Categories
Weblogging

Do not click that link

Comment spammers have now been replaced by hackers. New comment spam, wording of which I have left, has a link that goes to a site that has so many out of control media and pop ups in it, it took my Mac down.

Yes. My Mac.

Look for this link – http://www.nero-online.org/lastmeasure

DO NOT CLICK ON IT!

Our new friend wrote:

We develop our own scripts using varied languages and means and can defeat nearly any standard security measure you put in place.

We’re doing this because bloggers provide a waste to the internet, an amassing of imbeciles who think they deserve to be heard, and think people actually care.

Your only real solution is to turn all comments off. Obviously this will mean your egos will no longer be stroked.

🙂

HAVE A NICE DAY

Yes, this is a kiddie hacker, no doubt. This was manually done, and then the auto script was turned on.

update

Unfortunately, the kiddies are attacking in force now. Note that mt-blacklist will not work. Nor will the new measures put out by Movable Type. Sam Ruby’s update could work, but I don’t have the second component of it in place, so it’s not implemented yet.

Categories
Media

Movie, anyone?

When Dave Rogers typed in members from his old sci-fi movie collection, I knew that I had “This Island Earth”, stuffed somewhere among the videos. While picking through the packed boxes, I was able to find my old, beloved copy of “Them”. I almost feel like I found a forgotten hundred dollar bill, stuffed into an old, discarded purse.

The movies aren’t DVD, but that don’t mean no nevermind to me. If they’re a little worn and scratchy, why that will just add to the effect.

Popcorn, anyone?

Categories
Diversity

The little woman

Though I sometimes wish Dean would go out and hire a strong DC insider to manage his campaign and keep him from inserting foot in mouth, my estimation of him as a candidate was enhanced when I read about his relationship with his wife, Dr. Steinberg Dean, and the fact that she doesn’t have much to do with the campaign.

Finally, for once, an example of a political spouse who really does demonstrate that there could possibly be equality of the sexes in this country some day.

However, the mainstream media and all the little anal conservatives are just appalled at the fact that this woman is not giving up her career in order to stand by her man. But I’ll let View from the Loft speak my mind, he did it so well:

Go ahead and Google Judith Steinberg Dean–you’ll see many, many more examples of the we-like-independent-women-but-itsn’t-it-odd- that-Judy-is-never-seen-with-Dean-on-the-campaign-trail train of thought. Actually, “we”–that is, commentators, reporters, and throwbacks–don’t like independent women. They make “us” nervous. They have the unmitigated gall to believe that their own careers are important, not amusements to be tossed aside when hubby calls. “We” want to see a woman stand by her man, and if she doesn’t, well, “we” can’t be held responsible for the consequences. This is what underlies the rationalizations that “we,” as one columnist said, want to see the candidate “in context. And you can’t see a man in context without his wife.”

And here I thought electing a candidate had to do with his beliefs, policy proposals, position on crucial issues, qualifications for the job, and other trivia, when all the while it’s about whether he and his wife have a good (read: man-dominant, woman-subservient) marriage. Silly me.

(Thanks to Joel for the heads up)

(My, I’m making up for lost time not writing to the weblog, aren’t I? I miss my walks, though.)

Categories
Connecting

Good news for MoveOn

Good news for MoveOn, according to Sheila Lennon CBS has denied the organization’s request to air the winning Bush in 30 seconds ad, because supposedly the ad focuses on an ‘issue’, and CBS won’t take issues-based advertising during the Superbowl.

Already people are expressing outrage, particularly since, according to Sheila:

CBS will however run anti-smoking ads during the game and, for the third year, an entry from The White House’s Office of National Drug Control Policy (remember the “drug use aids terrorists” ads?).

I like the MoveOn ad. I think it’s wonderfully orchestrated, and beautifully filmed. However, about the worst place to plunk this ad would have been during a Superbowl, to a lot of people sitting around in a party mood, drinking beer, and eating too much. The same people who want to forget the problems facing this country for a few hours during a sports game, and who are going to react negatively to having said problems forced into their face during their time of ‘escape’.

Now, the MoveOn ad will get publicity because of CBS’s denial, and it won’t cost a penny. More importantly, it will be viewed in the more appropriate context – as a political statement, within the context of a political statement.

Perfect.

Dan Gillmor had talked about this in a humorous, slightly catty posting earlier:

Or maybe it’s all a plot by the CBS outpost of the Liberal Media Conspiracy ™. Here’s the idea: Turn down the ad, which will generate a firestorm of publicity, and then the ad will get played on all the news shows – free advertising and a much bigger bang for the buck. Maybe CBS is plotting with MoveOn.org! Ooooh, those clever lefties.

However, it’s genuinely gratifying to discover that CBS actually has some standards. That’s not obvious given the quality of the network’s programming.

Meow!

Categories
Weblogging

Pop fizzle

Ah me, what a dangerous combination: a weblog and an inability to get away from the computer with hikes and other exercise due to not being able to do more than hobble from my bedroom to the bathroom. I did not have a particularly good night last night as all the various parts of me clamored for attention.

“Feel me!” “No, no! Feel me!” “Ignore them, I hurt the most!”

Damn body parts.

Still, I am able to move about and this makes me happy, if for no other reason than I can get coffee when I want it.

I mentioned yesterday that I actually went into a Little Green Footballs post and left comments. Most people will think this a foolhardy thing to do and I tend to agree with them. However, I cannot watch people making fun of the death of another person without at least attempting to…what I have no idea.

What happened is that Joey deVilla had pointed out a cartoon and award given to Rachel Corrie as “Idolitarian of the Year” for, we presume, getting run over by a bulldozer when she was protesting the wrecking of a home in Palestine. The award was offensive enough, but the humor that was indulged in was, well frankly, beyond anything I’d seen before.

Regardless of whether we agree with a person or not, or regardless of what a person has done, I can see little justification into making humor of their death. It seems to me that webloggers can go too far in what they write and support, and if so, then Charles, the “Prince of Puerile Hatred” crossed the line, he and his band of merry, and mainly anonymous, marauders. So I entered comments to that effect, which basically only served as fresh meat for the ‘wits’ that frequent LGF’s comments.

It was discouraging to see the things said, until I noticed that there really aren’t a huge number of people agreeing with Charles. In fact, his longer threads tend to be a smaller group of dedicated devotees, and then milder comments, or even criticism from people such as myself.

It made me realize that yes a weblogger can go too far, but we don’t have to do anything about it: as they get worse in their behavior and in what they support, they’ll lose more and more people who can’t stomach the never ending hatred until eventually they just fade away, hopefully never to be heard from again. Or they’ll act as a lightning rod for all the people we would rather not have to deal with anyway, in which case they serve a useful purpose.

Weblogging, like Google, is self-healing.