Categories
Environment

Beautiful poison

I haven’t been to Powder Valley in a time so went for a walk this morning. I needed the fresh air, and it was a beautiful day — clear skies, cool winds, and warm sunshine.

Since the leaves are off all the trees now, I could see details of the forest not previously seen. One small valley had about 30 different bird species flying about, looking for food, singing. You forget how blue a true bluebird can be until you see one next to the dry rust brown of the trees. Or how loud woodpeckers can be without the muffling of the leaves.

In and around the trees was life of a different kind: feathery bushes with bright red berries and fallen trees providing home for mushrooms and other fungi. The mushrooms were all of a kind — fan shaped, thin, and delicate, sprouting out in orderly lines, like so many rows of shy maidens.

“Red berries will make you sick. Never touch”

“Never eat a mushroom you find in the forest.”

When we were kids we were told not to pick the pretty red berries, or the tempting mushrooms. However, it was okay to eat the plain purple/black berries, and to gather the hard shelled, inedible looking nuts from the forest floor.

Purple/black, okay to eat. Red, not. Leave the mushroom shapes alone. Don’t you wish people had these outward markings of bad and good? Then you could tell when to touch, and when not to touch.

Categories
Diversity Political

Color-blind

Recovered from the Wayback Machine.

I have been enjoying the take down of Trent Lott this week. In particular, the Washington Post and a weblogger, Eschaton have done an excellent job of roasting this man’s chestnuts over an open fire.

What really caught my focus about this whole thing was Trent Lott’s statement, and his talk about a color-blind society. We want a color-blind society that every American has an opportunity to succeed… he says, and to a point, I agree with him. But I also disagree with him.

You see, I want a color-blind society, but I don’t want it now. Now I want people to look for color, to see color. I want them to look at those in power and see, really, see, face after pure white face. And I want them to look at photos from conferences and businesses and within state and federal leadership and I want the lack of diversity to sound a jarring note. And I want us to be uncomfortable, and to squirm in our chairs because we know that for all our finger pointing at Trent Lott, all that white isn’t the result of one man’s action, or inaction.

Personally, I think we’ve been color-blind too long.

Categories
Weblogging

Humano-Tech Weblogging Conference

Recovered from the Wayback Machine.

Vancouver, B.C. Canada 2003

con-fer-ence (knfr-ns, -frns)
n.

A meeting for consultation or discussion.
An exchange of views.

I hesitated to use the word ‘conference’ because of its association with the costly, corporate gatherings that have become so common. But conference does mean, among other things, “a meeting for discussion…an exchange of views”, and I can’t think of anything else what describes what I’d like to see happen within the weblogging community.

Is it possible to bring people from around the world to one place, to break bread together, to lift a cup (filled with water or wine) in salute ? Is it possible to gather people from around the world in one place, to meet, to talk, to exchange ideas? To gather together views as diverse as the people themselves?

And to do so without having to have a whole lot of money in advance?

The last is the rub, isn’t it?

The city is Vancouver, B.C in Canada. The time is sometime in 2003. The purpose is to bring together weblogging folks — technologists, philosophers, business people, artists, and writers (which includes all of us) — together in one spot. To meet, to socialize, to exchange ideas and views and knowledge; in essence, to see how far we can take this medium.

And to do so wtihout having to have a whole lot of money in advance.

I know that the Blog-Con organizers were able to do have their ‘convergence’ primarily by focusing their get-togethers within attendance-based social venues, such as restaurants. Without having to rent conference space, the preliminary expenses could be kept down, and the costs would then be absorbed by each person paying their own way.

However, restaurants and hotels rooms only work to a point. You need rooms for ‘working sessions’ for want of a better term. For instance, getting weblogging techies together with consumers to strategize technology advances in the next year or two. To have several ‘birds-of-a-feather’ sessions centered around various topics in individual rooms, in addition to panel discussions amidst an audience that is encouraged to participate.

I’m not talking formal speech, with row after row of tables and chairs, and crews with microphones and lights and canned music. But I am talking about rooms with chairs and privacy and the ability for people to speak out without the clash of dishes and the worry of disturbing other diners. Add to this is the need for some technology to enable communication, both within the sessions, and without — to share the events with those who cannot attend

And sure, we’ll also have time to meet friends never met; to have dinner in small groups and large; to walk about, to see the city, to take a boat ride, and to view the Orcas, because weblogging is more than just ‘computers hooked up via the internet’.

This is all doable, but is it doable without organizational ownership? Can we pull this off by ourselves, using our own ingenuity, and manage to keep the costs down so that those who want to attend can afford to attend?

As a start for ideas:

Could we get enough people interested in attending to fill a conference hotel that will then give us the conference rooms gratis? Are there colleges in the area that would be willing to let us use rooms? How about restaurants — do they have meeting rooms that we can get for the cost of the meals?

For those of us who are driving, are we willing to share our cars for the ride? I’m coming from St. Louis, and I have room for three others in my car.

Dave Winer mentioned ideas for a conference, and he used the term adhocracy in reference to it. We got all excited and managed to push the idea up the Daypop flag pole. Now that we’re all calmer, what do we need to do to make this work, without depending on the traditional conference machine?

Update I don’t want to start up a counter-conference conflict. Dave mentioned in the comments that there people working this already, possibly being held at a university.

I’ll focus on the book instead, with appreciations in advance to those who are working this quietly behind the scenes. However, I do have a suggestion: put the thoughts, efforts, and planning online in a weblog; get others involved.

 

Categories
Weblogging

Comfort Food Posts

Recovered from the Wayback Machine.

No matter what our culture or country, each of us has our own favorite comfort foods. These are the foods we eat when we’re not feeling well, or when we’re feeling lonely or sad.

My own favorite comfort foods are quite prosaic: macaroni and cheese, chicken stew with dumplings, chicken pot pie, and egg custard or Crème Brûlée. When all is well with the world there are other foods I love, but it’s these foods that I return to, again and again, when I’m out of sorts.

I was enjoying AKMA’s posting about Mr. Magoo, and the Christmas Carol, and the cartoon adaption of Cyrano, when I thought to myself that I needed to mark this post somehow so I can find it again easily in the future. Then when I needed a little cheering I could go to posts like this one and others like it, to read them again and feel connected to the author and comforted by the writing.

To prevent the loss of such posts, I’ve started recording my favorites in an RDF/RSS file, here, accessed through a page, which I’ll link to my weblog. I’ll be adding to it from time and time as new ones are written, and as I’m able to rediscover ones lost to the past.

Categories
RDF

Picken’ and Choosin’

Recovered from the Wayback Machine.

I have to laugh when I read statements about the lack of technology related to RDF. I am at a point (past it really) with my book where I’m having to go through this huge list I’ve compiled of RDF tools, APIs, and applications and determine which to keep, and which to drop out of the book.

A technology book focusing on a small and finite subject can be exhaustive in its coverage of the subject, including every tool and every API. However, with a more general topic such as RDF, the key is to pick implementations that meet certain criteria; are unique and interesting; are best of breed; and are up-to-date, relevant, relatively bug-free, and relatively easy to install and use. Most of all, when determining what to include and what not to include, the writer has to keep the audience and their needs and interests in mind.

As an example of meeting my audience needs, in the book I’m covering various aspects of using RDF as ‘data: queries, RDF as a data store, and RDF and databases such as MySql. However, I only briefly mention Guha’s rdfDB — a pure RDF-based database. Why? Because there’s been no activity associated with it in some time; it’s still in beta; it’s been ported to only a few operating systems; and it doesn’t fit mainstream technology.

That “doesn’t fit mainstream technology” was a major influence in my decision to include, or not include, RDF implementations. For instance, I’m not covering any ‘C’ RDF API in the book, though ‘C’ has formed the backbone for applications development for years. The reason is because C is seldom used for web-based applications, and RDF is nothing if not web related. Additionally, C applications can be the most operating system dependent, and the most temperamental to install and configure. I don’t know about other developers, but I’m just not interested in playing Makefile tweak games any more. Been there, done that.

I was thinking this morning that, in some ways, my coverage of RDF reflects how our industry has changed so much in the last few years. Monolithic, standalone, linear, closed, function-based applications have been replaced by lightweight, modular, open, and object-based applications, usually hosted on the Web.

Applications built with ‘C’ and FORTRAN have given way, in most cases, to applications written with Java, Perl, Python, and C++. Distributed has replaced centralized. Open has replaced closed and secretive bits of binary blobs that only work within one environment, and only if you ask pretty please.

Social software has replaced data entry sheets. Documentation is no longer a dirty word. Anyone can peer beneath the covers, and the users have stopped being intimidated by the developers.

And anyone can be heard via “this-is-not-an-outline-dammit” weblogs.