a conduit in an entirely different message communication process, i.e. I was elicited to pass notes between the two.

When the popular boy first gave me a note and I looked at him in pure astonishment he hastened to add that the note wasn’t for me. Of course not. I was a tall, skinny girl with long frizzy red/brown hair, granny glasses ala John Lennon, and wearing Nehru jackets. This is not the picture of a girl who gets passed notes in math class in school.

I wasn’t offended that the note wasn’t for me. If it had been, it would have shaken my world and caused me too much confusion about my understanding of the roles each of us played. When the situation was clarified, far from being offended, I was relieved that I wouldn’t have to rise to such unexpected behavior and gratified to help out in this endeavor. Though the two were popular and pretty, they were also very nice people—being pretty not being counter to being nice contrary to popularly held views.

However, in the next year when variously assorted curves all of sudden started appearing, and I discovered the shag haircut, make-up, as well as purple-red short, short velvet hot pants and see-through lemon yellow gauzy blouses, I was ready to fit into a new role. But by that time, high school was a dead bore, and I had moved on.

All of which I remembered this morning when I offered to help my friends get emails to and from each other.

Categories
Just Shelley People

Curves and Blogs

Clay Shirky has updated his article to incorporate new data. He pointed to a new list over at Technorati created in response to his article:

Top 100 Interesting New Comers

I’m on the list. But then, I’m also on Technorati’s Top 100 as well as Technorati’s 100 Interesting Recent blogs.

What can I say, I’m a Technorati Blog Magnet.

Clay and I are continuing our chat in the comments attached to the previous post. However, in looking at the new power law distribution graph, and looking at the data that generated the graph, I found that it would be quite simple to get rid of the curve: DaveCory, shut up. You’re skewing the curve.

Sam Ruby wrote about the best summary of this whole thing:

Here’s the way I look at it. I’m listed in the Technorati top 100. By looking at the statistics there, 98.93% of the weblogs it tracks do NOT link to mine. 99.90% of the weblogs tracked have less inbound links than me.

I see no mountains here, only molehills.

Squeak.

Archived with comments at Wayback Machine