Categories
Weather

Heat alert

We’ve had another heat alert today. Temperatures up to 95-97 degrees, and effective temperature close to 110 degrees. Very hot, and very humid. The only way I can get any walks in is to go early enough in the morning. Trying to walk later in the day, even early evening can leave you feeling faint after just a couple of minutes.

It’s actually easier to go walking in the winter here. We don’t get as much snow as most areas, and we don’t have to fight the heat. Or the insects. Unfortunately, my walk through the forest last weekend has left me covered with bites, including all over my face.

I had my car worked on yesterday and when I went in, the guy goes, “Forgot the insect repellant didn’t you.” From there it was to the laundry to clean two large comforters. While waiting for them to dry, another lady, who’d been looking at me for ten minutes, comes over, sweet as can be, and gives me her home remedy for insect bites.

I’m staying home until it’s cooler, and until I don’t invoke pity in everyone who sees me.

One piece of good news: I received my first professional photography payment today. Next week I’m treating my roommate to dinner, or perhaps brunch over at Tower Grove.

The money will come in handy because I still haven’t found a new book. I’ve had to cancel my planned birthday trip this fall: driving to the Southeast, then up the coast, and finally over to the Northwest to my Mom’s house. I don’t mind missing out on the long drive so much, but I had huckleberry margaritas to look forward to. Now, that was disappointing.

Still, there’s always next Spring. It’s nicer driving in the Spring, anyway. And I’ve been told huckleberries freeze.

Categories
Political Weblogging Writing

A Missouri woman heads to American Streets

Starting this next Sunday, I’ll be writing a weekly essay at The American Street–my first time as contributor to a group weblog. Each essay is a longer writing, and may or may not include links. Though the topic will vary from week to week, I hope to bring a unique perspective to each that reflects, among other things, being a woman living in Missouri. Since it’s been said by those who say such things that women prefer facts over theory, you might say I’m providing the show me sex in the show me state viewpoint.

(Speaking of which, Missouri, an important swing state in the upcoming election, is also the site of one of four presidential debates scheduled for this Fall. It’s also a popular campaign stop for both parties, as witness President Bush’s visit today.)

I’ve resisted group weblogs in the past, preferring to keep all my writing here in my own space. What changed my mind in this case–aside from the other excellent writers at The American Street, not to mention my respect for Kevin Hayden–is that I want the discipline that comes with writing in another’s space, and at specific times in the week.

I’m writing on impulse too much lately. Writing impulsivly is not the same as being fresh and spontaneous. There is an element of ‘knee jerk’ reaction to impulsive writing, and I end up regretting such writing, more often than not.

Unfortunately, there’s a lot of material lately that leads to reactive behavior, much of it political in nature. I’ve been reading the top linked stories the last few week and I’m seeing a new element entering into weblogging; we’ll call it the “Fox” element for want of another classification. You can see it with the relatively new weblog written by Michelle Malkin, who happens to be, among other things, a Fox News Contributor.

Malkin has looked at weblogging and seen what it’s done for Wonkette and others, and has enthusiastically jumped in. She’s a real pro, too, having written for the New York Post and National Review Online, as well as being trained by that media maw that is known as Fox. Though we can laugh and sneer at Fox’s lack of credibility, make no mistake–it is the highest rated news station in the country now. Fox sells here in Missouri. Fox sells in a lot of places.

Malkin has, quickly and efficiently, demonstrated how to push the right buttons with her writing. Though I am pleased to see a woman gain such immediate attention, I am less than sanguine when I read her form of journalism.

Malkin succeeds by generating impulsive reactions. Whether they are reactions for or against (primarily for, at this time), there is something about her writing that makes me, at least, want to sit down in a heat of anger and write a blistering refutation.

However, the problem with this kind of reaction is all we’re doing is responding to having our buttons pushed; instead of providing a counter-point, we’re providing a chorus. It’s somewhat comparable to Fox News and that new documentary, Outfoxed. Is Outfoxed outfoxing Fox? Or will it be outfoxed itself as Fox’s audience increases rather than decreases over the next several months, thanks in part to this documentary. The documentary and that foolish MoveOn challenge of Fox’s slogan, “Fair and Balanced”, I should add.

Rather than immediately respond to Maltin’s writings, or other events just as heated and reactive, with many postings barely controlled, I’m hoping that by picking one specific topic, thinking about it carefully and calmly and then writing about it on a specific day, to a weblog shared with other people, my writing will not only be more disciplined, but more effective. The writing can still be as passionate; hopefully, though, it will also be thoughtful, cohesive, and coherent.

(Not to mention spell checked, and carefully edited for grammar. Not, toomany, comma’s or other punctuation an grammar errors other other typos in the writing of it.)

My appreciations to The American Street folks for inviting me in.

Now, I may be more thoughtful with my political writing at The American Street, but I’ll still blather incoherently about everything else here, or in Practical RDF. Just in case you were worried.

Unfortunately, reading popular political weblogs from all sides of the fence, I have a feeling my approach is not going to gain The American Street any fans.

Categories
RDF

New for me

Recovered from the Wayback Machine.

You all probably know about this already, but version 0.8 of RAP or RDF API for PHP was released in June. Among other things, such as an integrated RDF server, RAP provides support for the RDQL (a query language for RDF), now a W3C submission–which you’ve probably also heard about.

One advantage of taking a hiatus away from a technology is that when you come back, all the things you wished for are now a reality. Of course, the disadvantage is that you’re saying things like, “Hey, cool! Look at this!” and everyone has seen it before.

I guess it’s just me, myself, and I in this little journey of rediscovery. That’s okay – at least the audience will agree with me. For the most part.

Categories
RDF

Mining passive social networks

Recovered from the Wayback Machine.

Marc Canter pointed to an upcoming conference, the 1st Workshop on Friend of a Friend, Social Networking, and the Semantic Web (also mentioned at RDFWeb and Danny Ayers). I wasn’t sure about a conference focusing primarily on Friend of a Friend, but looking through the Call for Papers topic list, the conference goes beyond the concept of friend of a friend, if we think of this as primarily focusing on people describing their current, active associations. It also has the potential to go beyond, I think, the current understanding of social networks.

Though social networks have past the hot, new meme phase, we’re still trying to figure out everyday uses for these beasties. Or I should say, I’m trying to find practical and unique uses for social networks. If they continue on as they are, they’re really nothing more than a combination of popularity contest, dating service, job search, mini-blog, and Usenet.

However, the thought of associations defined online in a format that can be mined using standard technologies has a great deal of appeal–and not just within the context of making associations for jobs or professional advancement. If we look at FOAF as a way of enabling open source social networks, and then extend the definition of social networks to include passive associations rather than, or in addition to, active associations–then we have something really unique, and rather exciting.

For instance, I’ve been trying for the last year to find out what happened to others who graduated in 1986 with computer science degrees from Central Washington University. The Alumni directory of CWU isn’t particularly useful because it mainly lists information about people who actively post some new events about themselves, and most of us don’t. I also don’t have access to classmates’ addresses (the Alumni association is wary of giving these out); even if I did, I would hesistate to send them notes because I wouldn’t be sure if these people would want the contact with their old classmates.

If I modify my FOAF file to include information about me attending Central Washingtion University and getting a degree in Computer Science in 1986, this is a node, albeit a passive one, in an existing social network comprised of people who I went to school with. Now if this information were specifically searchable, someone else wanting to connect up with fellow classmates would find my information, including my email address, and they could send me an email, saying hi.

How is this different than the means I have today to connect up with others of my old class? It differs in two important ways:

First of all, the information is publicly available and searchable on the Net. Not only that, but it’s also constrained to specific assertions: I have a degree in computer science; this degree is from Central Washington University; I received this degree in 1986. Someone searching on just these assertions would find my data, rather than get 10,000 records back with a lot of accidental associations based on random scraping of pages in Google.

Secondly, and most importantly, by putting this information into my FOAF file I am acknowledging that I am a part of this particular social network, with an implication that I would welcome associations from other members of this same network. It is a passive node in the network, true; but with FOAF/RDF/OWL and data mining, these passive associations can be converted to active ones in the future.

Orkut leaves me lukewarm and Friendster leaves me cold. Even the Semantic Web doesn’t do much more than elicit a relatively unenthusiastic “yeah, smart shit” out of me. But give me this functionality in the future and I’ll dance from dawn to dusk.

Hopefully Workshops such as this one in Ireland (oh, I’d love to go), will help make this functionality a reality.

Categories
Stuff

Rain drops

I have several essays I’m working on, and as happens when you split your attention into completely different directions, you write and write, but you can’t finish anything. Or if you finish something, you’re not sure you’re happy with it. You feel grumbly, and dissatisfied, and kind of pissed at the whole thing.

Rather than maintain this state, I’m just going to leave everything for the rest of the weekend and go for a walk. A long walk.

However, I did want to point out a fun little scientific article at the BBC that’s making the rounds. Monster raindrops delight experts goes the headlines, about the discovery of the largest raindrops in scientific history. (Thanks to Rogi.)

And there’s also Jerry’s unique form of solar photography using a home telescope and a digital camera. Pretty amazing stuff.

Then there’s my own less impressive contribution to science: my Care and Feeding of Hurricanes done completely in DHTML (Dynamic HTML) – created over four years ago.

It’s not very polished, but it still works all these years later–which isn’t bad for web technology. Especially considering that the JavaScript files that run this application, cbobjects.js and animator.js, were created in 1997.

(Sorry, does not work in Safari. And it requires Javascript. Also, you need to forget all the really sophisticated Flash movies you’ve ever seen before looking at it.)